World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 159 54 46 29 23 738 105430

Eduardo Salas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eduardo Salas between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eduardo Salas published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 19.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2017. 24 of the 905 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2017. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 8 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 19 publications 1993: 17 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 26 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 29 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 47 publications 2009: 37 publications 2010: 42 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 35 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 58 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 44 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 10 publications
1980 2025

905 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eduardo Salas: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 2
1985 2
1986 1
1987 8
1988 3
1989 9
1990 7
1991 8
1992 19
1993 17
1994 7
1995 14
1996 12
1997 19
1998 26
1999 14
2000 17
2001 23
2002 15
2003 16
2004 29
2005 30
2006 28
2007 28
2008 47
2009 37
2010 42
2011 23
2012 41
2013 33
2014 35
2015 33
2016 23
2017 58
2018 23
2019 19
2020 44
2021 34
2022 12
2023 20
2024 14
2025 10
Total 905
Download as CSV

Eduardo Salas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduardo Salas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 705+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 738 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100 738
Download as CSV

Eduardo Salas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduardo Salas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 144+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 159 D-Index — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98 159
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2016 - APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association.
  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Eduardo Salas is affiliated with Rice University in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several related subfields including Plant Science, General Health Professions, Molecular Biology, Surgery, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist has published extensively on topics including Banana Cultivation and Research, Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Nematode Management and Characterization Studies, Pineapple and Bromelain Studies, Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management, Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment, and Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms.

Salas' publication record includes papers appearing in diverse venues. Frequent publication venues are:

  • International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
  • Revista Argentina de Neurocirugía

Selected recent papers include:

  • A Clinical-Genetic Risk Score for Predicting Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Development and Validation Study Involving Two Independent Prospective Cohorts, 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Teamwork and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review, 2024, Implementation Science
  • A Clinical-Genetic Score for Predicting Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: The OBEGEN Study, 2021, Journal of Personalized Medicine
  • Incorporating genetic and clinical data into the prediction of thromboembolism risk in patients with lymphoma, 2021, Cancer Medicine
  • Woolly Monkey-HBV Infection in Squirrel Monkeys as a Surrogate Nonhuman Primate Model of HBV Infection, 2020, Hepatology Communications

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Salas include:

  • Mario Araya
  • José Manuel Soria
  • Francisca Rosique
  • Juan Delgado
  • Andrés J. Muñoz Martín

Salas has been recognized by the American Psychological Association with the APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology in 2016 and was named a Fellow of the APA in 1994.

Best Publications

  • The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.

    John E. Mathieu;Tonia S. Heffner;Gerald F. Goodwin;Eduardo Salas

  • Shared mental models in expert team decision making.

    Janis A. Cannon-Bowers;Eduardo Salas;Sharolyn Converse

  • The Science of Training: A Decade of Progress

    Eduardo Salas;Janis A. Cannon-Bowers

  • Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation.

    Kurt Kraiger;J. Kevin Ford;Eduardo Salas

  • Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?:

    Eduardo Salas;Dana E. Sims;C. Shawn Burke

  • Toward an understanding of team performance and training.

    Eduardo Salas;Terry L. Dickinson;Sharolyn A. Converse;Scott I. Tannenbaum

  • What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis

    C. Shawn Burke;Kevin C. Stagl;Cameron Klein;Gerald F. Goodwin

  • On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments

    Eduardo Salas;Nancy J. Cooke;Michael A. Rosen

  • Influences of Individual and Situational Characteristics on Measures of Training Effectiveness

    John E. Mathieu;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Eduardo Salas

  • The Science of Training and Development in Organizations What Matters in Practice

    Eduardo Salas;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Kurt Kraiger;Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch

  • Reflections on shared cognition

    Janis A. Cannon-Bowers;Eduardo Salas

  • Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration

    C. Shawn Burke;Dana E. Sims;Elizabeth H. Lazzara;Eduardo Salas

  • Defining Competencies and Establishing Team Training Requirements

    Janis A. Cannon-Bowers;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Eduardo Salas;Catherine E. Volpe

  • Leadership capacity in teams

    David V Day;Peter Christian Gronn;Eduardo Salas

  • Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations.

    David P. Baker;Rachel Day;Eduardo Salas

  • The transfer of training: What really matters.

    Rebecca Grossman;Eduardo Salas

  • Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration.

    Brian Mullen;Craig Johnson;Eduardo Salas

  • Taking stock of naturalistic decision making

    Raanan Lipshitz;Gary Klein;Judith Orasanu;Eduardo Salas

  • Meeting trainees' expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation.

    Scott I. Tannenbaum;John E. Mathieu;Eduardo Salas;Janis A. Cannon-Bowers

  • Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer

    J. Kevin Ford;Eleanor M. Smith;Daniel A. Weissbein;Stanley M. Gully

  • Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model.

    C. Shawn Burke;Kevin C. Stagl;Eduardo Salas;Linda Pierce

  • Does Team Training Improve Team Performance? A Meta-Analysis

    Eduardo Salas;Deborah DiazGranados;Cameron Klein;C. Shawn Burke

  • Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations

    Richard A. Guzzo;Eduardo Salas

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Rosen
Michael A. Rosen Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers University of Central Florida
C. Shawn Burke
C. Shawn Burke University of Central Florida
Stephen M. Fiore
Stephen M. Fiore University of Central Florida
James E. Driskell
James E. Driskell Florida Maxima Corporation
Clint A. Bowers
Clint A. Bowers University of Central Florida
Scott I. Tannenbaum
Scott I. Tannenbaum University at Albany, State University of New York
Nancy J. Cooke
Nancy J. Cooke Arizona State University
Michael T. Brannick
Michael T. Brannick University of South Florida
Brian Mullen
Brian Mullen Syracuse University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in pursuing a career in psychology or a related field, there are a range of online degree programs and career paths to consider. Many students explore specialties such as clinical psychology, counseling, or mental health services. Online psychology degrees can offer flexible learning with curricula designed to prepare you for licensure, certification, or further graduate study.

Becoming a licensed mental health professional requires understanding the education and credentialing requirements specific to your region. For example, those looking to become a mental health counselor in Buffalo will need to complete a recognized graduate program and obtain the necessary clinical experience. If you aim to meet Chandler mental health counselor certification requirements, it is essential to understand state-specific licensing and supervised hours.

Whether you want to become a mental health counselor in Charlotte or meet Chesapeake mental health counselor education requirements, researching accredited online programs and local regulations is key. Explore these pathways to find the best fit for your aspirations and location.

Best Scientists Citing Eduardo Salas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles