World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
14181
World Ranking
2115
National Ranking
862

J. D. Winningham publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. D. Winningham sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 267 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

J. D. Winningham D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. D. Winningham sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. D. Winningham is affiliated with the Southwest Research Institute in the United States. Their research focuses broadly on the fields of physics and astronomy, with specific contributions to astronomy and astrophysics. The topics of their work primarily include planetary science and exploration.

Winningham's publication record includes work in recognized scientific venues. Recent papers have appeared in the journal Nature. One example of their recent work is titled Author Correction: The loss of ions from Venus through the plasma wake, published in 2022.

The scientist has collaborated with a number of frequent co-authors in their research. These include:

  • S. Barabash
  • A. Fedorov
  • J. J. Sauvaud
  • R. Lundin
  • C. T. Russell

Winningham's focus on planetary science and exploration is reflected in their analysis of ion loss from Venus, contributing to understanding planetary atmospheres and plasma interactions. Their research outputs tend to be published in high-impact journals within the astronomy and astrophysics community.

Best Publications

  • PEACE: A PLASMA ELECTRON AND CURRENT EXPERIMENT

    A. D. Johnstone;C. Alsop;S. Burge;P. J. Carter

  • Penetration of magnetosheath plasma to low altitudes through the dayside magnetospheric cusps

    Unknown

  • F layer ionization patches in the polar cap

    E. J. Weber;J. Buchau;J. G. Moore;J. R. Sharber

  • The latitudinal morphology of 10‐eV to 10‐keV electron fluxes during magnetically quiet and disturbed times in the 2100–0300 MLT sector

    Unknown

  • The Analyser of Space Plasmas and Energetic Atoms (ASPERA-4) for the Venus Express mission

    S. Barabash;R. Lundin;H. Andersson;K. Brinkfeldt

  • Polar views of the Earth's aurora with Dynamics Explorer

    L. A. Frank;J. D. Craven;J. L. Burch;J. D. Winningham

  • The theta aurora

    L. A. Frank;J. D. Craven;D. A. Gurnett;S. D. Shawhan

  • Polar cap auroral electron fluxes observed with Isis 1

    Unknown

  • Correlated low‐frequency electric and magnetic noise along the auroral field lines

    D. A. Gurnett;R. L. Huff;J. D. Menietti;J. L. Burch

  • The Analyzer of Space Plasmas and Energetic Atoms (ASPERA-3) for the Mars Express Mission

    Unknown

  • Transverse acceleration of oxygen ions by electromagnetic ion cyclotron resonance with broad band left‐hand polarized waves

    Unknown

  • IMF By ‐dependent plasma flow and Birkeland currents in the dayside magnetosphere: 1. Dynamics Explorer observations

    J. L. Burch;P. H. Reiff;J. D. Menietti;R. A. Heelis

  • Simultaneous density and electric field fluctuation spectra associated with velocity shears in the auroral oval

    Sunanda Basu;Santimay Basu;E. MacKenzie;P. F. Fougere

  • Determination of auroral electrostatic potentials using high- and low-altitude particle distributions

    P. H. Reiff;H. L. Collin;J. D. Craven;J. L. Burch

  • Ogo 5 observations of upstream waves in the interplanetary medium - Discrete wave packets

    C. T. Russell;D. D. Childers;P. J. Coleman

  • The loss of ions from Venus through the plasma wake

    S. Barabash;A. Fedorov;J. J. Sauvaud;R. Lundin

  • Simultaneous observations of particle precipitations and auroral emissions by the Isis 2 satellite in the 19–24 MLT sector

    A. T. Y. Lui;D. Venkatesan;C. D. Anger;S. I. Akasofu

  • RPC-IES: The Ion and Electron Sensor of the Rosetta Plasma Consortium

    J. L. Burch;R. Goldstein;T. E. Cravens;W. C. Gibson

  • Satellite observations of suprathermal electron bursts

    A. D. Johnstone;J. D. Winningham

  • Plasma injection and transport in the mid‐altitude polar cusp

    J. L. Burch;P. H. Reiff;R. A. Heelis;J. D. Winningham

  • Characterization of the IMF By ‐dependent field‐aligned currents in the cleft region based on DE 2 observations

    S. Taguchi;M. Sugiura;J. D. Winningham;J. A. Slavin

  • Ionospheric convection signatures observed by De 2 during northward interplanetary magnetic field

    R. A. Heelis;P. H. Reiff;J. D. Winningham;W. B. Hanson

  • Carbon dioxide photoelectron energy peaks at Mars

    R. A. Frahm;J. D. Winningham;J. R. Sharber;J. R. Scherrer

  • Dependence of substorm occurrence probability on the interplanetary magnetic field and on the size of the auroral oval

    Y. Kamide;P. D. Perreault;S. I. Akasofu;J. D. Winningham

  • Plasma Morphology at Mars. ASPERA-3 Observations

    E. Dubinin;M. Fränz;J. Woch;E. Roussos

  • Ion flow at comet Halley

    A. Johnstone;A. Coates;S. Kellock;B. Wilken

  • Dependence of the latitude of the cleft on the interplanetary magnetic field and substorm activity

    Y. Kamide;J. L. Burch;J. D. Winningham;S. I. Akasofu

  • The relationships between high-latitude convection reversals and the energetic particle morphology observed by Atmosphere Explorer

    R.A. Heelis;J.D. Winningham;W.B. Hanson;J.L. Burch

  • Equion, an Equatorial Ionospheric Irregularity Experiment

    F. A. Morse;B. C. Edgar;H. C. Koons;C. J. Rice

Frequent Co-Authors

R. A. Frahm
R. A. Frahm Southwest Research Institute
Andrew J. Coates
Andrew J. Coates University College London
Rickard Lundin
Rickard Lundin Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Hannu E. J. Koskinen
Hannu E. J. Koskinen University of Helsinki
Mats Holmström
Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics
S. Barabash
S. Barabash Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Esa Kallio
Esa Kallio Aalto University
Peter Wurz
Peter Wurz University of Bern
James L. Burch
James L. Burch Southwest Research Institute
Janet U. Kozyra
Janet U. Kozyra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into human-environment interactions and societal impacts on natural resources. This interdisciplinary approach enhances career prospects in sustainability, policy analysis, and community planning.

Professionals aiming to advance their leadership skills in environmental education or administration may consider exploring specialized doctoral programs online no dissertation, which offer flexibility without the traditional dissertation requirement. This option allows candidates to focus on applied research and practical solutions for environmental challenges.

If you're currently invested in education, transitioning through eds to edd programs online enables you to deepen your knowledge and gain credentials suited for higher-level roles in academia, policy development, or environmental program management. These pathways often blend theoretical learning with practical leadership experiences.

Additionally, those looking to expand their impact in community wellness with a focus on environmental health might find the cheapest dsw program a valuable resource. Affordable doctorate degrees in social work combine environmental justice with social equity, preparing graduates to advocate for healthier, sustainable communities.

Best Scientists Citing J. D. Winningham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles