World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
12219
World Ranking
11442
National Ranking
4944

Peter Lobel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Lobel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 120 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter Lobel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Lobel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peter Lobel is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine.

The scientist's work focuses on subfields including Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Physiology, Cell Biology, and Oncology. Their research topics involve Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications, Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies, Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research, Cellular Transport and Secretion, Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research, and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis.

Peter Lobel has published multiple papers, among which are the following:

  • Comparative Analysis of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Subcellular Proteomics, 2020, Journal of Proteome Research
  • Lysosomal protein thermal stability does not correlate with cellular half-life: global observations and a case study of tripeptidyl-peptidase 1, 2020, Biochemical Journal
  • Elevated levels of tripeptidyl peptidase 1 do not ameliorate pathogenesis in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease, 2022, Neurobiology of Aging
  • A Method to Estimate the Distribution of Proteins across Multiple Compartments Using Data from Quantitative Proteomics Subcellular Fractionation Experiments, 2022, Journal of Proteome Research
  • Comparative Analysisof Quantitative Mass SpectrometricMethods for Subcellular Proteomics, 2020, Figshare

The most frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Biochemical Journal
  • Neurobiology of Aging
  • Figshare
  • The FASEB Journal

Peter Lobel has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • David E. Sleat
  • Whitney Banach-Petrosky
  • Dirk F. Moore
  • Anurag Modak
  • Katherine E. Larrimore

Recognition of Lobel's scientific contributions includes receiving the Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) award in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Identification of HE1 as the Second Gene of Niemann-Pick C Disease

    Saule Naureckiene;David. E. Sleat;David. E. Sleat;Henry Lackland;Anthony Fensom

  • Association of Mutations in a Lysosomal Protein with Classical Late-Infantile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis

    David E. Sleat;Robert J. Donnelly;Henry Lackland;Henry Lackland;Chang Gong Liu

  • Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptors and Lysosomal Enzyme Targeting

    N. M. Dahms;P. Lobel;Stuart Kornfeld

  • Genetic evidence for nonredundant functional cooperativity between NPC1 and NPC2 in lipid transport

    David E. Sleat;Jennifer A. Wiseman;Mukarram El-Banna;Sandy M. Price

  • STRUCTURE OF A CHOLESTEROL-BINDING PROTEIN DEFICIENT IN NIEMANN-PICK TYPE C2 DISEASE

    Natalia Friedland;Heng-Ling Liou;Peter Lobel;Ann M. Stock

  • Mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of the 275 kd mannose 6-phosphate receptor differentially alter lysosomal enzyme sorting and endocytosis.

    Peter Lobel;Karen Fujimoto;Richard D. Ye;Gareth Griffiths

  • Proteomics of the Lysosome

    Torben Lübke;Peter Lobel;Peter Lobel;David E. Sleat;David E. Sleat

  • Activation of Microglia Acidifies Lysosomes and Leads to Degradation of Alzheimer Amyloid Fibrils

    Amitabha Majumdar;Dana Cruz;Nikiya Asamoah;Adina Buxbaum

  • A mutation in the ovine cathepsin D gene causes a congenital lysosomal storage disease with profound neurodegeneration

    Jaana Tyynelä;Istvan Sohar;David E. Sleat;Rosalie M. Gin

  • Cloning and sequence analysis of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor.

    P. Lobel;N. M. Dahms;Stuart Kornfeld

  • Structural Basis of Sterol Binding by NPC2, a Lysosomal Protein Deficient in Niemann-Pick Type C2 Disease

    Sujuan Xu;Brian Benoff;Heng-Ling Liou;Peter Lobel

  • Mechanism of Cholesterol Transfer from the Niemann-Pick Type C2 Protein to Model Membranes Supports a Role in Lysosomal Cholesterol Transport *♦

    Sunita R. Cheruku;Zhi Xu;Roxanne Dutia;Peter Lobel

  • Mutational Analysis of the Defective Protease in Classic Late-Infantile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, a Neurodegenerative Lysosomal Storage Disorder

    David E. Sleat;Rosalie M. Gin;Istvan Sohar;Krystyna Wisniewski

  • 46 kd mannose 6-phosphate receptor: Cloning, expression, and homology to the 215 kd mannose 6-phosphate receptor

    Nancy M. Dahms;Peter Lobel;James Breitmeyer;John M. Chirgwin

  • A Mouse Model of Classical Late-Infantile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis Based on Targeted Disruption of the CLN2 Gene Results in a Loss of Tripeptidyl-Peptidase I Activity and Progressive Neurodegeneration

    David E. Sleat;Jennifer A. Wiseman;Mukarram El-Banna;Kwi Hye Kim

  • The Human CLN2 Protein/Tripeptidyl-Peptidase I Is a Serine Protease That Autoactivates at Acidic pH

    Li Lin;Li Lin;Istvan Sohar;Henry Lackland;Peter Lobel;Peter Lobel

  • Differential sorting of lysosomal enzymes in mannose 6-phosphate receptor-deficient fibroblasts.

    T Ludwig;H Munier-Lehmann;U Bauer;M Hollinshead

  • Niemann-Pick Disease Type C: Spectrum of HE1 Mutations and Genotype/Phenotype Correlations in the NPC2 Group

    Gilles Millat;Karim Chikh;Saule Naureckiene;David E. Sleat

  • Cloning of the bovine 215-kDa cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor.

    Peter Lobel;Nancy M. Dahms;James Breitmeyer;John M. Chirgwin

  • Intraventricular enzyme replacement improves disease phenotypes in a mouse model of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

    Michael Chang;Jonathan D Cooper;David E Sleat;David E Sleat;Seng H Cheng

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann M. Stock
Ann M. Stock Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Stuart Kornfeld
Stuart Kornfeld Washington University in St. Louis
Beverly L. Davidson
Beverly L. Davidson Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Frederick R. Maxfield
Frederick R. Maxfield Cornell University
Seng H. Cheng
Seng H. Cheng Pfizer (United States)
Michael M. Shen
Michael M. Shen Columbia University
Jinchuan Xing
Jinchuan Xing Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Thomas Ludwig
Thomas Ludwig Columbia University
Marie T. Vanier
Marie T. Vanier Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Lobel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles