World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Helen J. Chenery

Helen J. Chenery

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
4619
World Ranking
8344
National Ranking
492

Helen J. Chenery publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen J. Chenery sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Helen J. Chenery D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen J. Chenery sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helen J. Chenery is affiliated with Bond University in Australia. Their academic profile includes contributions to research at this institution.

No specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are listed for Helen J. Chenery. Similarly, no information is provided regarding book publications, main fields, subfields of study, or main research topics.

There are no awards associated with this researcher based on the provided data.

Due to the limited available data, the profile reflects only the confirmed affiliation and absence of detailed publication or research information.

Best Publications

  • Language disorders in dementia of the Alzheimer type.

    Bruce E. Murdoch;Helen J. Chenery;Vicki Wilks;Richard S. Boyle

  • Conversations Between Carers and People With Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Analysis Using Leximancer

    Julia Cretchley;Cindy Gallois;Helen Chenery;Andrew Smith

  • Brain activity during automatic semantic priming revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    David A. Copland;Greig I. de Zubicaray;Katie McMahon;Stephen J. Wilson

  • Language impairment in Parkinson's disease

    Fiona M. Lewis;Leonard L. Lapointe;Bruce E. Murdoch;Helen J. Chenery

  • Mobile Phones in Research and Treatment: Ethical Guidelines and Future Directions

    Adrian Carter;Jacki Liddle;Wayne Hall;Wayne Hall;Helen Chenery

  • Multiple Sclerosis: Associated Speech and Language Disorders

    Fiona J. Fitz Gerald;Bruce E. Murdoch;Helen J. Chenery

  • Memory and communication support in dementia: Research-based strategies for caregivers

    Erin R. Smith;Megan Broughton;Rosemary Baker;Nancy A. Pachana

  • Evaluation of a caregiver education program to support memory and communication in dementia: A controlled pretest–posttest study with nursing home staff

    Megan Broughton;Erin R. Smith;Rosemary Baker;Anthony J. Angwin

  • Semantic abilities in dementia of the Alzheimer type. 1. Lexical semantics.

    Shanne R. Smith;Bruce E. Murdoch;Helen J. Chenery

  • Respiratory Function in Parkinson's Subjects Exhibiting a Perceptible Speech Deficit

    Bruce E. Murdoch;Helen J. Chenery;Simon Bowler;John C. L. Ingram

  • Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.

    Catharine M. Pettigrew;Bruce E. Murdoch;Curtis W. Ponton;Simon Finnigan

  • Semantic and affective priming as a function of stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease

    Joanna E. Castner;Helen J. Chenery;David A. Copland;Terry J. Coyne

  • Perceptual speech characteristics of dysarthric speakers following severe closed head injury

    Deborah G. Theodoros;Bruce E. Murdoch;Helen J. Chenery

  • Memory and communication support strategies in dementia: effect of a training program for informal caregivers.

    Jacki Liddle;Erin R. Smith-Conway;Rosemary Baker;Anthony J. Angwin

  • Towards a conceptualization of language and cognitive impairment in closed-head injury : use of clinical measures

    F J Hinchliffe;B E Murdoch;H J Chenery

  • Semantic priming in Parkinson's disease: evidence for delayed spreading activation.

    Wendy L. Arnott;Helen J. Chenery;Bruce E. Murdoch;Peter A. Silburn

  • Measuring the Lifespace of People With Parkinson’s Disease Using Smartphones: Proof of Principle

    Jacki Liddle;David Ireland;Simon J McBride;Sandra G Brauer

  • The basal ganglia circuits, dopamine, and ambiguous word processing: a neurobiological account of priming studies in Parkinson's disease.

    Helen J. Chenery;Anthony J. Angwin;David A. Copland

  • Complex language functions and subcortical mechanisms: Evidence from Huntington's disease and patients with non‐thalamic subcortical lesions

    Helen J. Chenery;David A. Copland;Bruce E. Murdoch

  • Summation of semantic priming and complex sentence comprehension in Parkinson's disease

    Anthony J. Angwin;Helen J. Chenery;David A. Copland;Bruce E. Murdoch

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Copland
David A. Copland University of Queensland
Bruce E. Murdoch
Bruce E. Murdoch University of Queensland
Peter A. Silburn
Peter A. Silburn University of Queensland
John Ingram
John Ingram University of Oxford
Cindy Gallois
Cindy Gallois University of Queensland
Gerard J. Byrne
Gerard J. Byrne University of Queensland
Michael S. Humphreys
Michael S. Humphreys University of Queensland
Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
Wayne Hall
Wayne Hall University of Queensland
Katie L. McMahon
Katie L. McMahon Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up numerous online degree options and professional pathways, particularly in counseling and therapy. Many aspiring professionals are choosing flexible online programs to prepare for careers as Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs) or therapists. Whether you plan to practice in California, Arizona, Washington, or elsewhere, understanding the essential steps and requirements is crucial.

The journey to become a licensed counselor involves earning a relevant master’s degree, completing supervised clinical experience, and passing state-required exams. If you are curious about how to become a licensed therapist in San Jose, or want to know about how to become a licensed therapist in Scottsdale, each region has its own regulations.

You can also learn more about licensed therapist requirements in Santa Ana and comprehensive Seattle licensed therapist education requirements to better understand the licensing process. Exploring these requirements will help you select the right degree and anticipate the steps needed for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Helen J. Chenery

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles