World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernard Hoflack

Bernard Hoflack

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
11537
World Ranking
14414
National Ranking
1020

Bernard Hoflack publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Hoflack sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 113 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bernard Hoflack D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Hoflack sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernard Hoflack is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany, where their research primarily spans several interconnected fields and topics within the life sciences. The scientist's work integrates aspects of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience, emphasizing cellular and molecular mechanisms.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Neuroscience

The subfields where Bernard Hoflack has contributed are:

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Their research predominantly covers the following scientific topics:

  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Signaling Pathways in Disease

Bernard Hoflack has collaborated with several researchers across different projects. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Bryon Silva
  • Christian Niehage
  • Marta Maglione
  • Stephan J. Sigrist
  • Thomas Wassmer

They have contributed to the publication landscape through articles in journals focused on their specialized areas. Their publications have appeared in venues such as:

  • Journal of Neurogenetics

Among the recent papers authored by Bernard Hoflack is:

  • "Interactions between amyloid precursor protein-like (APPL) and MAGUK scaffolding proteins contribute to appetitive long-term memory in Drosophila melanogaster", 2020, Journal of Neurogenetics

This paper highlights research on molecular interactions relevant to memory mechanisms in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, which fits within Hoflack's broader focus on neurobiology and signaling pathways.

Best Publications

  • The small GTPase rab5 functions as a regulatory factor in the early endocytic pathway.

    Cecilia Bucci;Robert G. Parton;Ian H. Mather;Henk Stunnenberg

  • The mannose 6-phosphate receptor and the biogenesis of lysosomes

    Gareth Griffiths;Bernard Hoflack;Kai Simons;Ira Mellman

  • Rabenosyn-5, a Novel Rab5 Effector, Is Complexed with Hvps45 and Recruited to Endosomes through a Fyve Finger Domain

    Erik Nielsen;Savvas Christoforidis;Sandrine Uttenweiler-Joseph;Marta Miaczynska

  • The small GTP-binding protein rab6 functions in intra-Golgi transport.

    O Martinez;A Schmidt;J Salaméro;B Hoflack

  • Mutant Rab7 Causes the Accumulation of Cathepsin D and Cation-independent Mannose 6–Phosphate Receptor in an Early Endocytic Compartment

    Barry Press;Yan Feng;Bernard Hoflack;Angela Wandinger-Ness

  • The mammalian AP-3 adaptor-like complex mediates the intracellular transport of lysosomal membrane glycoproteins.

    Roland Le Borgne;Agustin Alconada;Ulrike Bauer;Bernard Hoflack

  • In exocrine pancreas, the basolateral endocytic pathway converges with the autophagic pathway immediately after the early endosome.

    J Tooze;M Hollinshead;T Ludwig;K Howell

  • Purification and characterization of a cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor from murine P388D1 macrophages and bovine liver.

    B Hoflack;S Kornfeld

  • Tightly anchored tissue-mimetic matrices as instructive stem cell microenvironments.

    Marina C Prewitz;F Philipp Seib;Malte von Bonin;Jens Friedrichs

  • A Casein Kinase II Phosphorylation Site in the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Cation-dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor Determines the High Affinity Interaction of the AP-1 Golgi Assembly Proteins with Membranes (∗)

    Fabienne Mauxion;Roland Le Borgne;Hélène Munier-Lehmann;Bernard Hoflack

  • Bridging membrane and cytoskeleton dynamics in the secretory and endocytic pathways

    Mihaela Anitei;Bernard Hoflack

  • A tyrosine-based motif and a casein kinase II phosphorylation site regulate the intracellular trafficking of the varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein I, a protein localized in the trans-Golgi network.

    A Alconada;U Bauer;B Hoflack

  • Visualization of TGN to Endosome Trafficking through Fluorescently Labeled MPR and AP-1 in Living Cells

    Satoshi Waguri;Frédérique Dewitte;Roland Le Borgne;Yves Rouillé

  • Characterization of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor-enriched prelysosomal compartment in NRK cells.

    G. Griffiths;R. Matteoni;R. Back;B. Hoflack

  • Distribution of newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes in the endocytic pathway of normal rat kidney cells.

    T Ludwig;G Griffiths;B Hoflack

  • Protein transport from the secretory to the endocytic pathway in mammalian cells.

    Roland Le Borgne;Bernard Hoflack

  • Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptors and ADP-ribosylation Factors Cooperate for High Affinity Interaction of the AP-1 Golgi Assembly Proteins with Membranes (∗)

    Roland Le Borgne;Gareth Griffiths;Bernard Hoflack

  • Lysosomal enzyme binding to mouse P388D1 macrophage membranes lacking the 215-kDa mannose 6-phosphate receptor: evidence for the existence of a second mannose 6-phosphate receptor.

    Bernard Hoflack;Stuart Kornfeld

  • Retromer controls epithelial cell polarity by trafficking the apical determinant crumbs

    Shirin Meher Pocha;Thomas Wassmer;Thomas Wassmer;Christian Niehage;Bernard Hoflack

  • The small GTPase rab5 functions as a regulatory factor in the early endocytic pathway

    C. Bucci;R.G. Parton;I.H. Mather;H. Stunnenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Marino Zerial
Marino Zerial Max Planck Society
Jean Montreuil
Jean Montreuil Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Thomas Ludwig
Thomas Ludwig Columbia University
Peter Lobel
Peter Lobel Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Stuart Kornfeld
Stuart Kornfeld Washington University in St. Louis
Graça Raposo
Graça Raposo Institut Curie
Philippe Bulet
Philippe Bulet Grenoble Alpes University
Carsten Werner
Carsten Werner Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and healthcare career pathways. Many students expand their expertise by pursuing an mba healthcare management online, which helps bridge scientific knowledge and leadership skills, essential for roles in hospital administration or biotech management.

Careers in medical billing and coding are also a practical choice for students with an interest in healthcare technology. Understanding the difference between ccs certification options is crucial, as certification can affect job roles and salary prospects within the industry.

For those wondering how to enter the field, you may ask how long does it take to become a medical coder. Training time varies but typically includes certificate programs or associate degrees, with many positions available after just a year or two of study.

The medical billing and coding outlook remains positive, with increasing demand for qualified professionals and flexible remote work options—making it a strong complement to traditional science degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard Hoflack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles