World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
15189
World Ranking
3361
National Ranking
1900

Joel S. Warm publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel S. Warm sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 248 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joel S. Warm D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel S. Warm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1986 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Joel S. Warm is affiliated with the United States Air Force Research Laboratory in the United States. Their career is associated with research conducted within this institution, contributing to the scientific and technological efforts in defense and aerospace domains.

They have been recognized for their contributions by being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1986. This award highlights a notable milestone in their professional career.

There are no listed recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work available in the provided data.

Best Publications

  • Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful

    Joel S. Warm;Raja Parasuraman;Gerald Matthews

  • A dynamic model of stress, and sustained attention

    P. A. Hancock;Joel S. Warm

  • Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry.

    Gerald Matthews;Sian E. Campbell;Shona Falconer;Lucy A. Joyner

  • Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance.

    Judi E. See;Steven R. Howe;Joel S. Warm;William N. Dember

  • The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness.

    Rebecca A. Grier;Joel S. Warm;William N. Dember;Gerald Matthews

  • Brain systems of vigilance.

    Raja Parasuraman;Joel S. Warm;Judi E. See

  • Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Jeremy T. Nelson;R. Andy McKinley;Edward J. Golob;Joel S. Warm

  • The Effects of Signal Salience and Caffeine on Performance, Workload, and Stress in an Abbreviated Vigilance Task

    Jon G. Temple;Joel S. Warm;William N. Dember;Keith S. Jones

  • Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance.

    William S. Helton;Joel S. Warm

  • Sustained attention in human performance

    Joel S. Warm

  • Vigilance: Taxonomy And Utility

    Raja Parasuraman;Joel S. Warm;William N. Dember

  • Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention

    James L. Szalma;Joel S. Warm;Gerald Matthews;William N. Dember

  • The Psychophysics of Vigilance

    Joel S. Warm

  • Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving: Discriminating styles of workload regulation and their safety impacts

    Dyani J. Saxby;Gerald Matthews;Joel S. Warm;Edward M. Hitchcock

  • Automation cueing modulates cerebral blood flow and vigilance in a simulated air traffic control task

    Edward M. Hitchcock;Joel S. Warm;Gerald Matthews;William N. Dember

  • Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance

    William S. Helton;Todd D. Hollander;Joel S. Warm;Gerald Matthews

  • Vigilance and Signal Detection Theory: An Empirical Evaluation of Five Measures of Response Bias:

    Judi E. See;Joel S. Warm;William N. Dember;Steven R. Howe

  • Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention.

    Gerald Matthews;Joel S. Warm;Lauren E. Reinerman-Jones;Lisa K. Langheim

  • Optimism, pessimism, and false failure feedback: Effects on vigilance performance

    William S. Helton;William N. Dember;Joel S. Warm;Gerald Matthews

  • Psychology of Perception

    William N. Dember;Joel S. Warm

Frequent Co-Authors

William N. Dember
William N. Dember University of Cincinnati
Gerald Matthews
Gerald Matthews George Mason University
Raja Parasuraman
Raja Parasuraman George Mason University
Peter A. Hancock
Peter A. Hancock University of Central Florida
William S. Helton
William S. Helton George Mason University
James L. Szalma
James L. Szalma University of Central Florida
Thomas A. Stoffregen
Thomas A. Stoffregen University of Minnesota
David A. Washburn
David A. Washburn Georgia State University
Andrew Paul Smith
Andrew Paul Smith Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career opportunities, particularly in mental health services. Many students pursue specialized fields such as substance abuse counseling, which is in high demand nationwide. While online psychology degrees can prepare graduates for a range of roles, becoming a certified counselor often involves meeting state-specific requirements.

For example, those interested in working in Arizona can explore the Scottsdale substance abuse counselor certification requirements to understand education, training, and licensing steps. If you’re considering a career in Washington State, learning about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Seattle or the Spokane substance abuse counselor certification requirements can provide valuable insights.

Alternatively, those looking toward the Midwest can review guidance on how to become a substance abuse counselor in St. Louis. Each pathway has unique local regulations, so it’s crucial to research your state’s specific criteria. Pursuing an online psychology degree can be a flexible way to start building essential knowledge for a rewarding career in behavioral health.

Best Scientists Citing Joel S. Warm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles