World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 72 5143 4673 373 341 238 34797

Felix Studt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Felix Studt between 1958 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Felix Studt published across 69 years, from 1958 to 2026, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2025. 34 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2025. 1958: 2 publications 1959: 2 publications 1960: 1 publication 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 9 publications
1958 2026

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Felix Studt: publications per year, 1958 to 2026
Year Publications
1958 2
1959 2
1960 1
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 4
2005 6
2006 7
2007 1
2008 3
2009 3
2010 4
2011 9
2012 13
2013 7
2014 23
2015 17
2016 16
2017 15
2018 12
2019 19
2020 22
2021 17
2022 20
2023 16
2024 21
2025 25
2026 9
Total 297
Download as CSV

Felix Studt publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Studt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 238 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216 238
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Felix Studt D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Studt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561 72
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Felix Studt is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on materials science, chemical engineering, and chemistry, with a significant number of publications contributing to these fields.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Chemistry

Within these broader areas, they have specialized in several subfields such as:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Catalysis
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

The core topics of their research revolve around catalytic processes and related areas, specifically:

  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
  • Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions

Felix Studt has authored several scientific papers, notable among them are:

  • "Tracking the formation, fate and consequence for catalytic activity of Pt single sites on CeO2" (2020), published in Nature Catalysis
  • "Unlocking synergy in bimetallic catalysts by core-shell design" (2021), published in Nature Materials
  • "Prospects of Heterogeneous Hydroformylation with Supported Single Atom Catalysts" (2020), published in Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Metal-Specific Reactivity in Single-Atom Catalysts: CO Oxidation on 4d and 5d Transition Metals Atomically Dispersed on MgO" (2020), published in Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "One-Pot Cooperation of Single-Atom Rh and Ru Solid Catalysts for a Selective Tandem Olefin Isomerization-Hydrosilylation Process" (2020), published in Angewandte Chemie International Edition

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Catalysis Science & Technology
  • Angewandte Chemie
  • ACS Catalysis

Felix Studt has collaborated extensively with a network of co-authors, including:

  • Philipp N. Pleßow
  • Dmitry Sharapa
  • Jelena Jelic
  • Yuemin Wang
  • Jan-Dierk Grunwaldt

Best Publications

  • How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels

    Andrew Peterson;Frank Abild-Pedersen;Felix Studt;Jan Rossmeisl

  • The Active Site of Methanol Synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Industrial Catalysts

    Malte Behrens;Felix Studt;Igor Kasatkin;Stefanie Kühl

  • Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis.

    Jens Kehlet Nørskov;Jens Kehlet Nørskov;Jens Kehlet Nørskov;Frank Abild-Pedersen;Frank Abild-Pedersen;Felix Studt;Felix Studt;Thomas Bligaard

  • From the Sabatier principle to a predictive theory of transition-metal heterogeneous catalysis

    Andrew J. Medford;Aleksandra Vojvodic;Jens S. Hummelshøj;Johannes Voss

  • Scaling properties of adsorption energies for hydrogen-containing molecules on transition-metal surfaces.

    F. Abild-Pedersen;J. Greeley;F. Studt;J. Rossmeisl

  • A theoretical evaluation of possible transition metal electro-catalysts for N2 reduction

    Egill Skulason;Egill Skulason;Thomas Bligaard;Thomas Bligaard;Thomas Bligaard;Sigrıdur Gudmundsdottir;Felix Studt

  • Identification of non-precious metal alloy catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene

    Felix Studt;Frank Abild-Pedersen;Thomas Bligaard;Rasmus Zink Sørensen

  • Discovery of a Ni-Ga catalyst for carbon dioxide reduction to methanol

    Felix Studt;Irek Sharafutdinov;Frank Abild-Pedersen;Christian Fink Elkjær

  • A benchmark database for adsorption bond energies to transition metal surfaces and comparison to selected DFT functionals

    Jess Wellendorff;Trent L. Silbaugh;Delfina Garcia-Pintos;Jens K. Nørskov

  • Theory-guided design of catalytic materials using scaling relationships and reactivity descriptors

    Zhi-Jian Zhao;Sihang Liu;Shenjun Zha;Dongfang Cheng

  • Structure effects on the energetics of the electrochemical reduction of CO2 by copper surfaces

    William J. Durand;Andrew A. Peterson;Andrew A. Peterson;Felix Studt;Frank Abild-Pedersen

  • The Mechanism of CO and CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol over Cu-Based Catalysts

    Felix Studt;Felix Studt;Malte Behrens;Malte Behrens;Edward L. Kunkes;Nygil Thomas;Nygil Thomas

  • Exploring the limits: A low-pressure, low-temperature Haber–Bosch process

    Aleksandra Vojvodic;Andrew James Medford;Felix Studt;Frank Abild-Pedersen

  • Understanding trends in C-H bond activation in heterogeneous catalysis

    Allegra A. Latimer;Ambarish R. Kulkarni;Hassan Aljama;Joseph H. Montoya

  • Understanding activity trends in electrochemical water oxidation to form hydrogen peroxide

    Xinjian Shi;Samira Siahrostami;Guo Ling Li;Yirui Zhang

  • Universal transition state scaling relations for (de)hydrogenation over transition metals

    S. Wang;V. Petzold;V. Tripkovic;J. Kleis

  • Fundamental Concepts in Heterogeneous Catalysis

    Jens K. Nørskov;Felix Studt;Frank Abild-Pedersen;Thomas Bligaard

  • Theoretical Insight into the Trends that Guide the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formic Acid

    Jong Suk Yoo;Jong Suk Yoo;Rune Christensen;Tejs Vegge;Jens K. Nørskov;Jens K. Nørskov

  • Electrochemical chlorine evolution at rutile oxide (110) surfaces

    Heine Anton Hansen;Isabela Costinela Man;Felix Studt;Frank Abild-Pedersen

  • Assessing the reliability of calculated catalytic ammonia synthesis rates

    Andrew James Medford;Jess Wellendorff;Jess Wellendorff;Aleksandra Vojvodic;Felix Studt

  • Exploring the Limits: A Low‐Pressure, Low‐Temperature Haber—Bosch Process

    Aleksandra Vojvodic;Andrew James Medford;Felix Studt;Frank Abild‐Pedersen

  • From the Sabatier Principle to a Predictive Theory of Transition-Metal Heterogeneous Catalysis

    Andrew J. Medford;Aleksandra Vojvodic;Jens S. Hummelshoej;Johannes Voss

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens K. Nørskov
Jens K. Nørskov Technical University of Denmark
Frank Abild-Pedersen
Frank Abild-Pedersen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Thomas Bligaard
Thomas Bligaard Technical University of Denmark
Jan-Dierk Grunwaldt
Jan-Dierk Grunwaldt Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Jan Rossmeisl
Jan Rossmeisl University of Copenhagen
Anker Degn Jensen
Anker Degn Jensen Technical University of Denmark
Zhi-Jian Zhao
Zhi-Jian Zhao Tianjin University
Aleksandra Vojvodic
Aleksandra Vojvodic University of Pennsylvania
Yuemin Wang
Yuemin Wang Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Christof Wöll
Christof Wöll Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Chemistry in the USA, related fields such as forensic science offer exciting career opportunities. Understanding the practical applications of chemistry in solving crimes makes forensic science a compelling choice. Exploring forensic science careers can provide valuable insights into job roles and industry demands.

Many professionals in related fields benefit from pursuing supplementary qualifications. For example, an online criminal justice degree can complement a chemistry background and broaden career prospects. If cost is a concern, resources detailing how much does a criminal justice degree cost can help prospective students plan effectively.

Associates degrees also serve as accessible entry points into justice-related careers. Students can compare options by reviewing the best online associate degree programs in criminal justice to find flexible and affordable pathways.

Additionally, roles such as paralegals often intersect with forensic and legal applications of chemistry. Understanding the earning potential through data on paralegal salary associate's degree can guide decisions about pursuing an associate’s degree in this domain.

Best Scientists Citing Felix Studt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles