World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 48 15066 13578 1099 969 125 11649

Pablo Beato publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pablo Beato between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pablo Beato published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2017. 8 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2017. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 6 publications
2002 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pablo Beato: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 1
2010 1
2011 5
2012 8
2013 6
2014 7
2015 9
2016 6
2017 18
2018 15
2019 14
2020 7
2021 5
2022 4
2023 8
2024 2
2025 6
Total 134
Download as CSV

Pablo Beato publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pablo Beato sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 125 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918 125
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Pablo Beato D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pablo Beato sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835 48
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pablo Beato is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany, where their research primarily focuses on materials science, chemistry, and chemical engineering. Their scientific contributions bridge several subfields including materials chemistry, inorganic chemistry, catalysis, spectroscopy, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

Beato's research centers around catalytic processes in materials science, with specific attention to zeolite catalysis and synthesis as well as catalysis and oxidation reactions. Their work also encompasses topics such as metal-organic framework synthesis and applications, advanced nuclear magnetic resonance techniques, X-ray diffraction methods for crystallography, and catalysts designed for methane reforming.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Catalysis
  • Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
  • Catalysis Today
  • Catalysts
  • Topics in Catalysis

Among their most recent papers are the following:

  • "EXAFS wavelet transform analysis of Cu-MOR zeolites for the direct methane to methanol conversion," published in 2020 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
  • "Finding the active species: The conversion of methanol to aromatics over Zn-ZSM-5/alumina shaped catalysts," published in 2020 in Journal of Catalysis
  • "Mapping the coke formation within a zeolite catalyst extrudate in space and time by operando computed X-ray diffraction tomography," published in 2021 in Journal of Catalysis
  • "Influence of Cu-speciation in mordenite on direct methane to methanol conversion: Multi-Technique characterization and comparison with NH3 selective catalytic reduction of NOx," published in 2020 in Catalysis Today
  • "Comparing the Nature of Active Sites in Cu-loaded SAPO-34 and SSZ-13 for the Direct Conversion of Methane to Methanol," published in 2020 in Catalysts

Beato frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Stian Svelle, Karoline Kvande, Unni Olsbye, L. F. Lundegaard, and Sebastian Prodinger. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse and extensive body of work within the aforementioned fields.

Best Publications

  • Conversion of Methanol to Hydrocarbons: How Zeolite Cavity and Pore Size Controls Product Selectivity

    Unni Olsbye;Stian Svelle;Morten Bjørgen;Pablo Beato

  • A Consistent Reaction Scheme for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides with Ammonia

    Ton V.W. Janssens;Hanne Falsig;Lars Fahl Lundegaard;Peter N. R. Vennestrøm

  • Magnetite Nanocrystals: Nonaqueous Synthesis, Characterization, and Solubility†

    Nicola Pinna;Stephanie Grancharov;Pablo Beato;Pierre Bonville

  • Revisiting the nature of Cu sites in the activated Cu-SSZ-13 catalyst for SCR reaction

    E. Borfecchia;K. A. Lomachenko;K. A. Lomachenko;F. Giordanino;H. Falsig

  • Characterization of Cu-exchanged SSZ-13: a comparative FTIR, UV-Vis, and EPR study with Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-β with similar Si/Al and Cu/Al ratios

    Filippo Giordanino;Peter N. R. Vennestrøm;Lars Fahl Lundegaard;Frederick N. Stappen

  • Methane to Methanol: Structure–Activity Relationships for Cu-CHA

    Dimitrios Pappas;Elisa Borfecchia;Michael Martin Dyballa;Ilia A. Pankin

  • Structure–deactivation relationship for ZSM-5 catalysts governed by framework defects

    Katia Barbera;Francesca Bonino;Silvia Bordiga;Ton V.W. Janssens

  • Interaction of NH3 with Cu-SSZ-13 Catalyst: A Complementary FTIR, XANES, and XES Study.

    Filippo Giordanino;Elisa Borfecchia;Kirill A. Lomachenko;Andrea Lazzarini

  • Assessing the acid properties of desilicated ZSM-5 by FTIR using CO and 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine (collidine) as molecular probes

    Martin Spangsberg Holm;Stian Svelle;Finn Joensen;Pablo Beato

  • The Cu-CHA deNOx Catalyst in Action: Temperature-Dependent NH3-Assisted Selective Catalytic Reduction Monitored by Operando XAS and XES

    Kirill A. Lomachenko;Kirill A. Lomachenko;Elisa Borfecchia;Chiara Negri;Gloria Berlier

  • Cu-CHA - a model system for applied selective redox catalysis.

    Elisa Borfecchia;Pablo Beato;Stian Svelle;Unni Olsbye

  • Shape Selectivity in the Conversion of Methanol to Hydrocarbons: The Catalytic Performance of One-Dimensional 10-Ring Zeolites: ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-48, and EU-1

    Shewangizaw Teketel;Wegard Skistad;Sandrine Benard;Unni Olsbye

  • Catalyst deactivation by coke formation in microporous and desilicated zeolite H-ZSM-5 during the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons

    Francesca Lønstad Bleken;Katia Barbera;Francesca Bonino;Unni Olsbye

  • The Nuclearity of the Active Site for Methane to Methanol Conversion in Cu-Mordenite: A Quantitative Assessment

    Dimitrios Pappas;Andrea Martini;Michael Martin Dyballa;Michael Martin Dyballa;Karoline Kvande

  • Conversion of methanol over 10-ring zeolites with differing volumes at channel intersections: comparison of TNU-9, IM-5, ZSM-11 and ZSM-5

    Francesca Bleken;Wegard Skistad;Katia Barbera;Marina Kustova

  • Composition-driven Cu-speciation and reducibility in Cu-CHA zeolite catalysts: a multivariate XAS/FTIR approach to complexity

    Andrea Martini;Elisa Borfecchia;K. A. Lomachenko;K. A. Lomachenko;I. A. Pankin;I. A. Pankin

  • Selectivity control through fundamental mechanistic insight in the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolites

    Shewangizaw Teketel;Unni Olsbye;Karl-Petter Lillerud;Pablo Beato

  • Methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion: The alkene methylation pathway

    Rasmus Y. Brogaard;Reynald Henry;Yves Schuurman;Andrew J. Medford

  • Conversion of Methanol to Hydrocarbons: Spectroscopic Characterization of Carbonaceous Species Formed over H-ZSM-5

    Luisa Palumbo;Francesca Bonino;Pablo Beato;Morten Bjørgen

  • High Zn/Al ratios enhance dehydrogenation vs hydrogen transfer reactions of Zn-ZSM-5 catalytic systems in methanol conversion to aromatics

    Irene Pinilla-Herrero;Elisa Borfecchia;Julian Holzinger;Uffe V. Mentzel

  • Methylation of benzene by methanol: Single-site kinetics over H-ZSM-5 and H-beta zeolite catalysts

    Jeroen Van der Mynsbrugge;Melina Visur;Unni Olsbye;Pablo Beato

Frequent Co-Authors

Stian Svelle
Stian Svelle University of Oslo
Silvia Bordiga
Silvia Bordiga University of Turin
Unni Olsbye
Unni Olsbye University of Oslo
Carlo Lamberti
Carlo Lamberti University of Turin
Karl Petter Lillerud
Karl Petter Lillerud University of Oslo
Gloria Berlier
Gloria Berlier University of Turin
Ton V.W. Janssens
Ton V.W. Janssens Umicore (Belgium)
Anker Degn Jensen
Anker Degn Jensen Technical University of Denmark
Francesca Bonino
Francesca Bonino University of Turin
Jan-Dierk Grunwaldt
Jan-Dierk Grunwaldt Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various dynamic career paths, many of which can be pursued through specialized online degrees. For those interested in healthcare, exploring how to become a pharmacist provides insight into combining chemistry knowledge with patient care roles.

Another promising route is entering forensic sciences. Many students are choosing best online colleges for forensic science to gain relevant qualifications that blend chemistry with criminal investigations.

For individuals fascinated by the medical and legal aspects of death investigations, learning about how to become a medical examiner assistant offers clear guidance on the education, skills, and job outlook in this specialized field.

Additionally, those looking to understand human behavior alongside scientific evidence can explore advanced studies such as an online forensic psychology masters. This degree complements a chemistry background with psychological expertise applicable to legal settings.

Overall, combining Chemistry with these diverse online educational pathways can lead to rewarding careers in science, healthcare, and forensic disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Pablo Beato

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles