World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
56458
World Ranking
6396
National Ranking
3407

Psychology

D-Index
100
Citations
45972
World Ranking
617
National Ranking
393

Grant L. Iverson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant L. Iverson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 577 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Grant L. Iverson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant L. Iverson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Grant L. Iverson is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as epidemiology, emergency medicine, neurology, psychiatry and mental health, and clinical psychology. The scientist's work centers heavily on topics related to traumatic brain injury research and associated conditions.

The main areas of research covered by Iverson include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Grant L. Iverson has published extensively in several key academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

Some of the notable recent papers featuring their work are:

  • Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport-Amsterdam, October 2022 (2023, British Journal of Sports Medicine)
  • Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016 (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Multidimensional Malingering Criteria for Neuropsychological Assessment: A 20-Year Update of the Malingered Neuropsychological Dysfunction Criteria (2020, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology)
  • The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (2023, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation)
  • Chronic subdural hematoma-incidence, complications, and financial impact (2020, Acta Neurochirurgica)

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Iverson's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Nathan E. Cook
  • Douglas P. Terry
  • Justin E. Karr
  • Andrew J. Gardner
  • Paul D. Berkner

Best Publications

  • Consensus statement on concussion in sport

    Paul McCrory;Willem H. Meeuwisse;Mark Aubry;Bob Cantu

  • Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016

    Paul McCrory;Willem H. Meeuwisse;Jiri Dvorak;Mark Aubry

  • Consensus statement on Concussion in Sport - The 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012

    Paul McCrory;Willem Meeuwisse;Mark Aubry;Bob Cantu

  • The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes

    Matthew H. Liang;Michael Corzillius;Sang Cheol Bae;Robert A. Lew

  • Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research

    Daniel J. Slick;Elisabeth M.S. Sherman;Grant L. Iverson

  • Consensus statement on concussion in sport--the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012.

    Paul McCrory;Willem Meeuwisse;Karen Johnston;Jiri Dvorak

  • Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury.

    Grant L Iverson

  • Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review

    Grant L Iverson;Andrew J Gardner;Douglas P Terry;Jennie L Ponsford

  • Measurement of symptoms following sports-related concussion: reliability and normative data for the post-concussion scale.

    Mark R. Lovell;Grant L. Iverson;Michael W. Collins;Kenneth Podell

  • A systematic review of potential long-term effects of sport-related concussion.

    Geoff T Manley;Andrew J Gardner;Kathryn J Schneider;Kevin M Guskiewicz

  • Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012

    Paul McCrory;Willem H. Meeuwisse;Mark Aubry;Bob Cantu

  • Cumulative effects of concussion in high school athletes.

    Michael W. Collins;Mark R. Lovell;Grant L. Iverson;Robert C. Cantu

  • Recovery from mild concussion in high school athletes.

    Mark R. Lovell;Michael W. Collins;Grant L. Iverson;Melvin Field

  • Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion.

    Grant L. Iverson;Mark R. Lovell;Michael W. Collins

  • The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies.

    Justin E. Karr;Corson N. Areshenkoff;Philippe Rast;Scott M. Hofer

  • Cumulative effects of concussion in amateur athletes

    Grant L. Iverson;Michael Gaetz;Mark R. Lovell;Michael W. Collins

  • Consensus statement on concussion in sport: The 4th international conference on concussion in sport, Zurich, November 2012

    Paul McCrory;Willem H. Meeuwisse;Mark Aubry;Robert C. Cantu

  • Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: a National Academy of Neuropsychology education paper.

    Ronald M. Ruff;Grant L. Iverson;Jeffrey T. Barth;Shane S. Bush

  • Examination of "postconcussion-like" symptoms in a healthy sample

    Grant L. Iverson;Rael T. Lange

  • On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion.

    Michael W. Collins;Grant L. Iverson;Mark R. Lovell;Douglas B. McKeag

Frequent Co-Authors

Noah D. Silverberg
Noah D. Silverberg University of British Columbia
Ross Zafonte
Ross Zafonte Harvard Medical School
Brian L. Brooks
Brian L. Brooks Alberta Children's Hospital
Rael T. Lange
Rael T. Lange Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Michael McCrea
Michael McCrea Medical College of Wisconsin
Christopher R. Levi
Christopher R. Levi John Hunter Hospital
Ruben J. Echemendia
Ruben J. Echemendia University of Missouri–Kansas City
Paul McCrory
Paul McCrory Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Kevin M. Guskiewicz
Kevin M. Guskiewicz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Willem H. Meeuwisse
Willem H. Meeuwisse University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs opens a wide array of career opportunities across various specialties. For those interested in business environments, careers in io psychology offer roles in talent management, organizational development, and employee assessment. This field is ideal for those who want to apply psychological principles to improve workplace productivity and culture.

When considering a psychology education, it's important to reflect on long-term returns and job satisfaction. To help you decide, read more about is it worth it to become a psychologist. This can help you weigh factors like earning potential, educational investment, and job demand in today's market.

Students drawn to schools or academic counseling should consider careers in educational psychology. These roles focus on learning processes, student development, and improving educational outcomes. It's an engaging path for those passionate about fostering growth in educational environments.

Cost is another key consideration. Fortunately, there are many affordable graduate programs in child and adolescent psychology available online. These programs allow students to specialize in supporting the mental health and development of young people, all while balancing studies with other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Grant L. Iverson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles