World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael S. Humphreys

Michael S. Humphreys

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8715 8138 513 502 168 10540

Michael S. Humphreys publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael S. Humphreys between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael S. Humphreys published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2007. 2 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2007. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 4 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 5 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1968 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael S. Humphreys: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 1
1971 1
1972 4
1973 3
1974 1
1975 2
1976 4
1977 0
1978 1
1979 5
1980 3
1981 1
1982 0
1983 8
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 4
1990 4
1991 1
1992 0
1993 4
1994 5
1995 2
1996 5
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 5
2002 5
2003 8
2004 8
2005 7
2006 6
2007 10
2008 1
2009 6
2010 8
2011 4
2012 8
2013 1
2014 3
2015 0
2016 8
2017 3
2018 3
2019 0
2020 3
2021 1
2022 3
2023 2
2024 0
2025 2
Total 177
Download as CSV

Michael S. Humphreys publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Humphreys sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 168
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael S. Humphreys D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Humphreys sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael S. Humphreys is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and psychology, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and memory processes.

Their published work covers various topics including memory processes and influences, cognitive functions and memory, neural and behavioral psychology studies, child and animal learning development, consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, and digital marketing and social media.

Recent papers by Michael S. Humphreys include:

  • How semantic processing affects recognition memory, 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • Explaining short-term memory phenomena with an integrated episodic/semantic framework of long-term memory, 2020, Cognitive Psychology
  • Recognition memory: The probe, the returned signal, and the decision, 2023, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Additional recent notable papers within their research network include:

  • Shared Brand Equity, 2022, Journal of Advertising
  • Target learning in event-based prospective memory, 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Michael S. Humphreys has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including Shayne Loft, Oliver Baumann, Gerald Tehan, Rupak Shivakoti, and Sameera A. Talegawkar.

Their research has been published across a range of academic venues, notably:

  • Journal of Advertising
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Their main fields of study focus on Neuroscience and Psychology, with subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Marketing, and Sociology and Political Science.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping

    Andrew E. Smith;Michael S. Humphreys

  • Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing.

    Michael S. Humphreys;William Revelle

  • Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology

    Michael S. Humphreys;David H. Krantz;Richard Atkinson;R. Duncan Luce

  • Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks.

    Michael S. Humphreys;John D. Bain;Ray Pike

  • The interactive effect of personality, time of day, and caffeine: A test of the arousal model.

    William Revelle;Michael S. Humphreys;Lisa Simon;Kirby Gilliland

  • A Context Noise Model of Episodic Word Recognition

    Simon Dennis;Michael S. Humphreys

  • Sponsorship-Linked Marketing: The Role of Articulation in Memory

    T. Bettina Cornwell;Michael S. Humphreys;Angela M. Maguire;Clinton S. Weeks

  • ERP 'old/new' effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)

    Simon John Finnigan;Michael S Humphreys;Simon John Dennis;Gina Geffen

  • Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval

    Michael S. Humphreys

  • An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations : analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall

    Mark Chappell;Michael S. Humphreys

  • Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory.

    Michael S. Humphreys

  • Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models.

    Michael S. Humphreys;Ray Pike;John D. Bain;Gerald Tehan

  • Phonemic-similarity effects in good vs. poor readers.

    James W. Hall;Kim P. Wilson;Michael S. Humphreys;Margaret B. Tinzmann

  • Toward a theory of human memory: Data structures and access processes

    Michael S. Humphreys;Janet Wiles;Simon Dennis

  • Recognition memory: A cue and information analysis

    Michael S. Humphreys;John D. Bain

  • An examination of the relationship between workload and fatigue within and across consecutive days of work: Is the relationship static or dynamic?

    Michelle R. Grech;Andrew Neal;Gillian B. Yeo;Michael Humphreys

  • Memory and communication support in dementia: Research-based strategies for caregivers

    Erin R. Smith;Megan Broughton;Rosemary Baker;Nancy A. Pachana

  • Evaluation of a caregiver education program to support memory and communication in dementia: A controlled pretest–posttest study with nursing home staff

    Megan Broughton;Erin R. Smith;Rosemary Baker;Anthony J. Angwin

  • A theory and model of conflict detection in air traffic control: incorporating environmental constraints.

    Shayne Loft;Scott Bolland;Michael S. Humphreys;Andrew Neal

  • Effects of closed-head injury on attentional processes: An information-processing stage analysis

    David H. K. Shum;Ken McFarland;John D. Bain;Michael S. Humphreys

  • Sponsorship-linked marketing: The role of articulation in memory

    T. Cornwell;Michael Humphreys;Angela Maguire;Clinton Weeks

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
T. Bettina Cornwell
T. Bettina Cornwell University of Oregon
Gerard J. Byrne
Gerard J. Byrne University of Queensland
Helen J. Chenery
Helen J. Chenery Bond University
Cindy Gallois
Cindy Gallois University of Queensland
David A. Copland
David A. Copland University of Queensland
William Revelle
William Revelle Northwestern University
Katie L. McMahon
Katie L. McMahon Queensland University of Technology
Greig I. de Zubicaray
Greig I. de Zubicaray Queensland University of Technology
Gina M. Geffen
Gina M. Geffen University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens the door to diverse online programs and a range of career opportunities in the mental health field. Many students choose to earn their psychology degree online to balance studies with work or family commitments. These programs often provide flexible coursework and pave the way for licensure as a counselor or therapist.

Becoming a licensed therapist requires both academic training and supervised clinical experience. Different locations may have their own requirements. If you’re interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Gilbert or becoming a licensed therapist in Glendale, you’ll need to follow specific state guidelines for education, exams, and supervised hours.

Similarly, requirements for becoming a licensed therapist in Greensboro or how to become a licensed therapist in Henderson will differ. Reviewing these resources will help you understand your next steps, whether you choose counseling, clinical psychology, or another pathway in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S. Humphreys

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles