World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 104 463 420 260 232 293 42737

Michael R. Lieber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael R. Lieber between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael R. Lieber published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2004. 7 of the 342 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2004. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1975 2025

342 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael R. Lieber: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 3
1983 0
1984 2
1985 2
1986 3
1987 6
1988 3
1989 4
1990 0
1991 2
1992 7
1993 11
1994 9
1995 8
1996 8
1997 8
1998 9
1999 8
2000 7
2001 5
2002 12
2003 9
2004 18
2005 13
2006 15
2007 8
2008 18
2009 17
2010 18
2011 5
2012 6
2013 10
2014 7
2015 11
2016 10
2017 7
2018 6
2019 14
2020 8
2021 6
2022 5
2023 3
2024 3
2025 4
Total 342
Download as CSV

Michael R. Lieber publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Lieber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 287–296 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 293 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52 293
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael R. Lieber D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Lieber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33 104
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael R. Lieber is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong focus on DNA repair mechanisms.

The scientist has published extensively in primary fields such as:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Their subfields of study include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Immunology

Key research topics covered in their work are:

  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology

Michael R. Lieber has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Chih-Lin Hsieh (10 joint publications)
  • Go Watanabe (7 joint publications)
  • Cindy Yen Okitsu (5 joint publications)
  • Eli Rothenberg (4 joint publications)
  • Dale A. Ramsden (4 joint publications)

The scientist's recent papers showcase their focus on molecular mechanisms involved in DNA repair and structural biology. Notable publications include:

  • "The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining," 2020, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
  • "Structural analysis of the basal state of the Artemis:DNA-PKcs complex," 2022, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Structural analysis of the catalytic domain of Artemis endonuclease/SNM1C reveals distinct structural features," 2020, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • "Polymerase μ in non-homologous DNA end joining: importance of the order of arrival at a double-strand break in a purified system," 2020, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Dynamics of the Artemis and DNA-PKcs Complex in the Repair of Double-Strand Breaks," 2022, Journal of Molecular Biology

The venues in which Michael R. Lieber publishes most frequently include:

  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • DNA Repair
  • Molecular Immunology
  • Leukemia

Best Publications

  • The Mechanism of Double-Strand DNA Break Repair by the Nonhomologous DNA End-Joining Pathway

    Michael R. Lieber

  • A continuous tumor-cell line from a human lung carcinoma with properties of type II alveolar epithelial cells.

    Michael Lieber;George Todaro;Barry Smith;Andras Szakal

  • Hairpin Opening and Overhang Processing by an Artemis/DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Complex in Nonhomologous End Joining and V(D)J Recombination

    Yunmei Ma;Ulrich Pannicke;Klaus Schwarz;Michael R. Lieber

  • Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair.

    Howard H. Y. Chang;Nicholas R. Pannunzio;Noritaka Adachi;Michael R. Lieber

  • Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining

    Michael R. Lieber;Yunmei Ma;Ulrich Pannicke;Klaus Schwarz

  • Activity of DNA ligase IV stimulated by complex formation with XRCC4 protein in mammalian cells

    Ulf Grawunder;Matthias Wilm;Matthias Wilm;Xiantuo Wu;Xiantuo Wu;Peter Kulesza;Peter Kulesza

  • The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining.

    Michael R. Lieber

  • R-loops at immunoglobulin class switch regions in the chromosomes of stimulated B cells

    Kefei Yu;Frederic Chedin;Chih Lin Hsieh;Thomas E. Wilson

  • RAG Mutations in Human B Cell-Negative SCID

    Klaus Schwarz;George H. Gauss;Leopold Ludwig;Ulrich Pannicke

  • Establishment of a continuous tumor‐cell line (PANC‐1) from a human carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas

    Michael Lieber;Joann Mazzetta;Walter Nelson-Rees;Michael Kaplan

  • The FEN-1 family of structure-specific nucleases in eukaryotic dna replication, recombination and repair

    Michael R. Lieber

  • V(D)J recombination: a functional definition of the joining signals.

    Joanne E. Hesse;Michael R. Lieber;Kiyoshi Mizuuchi;Martin Gellert

  • The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L stimulates de novo methylation by Dnmt3a

    Frédéric Chédin;Michael R. Lieber;Chih-Lin Hsieh

  • The characterization of a mammalian DNA structure-specific endonuclease.

    J.J. Harrington;M.R. Lieber

  • Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining

    Thomas E. Wilson;Ulf Grawunder;Michael R. Lieber

  • The defect in murine severe combined immune deficiency: Joining of signal sequences but not coding segments in V(D)J recombination

    Michael R. Lieber;Joanne E. Hesse;Susanna Lewis;Gayle C. Bosma

  • Nonhomologous DNA end-joining for repair of DNA double-strand breaks

    Nicholas R. Pannunzio;Go Watanabe;Michael R. Lieber

  • Bidirectional gene organization: a common architectural feature of the human genome.

    Noritaka Adachi;Noritaka Adachi;Michael R. Lieber

  • Role of the non-homologous DNA end joining pathway in the early steps of retroviral infection

    Ling Li;Jennifer M. Olvera;Kristine E. Yoder;Richard S. Mitchell

  • Extrachromosomal DNA substrates in pre-B cells undergo inversion or deletion at immunoglobulin V-(D)-J joining signals.

    Joanne E. Hesse;Joanne E. Hesse;Michael R. Lieber;Michael R. Lieber;Martin Gellert;Martin Gellert;Kiyoshi Mizuuchi;Kiyoshi Mizuuchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Chih-Lin Hsieh
Chih-Lin Hsieh University of Southern California
klaus schwarz
klaus schwarz University of Ulm
Sathees C. Raghavan
Sathees C. Raghavan Indian Institute of Science
Markus Müschen
Markus Müschen Yale University
Martin Gellert
Martin Gellert National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Kiyoshi Mizuuchi
Kiyoshi Mizuuchi National Institutes of Health
Rafael Casellas
Rafael Casellas The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
David G. Schatz
David G. Schatz Yale University
David Van Den Berg
David Van Den Berg University of Southern California
Mel Greaves
Mel Greaves Institute of Cancer Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to a variety of career paths—many of which now intersect with the flexibility of online education. Fields such as bioinformatics, biotechnology, and public health often value interdisciplinary skills. Students interested in blending their interests can look into online interdisciplinary studies bachelor programs low cost to gain a broad, affordable foundation before focusing on molecular specialization.

For those considering alternative scientific careers, options like the history of science connect strongly with Molecular Biology. Many ask, how much do historians make? Understanding these salaries can help students weigh the value of advanced history degrees against STEM-focused roles.

If you’re interested in science communication or research resources, consider library science. The average cost of MLIS degree US is an important factor for those looking to shift into specialized research or academic librarian positions.

Another career path is clinical and research support, such as speech-language pathology. If this appeals to you, review ASHA accredited online SLP master's programs to see which fast, reputable options could advance your career while fitting into your schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. Lieber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles