World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
South Africa
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
27730
World Ranking
4481
National Ranking
3

Charles E. Lance publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Lance sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Charles E. Lance D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Lance sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in South Africa Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in South Africa Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in South Africa Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in South Africa Leader Award

Overview

Charles E. Lance is affiliated with the University of the Western Cape in South Africa. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a particular focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies, General Health Professions, and Demography.

The main topics covered in Charles E. Lance's work include Work-Family Balance Challenges, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Employment and Welfare Studies, Retirement, Disability, and Employment, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, and Family Caregiving in Mental Illness.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Charles E. Lance include Tracy L. Griggs, Claire E. Smith, Julie Holliday Wayne, Russell A. Matthews, and Marshall W. Pattie.

Publications by Charles E. Lance appeared in several academic journals, including Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Human Performance, The Gerontologist, International Journal of Psychology, and Group & Organization Management.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Charles E. Lance are as follows:

  • On States and Traits in Work-Family Research, 2024, Human Performance
  • A primer on method effects on observed correlations with examples, 2024, International Journal of Psychology
  • Causal cycles, causal intervals, and measurement in over-time studies, 2024, Group & Organization Management
  • Stability and change in levels of work-family conflict: A multi-study, longitudinal investigation, 2021, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Care Recipient Controlling and Manipulative Behavior and Caregiver Depressive Symptoms: The Role of Race, Caregiver Resentment, and Mutual Communal Behavior, 2021, The Gerontologist

Best Publications

  • A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research

    Robert J. Vandenberg;Charles E. Lance

  • What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research

    James M. Conway;Charles E. Lance

  • The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria What Did They Really Say

    Charles E. Lance;Marcus M. Butts;Lawrence C. Michels

  • Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing:

    Jean M. Twenge;Stacy M. Campbell;Brian J. Hoffman;Charles E. Lance

  • Examining the Causal Order of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment

    Robert J. Vandenberg;Charles E. Lance

  • Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model

    Lillian T. Eby;Deena M. Freeman;Michael C. Rush;Charles E. Lance

  • Risk Factors for Potentially Harmful Informal Caregiver Behavior

    Scott R. Beach;Richard Schulz;Gail M. Williamson;L. Stephen Miller

  • Residual Centering, Exploratory and Confirmatory Moderator Analysis, and Decomposition of Effects in Path Models Containing Interactions:

    Charles E. Lance

  • Method Effects, Measurement Error, and Substantive Conclusions

    Charles E. Lance;Bryan Dawson;David Birkelbach;Brian J. Hoffman

  • Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends : doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences

    Charles E. Lance;Robert J Vandenberg

  • What Is Method Variance and How Can We Cope With It? A Panel Discussion

    Michael T. Brannick;David Chan;James M. Conway;Charles E. Lance

  • A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data.

    Charles E. Lance;Carrie L. Noble;Steven E. Scullen

  • Latent Growth Models of Individual Change: The Case of Newcomer Adjustment.

    Charles E. Lance;Robert J. Vandenberg;Robin M. Self

  • Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis.

    Lisa E. Baranik;Laura J. Stanley;Bethany H. Bynum;Charles E. Lance

  • Individual differences in authenticity and mindfulness as predictors of verbal defensiveness

    Chad E. Lakey;Michael H. Kernis;Whitney L. Heppner;Charles E. Lance

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version in Healthy Adults and Application to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Robert M. Roth;Charles E. Lance;Peter K. Isquith;Adina S. Fischer

  • A Comparison Between Bottom–Up, Top–Down, and Bidirectional Models of Relationships Between Global and Life Facet Satisfaction

    Charles E. Lance;Gary J. Lautenschlager;Christopher E. Sloan;Philip E. Varca

  • Specification of the criterion construct space: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis.

    Charles E. Lance;Mark S. Teachout;Terrance M. Donnelly

  • RATER SOURCE EFFECTS ARE ALIVE AND WELL AFTER ALL

    Brian Hoffman;Charles E. Lance;Bethany Bynum;William A. Gentry

  • Tests of the causal directions of global — Life facet satisfaction relationships

    Charles E. Lance;Alison G. Mallard;Alex C. Michalos

Frequent Co-Authors

Gail M. Williamson
Gail M. Williamson University of Georgia
Robert J. Vandenberg
Robert J. Vandenberg University of Georgia
Brian J. Hoffman
Brian J. Hoffman University of Georgia
James MacKillop
James MacKillop McMaster University
Adam S. Goodie
Adam S. Goodie University of Georgia
David M. DeJoy
David M. DeJoy University of Georgia
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Joshua D. Miller
Joshua D. Miller University of Georgia
W. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell University of Georgia
Dean Tjosvold
Dean Tjosvold Lingnan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding online programs and specialized career opportunities across the USA. Many students consider becoming licensed mental health counselors, a pathway that often requires a master’s degree in counseling or a related field, supervised clinical experience, and passing a national or state exam.

Requirements can vary significantly by location. For example, if you are interested in learning about mental health counselor requirements in Indianapolis, you will discover there are specific state and local guidelines to follow. Similarly, those curious about mental health counselor requirements in Irvine or people seeking to become a mental health counselor in Irving should research the different licensing processes and accredited programs available in those cities.

In Jacksonville, the pathway is unique as well—see more about how to become a mental health counselor in Jacksonville. Exploring these career pathways allows students to align their studies with local requirements and personal interests, paving the way for a fulfilling professional journey in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Charles E. Lance

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles