World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul H. Garthwaite

Paul H. Garthwaite

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
42
Citations
12342
World Ranking
1749
National Ranking
123

Paul H. Garthwaite publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Garthwaite sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 127 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Paul H. Garthwaite D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Garthwaite sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul H. Garthwaite is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom. The main fields of study associated with their work are Mathematics and Decision Sciences. Subfields include Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Applied Mathematics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's research focuses on several main topics, including:

  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Paul H. Garthwaite has contributed to recent papers that cover various subjects in statistics and design. Notable publications include:

  • "MANAGING MARGINS: OVERDESIGN IN HOSPITAL BUILDING SERVICES" (2020) published in the Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference
  • "On Quantifying Expert Opinion about Multinomial Models that Contain Covariates" (2020) in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
  • "Examining collinearities" (2024) in the Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
  • "MANAGING MARGINS: OVERDESIGN IN HOSPITAL BUILDING SERVICES - ERRATUM" (2020) in the Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference
  • "Locally correct confidence intervals for a binomial proportion: A new criteria for an interval estimator" (2023) in the Scandinavian Journal of Statistics

Frequent publication venues where Paul H. Garthwaite's work appears include:

  • Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
  • Scandinavian Journal of Statistics

Collaborations have been recorded with several co-authors, notably:

  • Fadlalla G. Elfadaly
  • Darren Jones
  • Claudia Eckert
  • Zillur Rahman Shabuz
  • Maha W. Moustafa

Best Publications

  • Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities

    Anthony O'Hagan;Caitlin E. Buck;Alireza Daneshkhah;J. Richard Eiser

  • Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences.

    John Robertson Crawford;P. H. Garthwaite

  • Statistical Methods for Eliciting Probability Distributions

    Paul H Garthwaite;Joseph B Kadane;Anthony O'Hagan

  • An Interpretation of Partial Least Squares

    Paul H. Garthwaite

  • Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards.

    John R Crawford;Paul H Garthwaite;Sara Porter

  • Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: evaluation of alternatives using monte carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations.

    John Robertson Crawford;P. H. Garthwaite

  • Statistical methods for the prospective detection of infectious disease outbreaks: a review

    Steffen Unkel;C. Paddy Farrington;Paul H. Garthwaite;Christopher Robertson

  • Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies.

    Craig R Ramsay;Adrian Maxwell Grant;Sheila Ann Wallace;P. H. Garthwaite

  • Comparison of a single case to a control or normative sample in neuropsychology: development of a Bayesian approach.

    John Robertson Crawford;Paul H. Garthwaite

  • Statistical Inference

    Paul H. Garthwaite;Ian I. Jolliffe;Byron Jones

  • Quantifying Precision of Mark-Recapture Estimates Using the Bootstrap and Related Methods

    Stephen T. Buckland;Paul H. Garthwaite

  • An Improved Algorithm for Outbreak Detection in Multiple Surveillance Systems

    Angela Noufaily;Doyo G. Enki;Paddy Farrington;Paul Garthwaite

  • Estimating the percentage of the population with abnormally low scores (or abnormally large score differences) on standardized neuropsychological test batteries: a generic method with applications.

    John R. Crawford;Paul H. Garthwaite;Catherine B. Gault

  • Wanted: Fully Operational Definitions of Dissociations in Single-Case Studies

    John Robertson Crawford;P. H. Garthwaite;Colin Douglas Gray

  • A convenient method of obtaining percentile norms and accompanying interval estimates for self-report mood scales (DASS, DASS-21, HADS, PANAS, and sAD)

    John R. Crawford;Paul H. Garthwaite;Caroline J. Lawrie;Julie D. Henry

  • Multivariate meta-analysis

    In-Sun Nam;Kerrie Mengersen;Paul Garthwaite

  • Payne and Jones revisited: estimating the abnormality of test score differences using a modified paired samples t test.

    J. R. Crawford;David C. Howell;Paul H. Garthwaite

  • Comparing a single case to a control sample: Testing for neuropsychological deficits and dissociations in the presence of covariates

    John R. Crawford;Paul H. Garthwaite;Kevin Ryan

  • Single-case research in neuropsychology: A comparison of five forms of t-test for comparing a case to controls

    John R. Crawford;Paul H. Garthwaite

  • On comparing a single case with a control sample: an alternative perspective.

    John R Crawford;Paul H Garthwaite;David C Howell

Frequent Co-Authors

John Robertson Crawford
John Robertson Crawford University of Aberdeen
Anthony O'Hagan
Anthony O'Hagan University of Sheffield
J. Richard Eiser
J. Richard Eiser University of Sheffield
Nick Andrews
Nick Andrews Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Stephen T. Buckland
Stephen T. Buckland University of St Andrews
Michael E. J. Lean
Michael E. J. Lean University of Glasgow
Scott A. Sisson
Scott A. Sisson University of New South Wales
Neil R. Edwards
Neil R. Edwards The Open University
Andrew Monk
Andrew Monk University of York
Sibyll Schaphoff
Sibyll Schaphoff Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, several related online degrees offer diverse career opportunities. Many professionals enhance their analytical skills by pursuing an easiest mba to get into, which provides foundational business knowledge and leadership experience without overwhelming admission requirements. This blend of skills is highly valued in finance, tech, and consulting sectors.

If you’re looking to combine management expertise with mathematical proficiency, exploring the easiest online mba programs to get into can be a strategic choice. These programs offer flexibility, allowing students to balance studies with work commitments.

For those focused on data-driven decision making and organizational leadership, enrolling in one of the cheapest dba online programs can be an affordable way to advance careers in business analytics or academia.

Additionally, aspiring quantitative analysts or financial experts may consider the cheapest online masters in finance, which leverages mathematical models to solve complex finance problems. These pathways highlight how math-related degrees can open doors to various industries with flexible, accessible education options.

Best Scientists Citing Paul H. Garthwaite

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles