World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
7385
World Ranking
5857
National Ranking
106

Yoshifumi Futaana publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoshifumi Futaana sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 359 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Yoshifumi Futaana D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoshifumi Futaana sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yoshifumi Futaana is affiliated with the Swedish Institute of Space Physics in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on Physics and Astronomy, with a significant emphasis on Astronomy and Astrophysics. The scope of their work also extends to interdisciplinary areas such as Molecular Biology, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, and Nuclear and High Energy Physics.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Space Exploration and Technology

Among their recent publications are:

  • Pre-flight Calibration and Near-Earth Commissioning Results of the Mercury Plasma Particle Experiment (MPPE) Onboard MMO (Mio), 2021, Space Science Reviews
  • Three-Dimensional Configuration of Induced Magnetic Fields Around Mars, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • The Venusian Atmospheric Oxygen Ion Escape: Extrapolation to the Early Solar System, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • An Active Plume Eruption on Europa During Galileo Flyby E26 as Indicated by Energetic Proton Depletions, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • CME Magnetic Structure and IMF Preconditioning Affecting SEP Transport, 2021, Space Weather

Futaana has frequently collaborated with several co-authors including:

  • S. Barabash
  • H. Nilsson
  • Mats Holmström
  • Moa Persson
  • Robin Ramstad

The venues where their work has commonly appeared include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Space Science Reviews

This extensive publication record reflects involvement across prominent journals and repositories relevant to space physics and planetary science.

Best Publications

  • Moon-related nonthermal ions observed by Nozomi: Species, sources, and generation mechanisms

    Yoshifumi Futaana;Shinobu Machida;Yoshifumi Saito;Ayako Matsuoka

  • The loss of ions from Venus through the plasma wake

    S. Barabash;A. Fedorov;J. J. Sauvaud;R. Lundin

  • First observation of a mini-magnetosphere above a lunar magnetic anomaly using energetic neutral atoms

    Martin Wieser;Stas Barabash;Yoshifumi Futaana;Mats Holmström

  • Extremely high reflection of solar wind protons as neutral hydrogen atoms from regolith in space

    Martin Wieser;Stas Barabash;Yoshifumi Futaana;Mats Holmström

  • Strong influence of lunar crustal fields on the solar wind flow

    Charles Lue;Charles Lue;Yoshifumi Futaana;Stas Barabash;Martin Wieser

  • Heavy ion escape from Mars, influence from solar wind conditions and crustal magnetic fields

    Hans Nilsson;Niklas J.T. Edberg;Gabriella Stenberg;Stas Barabash

  • Solar Wind Interaction and Impact on the Venus Atmosphere

    Yoshifumi Futaana;Gabriella Stenberg Wieser;Stas Barabash;Janet G. Luhmann

  • The Martian atmospheric ion escape rate dependence on solar wind and solar EUV conditions: 1. Seven years of Mars Express observations

    Robin Ramstad;Stas Barabash;Yoshifumi Futaana;Hans Nilsson

  • Mars Express and Venus Express multi-point observations of geoeffective solar flare events in December 2006

    Y. Futaana;S. Barabash;M. Yamauchi;S. McKenna-Lawlor

  • Pumping out the atmosphere of Mars through solar wind pressure pulses

    Niklas Edberg;Niklas Edberg;H. Nilsson;A. O. Williams;M. Lester

  • Mass composition of the escaping plasma at Mars

    E. Carlsson;E. Carlsson;A. Fedorov;S. Barabash;E. Budnik

  • Long‐term variation in the cloud‐tracked zonal velocities at the cloud top of Venus deduced from Venus Express VMC images

    Toru Kouyama;Takeshi Imamura;Masato Nakamura;Takehiko Satoh

  • Inner heliosphere MHD modeling system applicable to space weather forecasting for the other planets

    D. Shiota;R. Kataoka;Y. Miyoshi;T. Hara

  • Observations of aurorae by SPICAM ultraviolet spectrograph on board Mars Express: Simultaneous ASPERA‐3 and MARSIS measurements

    F. Leblanc;O. Witasse;J. Lilensten;R. A. Frahm

  • Initial performance of the radio occultation experiment in the Venus orbiter mission Akatsuki

    Takeshi Imamura;Hiroki Ando;Silvia Tellmann;Martin Pätzold

  • Location of the bow shock and ion composition boundaries at Venus - initial determinations from Venus Express ASPERA-4

    C. Martinecz;M. Fränz;J. Woch;N. Krupp

  • Measurements of the ion escape rates from Venus for solar minimum

    A. Fedorov;A. Fedorov;S. Barabash;J.-A. Sauvaud;J.-A. Sauvaud;Y. Futaana

  • The interaction between the Moon and the solar wind

    Mats Holmström;Shahab Fatemi;Yoshifumi Futaana;Hans Nilsson

  • Ion escape from Mars as a function of solar wind conditions: A statistical study

    Hans Nilsson;Ella Carlsson;David A. Brain;Masatoshi Yamauchi

  • Investigation of the solar wind-Moon interaction onboard Chandrayaan-1 mission with the SARA experiment

    Stas Barabash;Anil Bhardwaj;Martin Wieser;R. Sridharan

  • Atmospheric erosion of Venus during stormy space weather

    Niklas J. T. Edberg;H. Nilsson;Y. Futaana;G. Stenberg

  • Analysis of the mass composition of the escaping plasma at Mars

    Ella Carlsson;Stas Barabash;A. Fedorov;E. Budnik

Frequent Co-Authors

Stas Barabash
Stas Barabash Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Peter Wurz
Peter Wurz University of Bern
Mats Holmström
Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics
S. Barabash
S. Barabash Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Rickard Lundin
Rickard Lundin Swedish Institute of Space Physics
R. A. Frahm
R. A. Frahm Southwest Research Institute
Esa Kallio
Esa Kallio Aalto University
Hans Nilsson
Hans Nilsson Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Tielong Zhang
Tielong Zhang Austrian Academy of Sciences
Hannu E. J. Koskinen
Hannu E. J. Koskinen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise beyond a bachelor’s in Environmental Sciences, there are various online degree options that can complement this field. Many students explore programs like an online edd no dissertation to specialize in education administration or environmental policy education without the added dissertation burden.

Transitioning from a Master’s in Education to a Doctorate can be streamlined through eds to edd bridge programs online, which are ideal for professionals aiming to lead educational initiatives focused on sustainability and environmental awareness.

Additionally, for those pursuing a career intersecting social work and the environment, understanding community impact can be enhanced through affordable, flexible options such as dsw programs. These prepare students to address social determinants affecting environmental justice.

Lastly, a broad foundation can be built by enrolling in an online general studies degree affordable, offering interdisciplinary knowledge crucial for diverse career pathways within environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Yoshifumi Futaana

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles