World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
13207
World Ranking
6060
National Ranking
3293

Winfred Arthur publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Winfred Arthur sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Winfred Arthur D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Winfred Arthur sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Winfred Arthur is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Psychology with particular attention to Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Safety Research.

The scientist's recent scholarly output reflects a concentration in topics such as Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Medical Education and Admissions, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Team Dynamics and Performance, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing.

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness, 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • The Relationship Between Team Deep-Level Diversity and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis of the Main Effect, Moderators, and Mediating Mechanisms, 2020, Journal of Management Studies
  • The Lazy or Dishonest Respondent: Detection and Prevention, 2020, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • A Meta-Analysis of Task and Training Characteristics that Contribute to or Attenuate the Effectiveness of the After-Action Review (or Debrief), 2022, Journal of Business and Psychology
  • What are We Measuring? Evaluations of Items Measuring Task Performance, Organizational Citizenship, Counterproductive, and Withdrawal Behaviors, 2021, Human Performance

Frequent co-authors in their research include Nathanael L. Keiser, Ellen Hagen, Felix George, Olabisi A. Atoba, and Inchul Cho. This collaboration pattern highlights recurrent partnerships in various research studies and publications.

Their work has appeared multiple times in key publication venues, with several papers in Human Performance, as well as contributions to the Journal of Business and Psychology, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Journal of Applied Psychology, and the Journal of Management Studies.

Winfred Arthur has also contributed to book literature, with at least one publication titled Developing Employer-Based Behavioral Traffic Safety Programs for Drivers in the Workplace, published by Transportation Research Board eBooks in 2022.

Recognition of their professional standing includes being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2006, an indication of their involvement and credentialing within the psychological research community.

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of training in organizations: a meta-analysis of design and evaluation features.

    Winfred Arthur Jr.;Winston Bennett Jr.;Pamela S. Edens;Suzanne T. Bell

  • Factors That Influence Skill Decay and Retention: A Quantitative Review and Analysis

    Winfred Arthur;Winston Bennett;Pamela L. Stanush;Theresa L. McNelly

  • The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: an assessment of its criterion-related validity.

    Winfred Arthur Jr.;Suzanne T. Bell;Anton J. Villado;Dennis Doverspike

  • Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships.

    Jeremy M. Beus;Stephanie C. Payne;Mindy E. Bergman;Winfred Arthur Jr.

  • Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: interview validity for entry-level jobs

    Allen I. Huffcutt;Winfred Arthur

  • Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance.

    Bryan D. Edwards;Eric Anthony Day;Winfred Arthur Jr.;Suzanne T. Bell

  • The five-factor model, conscientiousness, and driving accident involvement

    Winfred Arthur;William G. Graziano

  • Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test.

    Winfred Arthur;David V. Day

  • Relationships between Facets of Job Satisfaction and Task and Contextual Performance

    Bryan D. Edwards;Suzanne T. Bell;Winfred Arthur;Arlette D. Decuir

  • Knowledge structures and the acquisition of a complex skill.

    Eric Anthony Day;Winfred Arthur Jr.;Dennis Gettman

  • Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data.

    Allen I. Huffcutt;Winfred Arthur

  • A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS

    Unknown

  • The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice.

    Winfred Arthur Jr.;Anton J. Villado

  • Conducting Meta-Analysis Using SAS

    Winfred Arthur;Winston Bennett;Allen I. Huffcutt

  • Prediction of Vehicular Accident Involvement: A Meta-Analysis

    Winfred Arthur;Gerald V. Barret;Ralph A. Alexander

  • The Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Ratings: A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Methodological Factors

    David J. Woehr;Winfred Arthur

  • Predicting motor vehicle crash involvement from a personality measure and a driving knowledge test

    Winfred Arthur;Dennis Doverspike

  • Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: A conceptual and empirical re-examination of the assessment center construct-related validity paradox

    Winfred Arthur;David J. Woehr;Robyn Maldegen

  • Team Task Analysis: Identifying Tasks and Jobs That Are Team Based

    Winfred Arthur;Bryan D. Edwards;Suzanne T. Bell;Anton J. Villado

  • The Magnitude and Extent of Cheating and Response Distortion Effects on Unproctored Internet-Based Tests of Cognitive Ability and Personality

    Winfred Arthur;Ryan M. Glaze;Anton J. Villado;Jason E. Taylor

  • Locus of control and auditory selective attention as predictors of driving accident involvement: A comparative longitudinal investigation☆

    Winfred Arthur;Dennis Doverspike

Frequent Co-Authors

David V. Day
David V. Day Claremont McKenna College
William G. Graziano
William G. Graziano Purdue University West Lafayette
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
Eduardo Salas
Eduardo Salas Rice University
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career pathways. Many students consider careers as licensed mental health counselors, which often require a master’s degree in counseling or closely related fields.

Certification and licensing requirements vary by location. For instance, the Garland mental health counselor certification requirements and mental health counselor requirements in Gilbert specify supervised clinical hours and passing a national exam. Meanwhile, the Glendale mental health counselor education requirements emphasize accredited coursework and relevant field experience.

In Greensboro, completing the Greensboro mental health counselor certification requirements may involve continuing education after initial licensure. As you research online degrees, check each state’s rules to ensure your chosen program aligns with your desired career path.

Best Scientists Citing Winfred Arthur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles