World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
5871
World Ranking
8896
National Ranking
4727

Kevin J. Bianchini publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin J. Bianchini sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kevin J. Bianchini D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin J. Bianchini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin J. Bianchini is a researcher affiliated with the University of New Orleans in the United States. Their work spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with particular attention to subfields including Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Neurology.

The research conducted by Kevin J. Bianchini prominently addresses topics such as Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Cognitive Functions and Memory, and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances. This focus is reflected in their recent publications.

Their scholarly output includes a paper titled M is For Performance Validity: The IOP-M Provides a Cost-Effective Measure of the Credibility of Memory Deficits during Neuropsychological Evaluations, published in 2023 in the Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. This publication has accumulated citations indicating engagement within the research community.

Kevin J. Bianchini collaborates with multiple co-authors across various studies, including:

  • László A. Erdődi
  • Matthew Calamia
  • Matthew Holcomb
  • Anthony Robinson
  • Lauren Rasmussen

Their publications have appeared in venues such as the Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, which features their research related to psychological evaluation methods.

Best Publications

  • Symptom validity testing: a critical review.

    Kevin J. Bianchini;Charles W. Mathias;Kevin W. Greve

  • On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: lessons from cognitive malingering research.

    Kevin J. Bianchini;Kevin W. Greve;Gary Glynn

  • Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A confirmatory factor analytic study.

    Kevin W. Greve;Timothy R. Stickle;Jeffrey M. Love;Kevin J. Bianchini

  • Detecting Malingering in Traumatic Brain Injury and Chronic Pain: A Comparison of Three Forced-Choice Symptom Validity Tests

    Kevin W Greve;Jonathan Ord;Kelly L Curtis;Kevin J Bianchini

  • WAIS digit span-based indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: classification accuracy in traumatic brain injury.

    Matthew T. Heinly;Kevin W. Greve;Kevin J. Bianchini;Jeffrey M. Love

  • Cognitive Screening Tests Versus Comprehensive Neuropsychological Test Batteries: A National Academy of Neuropsychology Education Paper†.

    Tresa M Roebuck-Spencer;Tannahill Glen;Antonio E Puente;Robert L Denney

  • Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction using the reliable digit span in traumatic brain injury

    Charles W. Mathias;Kevin W. Greve;Kevin J. Bianchini;Rebecca J. Houston

  • Classification Accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering in Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of a Known-Groups Analysis

    Kevin W Greve;Kevin J Bianchini;Bridget M Doane

  • Setting empirical cut-offs on psychometric indicators of negative response bias: a methodological commentary with recommendations

    Kevin W Greve;Kevin J Bianchini

  • Prevalence of Malingering in Patients With Chronic Pain Referred for Psychologic Evaluation in a Medico-Legal Context

    Kevin W. Greve;Jonathan S. Ord;Kevin J. Bianchini;Kelly L. Curtis

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of MMPI-2 Validity Scales and Indicators to Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction in Traumatic Brain Injury

    Kevin W Greve;Kevin J Bianchini;Jeffrey M Love;Adrianne Brennan

  • Official Position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration Policy on Validity Testing: Guidance and Recommendations for Change.

    M. D. Chafetz;M. A. Williams;Y. S. Ben-Porath;K. J. Bianchini

  • Compensation and Malingering in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Dose-Response Relationship?

    Kevin J. Bianchini;Kelly L. Curtis;Kevin W. Greve

  • Pain, Malingering, and Performance on the WAIS-III Processing Speed Index

    Joseph L Etherton;Kevin J Bianchini;Matthew T Heinly;Kevin W Greve

  • Identification of malingered head injury on the wechsler adult intelligence scale - 3rd edition.

    Wiley Mittenberg;S. Theroux;Gisela Aguila Puentes;K. Bianchini

  • Detecting malingered performance on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Validation of Mittenberg's approach in traumatic brain injury.

    Kevin W Greve;Kevin J Bianchini;Charles W Mathias;Rebecca J Houston

  • Pain, malingering and the WAIS-III Working Memory Index.

    Joseph L. Etherton;Kevin J. Bianchini;Megan A. Ciota;Matthew T. Heinly

  • Test of Memory Malingering Performance is unaffected by laboratory-induced pain: implications for clinical use.

    Joseph L. Etherton;Kevin J. Bianchini;Kevin W. Greve;Megan A. Ciota

  • Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in a clinical sample.

    Kevin W. Greve;Fred Ingram;Kevin J. Bianchini

  • California Verbal Learning Test Indicators of Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Sensitivity and Specificity in Traumatic Brain Injury

    Kelly L. Curtis;Kevin W. Greve;Kevin J. Bianchini;Adrianne Brennan

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin W. Greve
Kevin W. Greve University of New Orleans
Kyle Brauer Boone
Kyle Brauer Boone Alliant International University
Glenn J. Larrabee
Glenn J. Larrabee Veterans Health Administration
Ronald M. Ruff
Ronald M. Ruff University of California, San Francisco
Yossef S. Ben-Porath
Yossef S. Ben-Porath Kent State University
William Perry
William Perry University of California, San Diego
Matthew S. Stanford
Matthew S. Stanford Baylor University
Laurence M. Binder
Laurence M. Binder Oregon Health & Science University
Paul A. Arbisi
Paul A. Arbisi University of Minnesota
Jerry J. Sweet
Jerry J. Sweet NorthShore University HealthSystem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to a diverse range of career pathways within the field. Many students pursue specialized programs to meet their career goals, whether it's in clinical, organizational, or forensic settings. Online degrees make it possible to balance education with work or personal commitments.

For those interested in the intersection of psychology and business, consider reviewing the best online phd programs in industrial organizational psychology or the many io psychology degree programs available. These programs can lead to advanced roles in organizational development, HR, and consulting.

If you’re looking to specialize without committing to a full degree, the best psychology graduate certificate programs offer focused training in areas like mental health, counseling, or applied psychology.

For those drawn to criminal justice or law, specializing in forensic psychology is increasingly popular. Explore the best online forensic psychology master's programs to qualify for roles within courts, law enforcement, or corrections.

Each pathway provides unique skills and job opportunities. Online learning ensures flexibility, allowing students to study at their own pace while advancing their careers in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin J. Bianchini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles