World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
61
Citations
12626
World Ranking
2792
National Ranking
1109

Janet U. Kozyra publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet U. Kozyra sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 259 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Janet U. Kozyra D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet U. Kozyra sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Janet U. Kozyra is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Physics and Astronomy, with a focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics as a key subfield.

Their work addresses topics related to Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics, Astro and Planetary Science, and Planetary Science and Exploration. These topics represent the core areas in which they have published research findings.

  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Planetary Science and Exploration

Janet U. Kozyra collaborates regularly with several researchers, including:

  • N. Buzulukova
  • Timothy Fuller-Rowell
  • A. Dorodnitsyn

Their contributions to scientific knowledge are also recognized by the American Geophysical Union, which awarded them the title of Fellow in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Dayside global ionospheric response to the major interplanetary events of October 29–30, 2003 “Halloween Storms”

    A. J. Mannucci;B. T. Tsurutani;B. A. Iijima;A. Komjathy

  • Global dayside ionospheric uplift and enhancement associated with interplanetary electric fields

    Bruce Tsurutani;Anthony Mannucci;Byron Iijima;Mangalathayil Ali Abdu

  • The Analyser of Space Plasmas and Energetic Atoms (ASPERA-4) for the Venus Express mission

    S. Barabash;R. Lundin;H. Andersson;K. Brinkfeldt

  • Effects of energetic heavy ions on electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave generation in the plasmapause region

    J. U. Kozyra;T. E. Cravens;A. F. Nagy;E. G. Fontheim

  • Dominant role of the asymmetric ring current in producing the stormtime Dst

    M. W. Liemohn;J. U. Kozyra;M. F. Thomsen;J. L. Roeder

  • Electron precipitation and related aeronomy of the Jovian thermosphere and ionosphere

    J. H. Waite;T. E. Cravens;J. Kozyra;A. F. Nagy

  • Collisional losses of ring current ions

    V. K. Jordanova;L. M. Kistler;J. U. Kozyra;G. V. Khazanov

  • The Analyzer of Space Plasmas and Energetic Atoms (ASPERA-3) for the Mars Express Mission

    Unknown

  • Solar Wind-Induced Atmospheric Erosion at Mars: First Results from ASPERA-3 on Mars Express

    R. Lundin;S. Barabash;H. Andersson;M. Holmström

  • Dayside pickup oxygen ion precipitation at Venus and Mars: Spatial distributions, energy deposition and consequences

    J. G. Luhmann;J. U. Kozyra

  • High‐altitude energy source(s) for stable auroral red arcs

    J. U. Kozyra;A. F. Nagy;D. W. Slater

  • Kinetic model of the ring current-atmosphere interactions

    V. K. Jordanova;J. U. Kozyra;A. F. Nagy;G. V. Khazanov

  • The loss of ions from Venus through the plasma wake

    S. Barabash;A. Fedorov;J. J. Sauvaud;R. Lundin

  • The role of ring current O+ in the formation of stable auroral red arcs

    J. U. Kozyra;E. G. Shelley;R. H. Comfort;L. H. Brace

  • Analysis of early phase ring current recovery mechanisms during geomagnetic storms

    M. W. Liemohn;J. U. Kozyra;V. K. Jordanova;G. V. Khazanov

  • Lifetime of ring current particles due to coulomb collisions in the plasmasphere

    M.-C. Fok;J. U. Kozyra;A. F. Nagy;T. E. Cravens

  • Electron impact ionization in the vicinity of comets

    T. E. Cravens;J. U. Kozyra;A. F. Nagy;T. I. Gombosi

  • Decay of equatorial ring current ions and associated aeronomical consequences

    M. C. Fok;J. U. Kozyra;A. F. Nagy;C. E. Rasmussen

  • Enhanced NOx in 2006 linked to strong upper stratospheric Arctic vortex

    C. E. Randall;V. L. Harvey;C. S. Singleton;P. F. Bernath

  • Three-dimensional ring current decay model

    Mei Ching Fok;Thomas E. Moore;Janet U. Kozyra;George C. Ho

  • The natural thermostat of nitric oxide emission at 5.3 μm in the thermosphere observed during the solar storms of April 2002

    Martin G. Mlynczak;F. Javier Martin‐torres;James Russell;Ken Beaumont

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W. Liemohn
Michael W. Liemohn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hannu E. J. Koskinen
Hannu E. J. Koskinen University of Helsinki
Rickard Lundin
Rickard Lundin Swedish Institute of Space Physics
R. A. Frahm
R. A. Frahm Southwest Research Institute
Andrew J. Coates
Andrew J. Coates University College London
Esa Kallio
Esa Kallio Aalto University
Mats Holmström
Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Janet G. Luhmann
Janet G. Luhmann University of California, Berkeley
Peter Wurz
Peter Wurz University of Bern
Joachim Woch
Joachim Woch Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their career options beyond Environmental Sciences, various online degrees offer flexible and specialized pathways. Public administration professionals, for instance, can enhance their qualifications by exploring mpa one year programs, which focus on leadership and policy development relevant to environmental governance.

Sociology graduates gain a unique perspective on human behavior and societal trends that directly impact environmental policies. Earning an online bachelors in sociology can prepare students for roles in community planning and environmental advocacy.

For educators and professionals aiming to advance their expertise without the lengthy commitment of traditional doctoral research, online ed d programs without dissertation offer accessible avenues to higher education. These programs often emphasize practical applications, which can support environmental education initiatives.

Additionally, institutions ranked among the best eds to edd programs provide pathways for educational leaders to deepen their impact on policy and curriculum related to sustainability and environmental stewardship. Together, these degrees create diverse opportunities for career growth in fields connected to environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Janet U. Kozyra

Trending Scientists