World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9131 8573 275 269 634 44798

Philip Weinstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip Weinstein between 1969 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip Weinstein published across 56 years, from 1969 to 2024, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2020. 5 of the 681 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2020. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 15 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 10 publications 1983: 12 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 14 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 18 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 26 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications
1969 2024

681 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip Weinstein: publications per year, 1969 to 2024
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 2
1977 4
1978 8
1979 5
1980 15
1981 4
1982 10
1983 12
1984 10
1985 9
1986 13
1987 14
1988 14
1989 9
1990 10
1991 10
1992 14
1993 11
1994 18
1995 13
1996 26
1997 12
1998 9
1999 10
2000 10
2001 6
2002 9
2003 21
2004 27
2005 22
2006 22
2007 17
2008 19
2009 20
2010 21
2011 27
2012 17
2013 14
2014 13
2015 24
2016 14
2017 18
2018 15
2019 16
2020 30
2021 27
2022 3
2023 3
2024 2
Total 681
Download as CSV

Philip Weinstein publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Weinstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 634 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 634
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip Weinstein D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Weinstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip Weinstein is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant concentration on spinal cord injury research and trauma and emergency care studies.

Their recent work includes publications spanning from 2020 to 2024, covering topics related to spinal cord injury, pain management, and machine learning applications in healthcare. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Diagnostic blood RNA profiles for human acute spinal cord injury" (2020, The Journal of Experimental Medicine)
  • "Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Spinal Cord Injury (TRACK-SCI): an overview of initial enrollment and demographics" (2020, Neurosurgical FOCUS)
  • "Trigger point injection for post-mastectomy pain: a simple intervention with high rate of long-term relief" (2021, npj Breast Cancer)
  • "Expert-augmented automated machine learning optimizes hemodynamic predictors of spinal cord injury outcome" (2022, PLoS ONE)
  • "ATF3 is a neuron-specific biomarker for spinal cord injury and ischaemic stroke" (2024, Clinical and Translational Medicine)

Their frequent co-authors include Sanjay S. Dhall, Nikos Kyritsis, William D. Whetstone, Adam R. Ferguson, and Jacqueline C. Bresnahan, demonstrating collaborative work in related research areas.

Philip Weinstein's work has been published in several venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Neurosurgical FOCUS
  • PLoS ONE
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurosurgery
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Their research spans various subfields including pathology and forensic medicine, emergency medicine, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and epidemiology.

Main topics covered in their body of work are:

  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects

Best Publications

  • Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats.

    E Z Longa;P R Weinstein;S Carlson;R Cummins

  • Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy.

    M. E. Moseley;Y. Cohen;J. Mintorovitch;L. Chileuitt

  • Climate change, flooding, urbanisation and leptospirosis: fuelling the fire?

    Colleen L. Lau;Lee D. Smythe;Scott B. Craig;Scott B. Craig;Philip Weinstein

  • Human copper-zinc superoxide dismutase transgenic mice are highly resistant to reperfusion injury after focal cerebral ischemia.

    G Yang;P H Chan;J Chen;E Carlson

  • Comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI for the early detection of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats

    J. Mintorovitch;M. E. Moseley;L. Chileuitt;H. Shimizu

  • The prevalence and practice management consequences of dental fear in a major US city

    Peter Milgrom;Louis Fiset;Sandra Melnick;Philip Weinstein

  • The influence of climate variation and change on diarrheal disease in the Pacific Islands.

    R.B.K. Singh;S. Hales;N. De Wet;R. Raj

  • FOUR DIMENSIONS OF FEAR OF DENTAL INJECTIONS

    Peter Milgrom;Susan E. Coldwell;Tracy Getz;Philip Weinstein

  • Mice overexpressing rat heat shock protein 70 are protected against cerebral infarction.

    Sunita Rajdev;Kazushi Hara;Yasuaki Kokubo;Ruben Mestril

  • Decreased mortality from brain abscesses since advent of computerized tomography.

    Mark L. Rosenblum;Julian T. Hoff;David Norman;Philip R. Weinstein

  • Origins of childhood dental fear

    Peter Milgrom;Lloyd Mancl;Barbara King;Philip Weinstein

  • Motivating mothers to prevent caries: Confirming the beneficial effect of counseling

    Philip Weinstein;Rosamund Harrison;Tonya Benton

  • Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of acute focal cerebral ischemia: comparison of signal intensity with changes in brain water and Na+,K(+)-ATPase activity.

    Jan Mintorovitch;G. Y. Yang;Hiroaki Shimizu;John Kucharczyk

  • Chronic Treatment With Minocycline Preserves Adult New Neurons and Reduces Functional Impairment After Focal Cerebral Ischemia

    Zhengyan Liu;Yang Fan;Seok Joon Won;Melanie Neumann

  • Irradiation attenuates neurogenesis and exacerbates ischemia‐induced deficits

    Jacob Raber;Yang Fan;Yang Fan;Yasuhiko Matsumori;Yasuhiko Matsumori;Zhengyan Liu;Zhengyan Liu

  • Motivating parents to prevent caries in their young children: one-year findings.

    Philip Weinstein;Rosamund Harrison;Tonya Benton

  • Mild intraischemic hypothermia reduces postischemic hyperperfusion, delayed postischemic hypoperfusion, blood-brain barrier disruption, brain edema, and neuronal damage volume after temporary focal cerebral ischemia in rats.

    Hiroshi Karibe;Gregory J. Zarow;Steven H. Graham;Philip R. Weinstein

  • Hsp70 overexpression sequesters AIF and reduces neonatal hypoxic/ischemic brain injury.

    Yasuhiko Matsumori;Shwuhuey M Hong;Koji Aoyama;Yang Fan

  • Indirect potable reuse: a sustainable water supply alternative.

    Clemencia Rodriguez;Paul Van Buynder;Richard Lugg;Palenque Blair

  • Heme-oxygenase-1 induction in glia throughout rat brain following experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    Paul Matz;Christopher Turner;Philip R. Weinstein;Stephen M. Massa

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin F. Breed
Martin F. Breed Flinders University
Thomas L. James
Thomas L. James University of California, San Francisco
Jialing Liu
Jialing Liu University of California, San Francisco
Peng Bi
Peng Bi University of Adelaide
Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames University of California, San Francisco
Frank R. Sharp
Frank R. Sharp University of California, Davis
Pak H. Chan
Pak H. Chan Stanford University
Qiyong Liu
Qiyong Liu Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention
Alistair Woodward
Alistair Woodward University of Auckland
Xiaobo Liu
Xiaobo Liu University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a healthcare career that complements traditional medical studies, exploring online degrees can expand your opportunities. Nursing is one popular pathway, with many students researching how much is online nursing school to find a program that fits their financial needs.

For those already holding a nursing credential, the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs can help nurses advance their education and access broader career options without pausing their employment. Individuals interested in academia or leadership positions can pursue doctorate in nursing education online programs to gain the highest credentials in their field.

Not a nurse yet? Some may choose direct entry msn programs for non nurses online, offering an accelerated route into advanced nursing practice, even without prior clinical experience. These flexible career pathways provide practical, affordable, and accessible options for those passionate about healthcare, teaching, or leadership roles in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Weinstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles