World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11873 11169 369 351 256 26509

Marie T. Vanier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marie T. Vanier between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marie T. Vanier published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2006. 3 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2006. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 6 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1971 2025

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marie T. Vanier: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 2
1973 4
1974 2
1975 2
1976 1
1977 0
1978 3
1979 1
1980 3
1981 1
1982 0
1983 6
1984 1
1985 1
1986 6
1987 4
1988 4
1989 3
1990 2
1991 9
1992 4
1993 6
1994 3
1995 3
1996 3
1997 8
1998 7
1999 11
2000 7
2001 8
2002 3
2003 4
2004 9
2005 10
2006 14
2007 9
2008 11
2009 8
2010 9
2011 6
2012 12
2013 8
2014 4
2015 5
2016 6
2017 9
2018 6
2019 2
2020 3
2021 3
2022 5
2023 6
2024 1
2025 2
Total 271
Download as CSV

Marie T. Vanier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie T. Vanier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 256 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 256
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Marie T. Vanier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie T. Vanier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marie T. Vanier is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in lysosomal storage disorders and related fields. Their research output spans multiple topics primarily centered on Niemann-Pick disease and other rare metabolic conditions.

Their most frequent publication venues include:

  • Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
  • Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Vanier's main fields of study encompass Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a notable focus on subfields such as Physiology, Hematology, Organic Chemistry, Cell Biology, and Molecular Biology. Their research topics include:

  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Some of their recent publications illustrate the focus and scope of their work:

  • Treatment outcomes following continuous miglustat therapy in patients with Niemann-Pick disease Type C: a final report of the NPC Registry (2020, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases)
  • Consensus clinical management guidelines for acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (Niemann-Pick disease types A, B and A/B) (2023, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases)
  • Long-term survival outcomes of patients with Niemann-Pick disease type C receiving miglustat treatment: A large retrospective observational study (2020, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease)
  • Prospective study of the natural history of chronic acid sphingomyelinase deficiency in children and adults: eleven years of observation (2021, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases)
  • Clinical disease characteristics of patients with Niemann-Pick Disease Type C: findings from the International Niemann-Pick Disease Registry (INPDR) (2022, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases)

Frequent collaborators in their research include Bénédicte Héron, Thierry Levade, Magali Pettazzoni, Roseline Froissart, and Helena Jahnová.

Best Publications

  • Niemann-Pick C1 disease gene: homology to mediators of cholesterol homeostasis.

    Eugene D. Carstea;Jill A. Morris;Katherine G. Coleman;Stacie K. Loftus

  • Niemann-Pick disease type C

    Marie T Vanier

  • Identification of HE1 as the Second Gene of Niemann-Pick C Disease

    Saule Naureckiene;David. E. Sleat;David. E. Sleat;Henry Lackland;Anthony Fensom

  • Niemann-Pick disease type C.

    MT Vanier;G Millat

  • Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Niemann-Pick disease type C: an update.

    Marc C. Patterson;Christian J. Hendriksz;Mark Walterfang;Frederic Sedel

  • A defect in cholesterol esterification in Niemann-Pick disease (type C) patients

    Peter G. Pentchev;Marcella E. Comly;Howard S. Kruth;Marie T. Vanier

  • Chronic Cyclodextrin Treatment of Murine Niemann-Pick C Disease Ameliorates Neuronal Cholesterol and Glycosphingolipid Storage and Disease Progression

    Cristin D. Davidson;Nafeeza F. Ali;Matthew C. Micsenyi;Gloria Stephney

  • The adult form of Niemann-Pick disease type C.

    Mathieu Sévin;Gaëtan Lesca;Nicole Baumann;Gilles Millat

  • Genetic evidence for nonredundant functional cooperativity between NPC1 and NPC2 in lipid transport

    David E. Sleat;Jennifer A. Wiseman;Mukarram El-Banna;Sandy M. Price

  • Krabbe disease : a galactosylsphingosine (psychosine) lipidosis

    L Svennerholm;M T Vanier;J E Månsson

  • Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Globoid-Cell Leukodystrophy

    William Krivit;Elsa G. Shapiro;Charles Peters;John E. Wagner

  • Genetic heterogeneity in Niemann-Pick C disease: a study using somatic cell hybridization and linkage analysis.

    M T Vanier;S Duthel;C Rodriguez-Lafrasse;P Pentchev

  • Complex lipid trafficking in Niemann-Pick disease type C.

    Marie T. Vanier

  • Type C Niemann-Pick disease: spectrum of phenotypic variation in disruption of intracellular LDL-derived cholesterol processing

    Marie T. Vanier;Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse;Robert Rousson;Noureddine Gazzah

  • Recommendations on the diagnosis and management of Niemann-Pick disease type C

    James E. Wraith;Matthias R. Baumgartner;Bruno Bembi;Athanasios Covanis

  • Secondary lipid accumulation in lysosomal disease

    Steven U. Walkley;Marie T. Vanier

  • Lipid changes in Niemann-Pick disease type C brain: personal experience and review of the literature.

    Marie T. Vanier

  • Niemann-Pick C1 Disease: Correlations between NPC1 Mutations, Levels of NPC1 Protein, and Phenotypes Emphasize the Functional Significance of the Putative Sterol-Sensing Domain and of the Cysteine-Rich Luminal Loop

    Gilles Millat;Christophe Marçais;Catherine Tomasetto;Karim Chikh

  • Consensus clinical management guidelines for Niemann-Pick disease type C.

    Tarekegn Geberhiwot;Alessandro Moro;Andrea Dardis;Uma Ramaswami

  • Niemann-Pick disease group C: clinical variability and diagnosis based on defective cholesterol esterification. A collaborative study on 70 patients.

    Marie T. Vanier;David A. Wenger;Marcella E. Comly;Robert Rousson

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter G. Pentchev
Peter G. Pentchev National Institutes of Health
Kunihiko Suzuki
Kunihiko Suzuki University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
David A. Wenger
David A. Wenger Thomas Jefferson University
Kinuko Suzuki
Kinuko Suzuki University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Steven U. Walkley
Steven U. Walkley Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Frits A. Wijburg
Frits A. Wijburg University of Amsterdam
Lars Svennerholm
Lars Svennerholm University of Gothenburg
Thierry Levade
Thierry Levade Paul Sabatier University
Roscoe O. Brady
Roscoe O. Brady Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Patrick Aubourg
Patrick Aubourg University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up numerous opportunities beyond the traditional MD pathway. Many students choose to advance their healthcare careers through flexible online degrees that balance affordability and accreditation.

For those interested in advanced practice, cheap online fnp programs offer a pathway to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner with minimal financial burden. If you’re at the beginning of your nursing journey, consider enrolling in one of the cheapest bsn programs online to obtain your Bachelor of Science in Nursing at a lower cost.

Students looking to reach the highest levels of expertise or pursue a career in nursing research or academia might be interested in earning an online phd in nursing. For registered nurses aiming to advance their credentials, the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs allow RNs to seamlessly upgrade their qualifications without disrupting their current employment.

These online options provide accessible, affordable, and accredited avenues for diverse medical careers, ensuring that learners can find a pathway suited to their goals and budgets.

Best Scientists Citing Marie T. Vanier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles