World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
9152
World Ranking
5967
National Ranking
2612

Enikö A. Kramár publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enikö A. Kramár sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 90 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Enikö A. Kramár D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enikö A. Kramár sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Enikö A. Kramár is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with specific emphasis on Neurology, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work extensively covers topics such as neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, radiation therapy and dosimetry, glioma diagnosis and treatment, anesthesia and neurotoxicity research, and memory and neural mechanisms.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Marcelo A. Wood, Dina P. Matheos, Andrea J. Tenner, Charles L. Limoli, and Celia Da Cunha.

Enikö A. Kramár has published multiple papers in well-known venues. The list of frequent publication venues includes bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's & Dementia, Neuropsychopharmacology, Nature Communications, and Radiotherapy and Oncology.

Recent publications by Enikö A. Kramár cover various aspects of neuroscience and related therapies. These include:

  • Systematic phenotyping and characterization of the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, 2021, Scientific Data
  • Systematic Phenotyping and Characterization of the 3xTg-AD Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Generation of a humanized Aβ expressing mouse demonstrating aspects of Alzheimer's disease-like pathology, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Elucidating the neurological mechanism of the FLASH effect in juvenile mice exposed to hypofractionated radiotherapy, 2022, Neuro-Oncology
  • The sparing effect of FLASH-RT on synaptic plasticity is maintained in mice with standard fractionation, 2023, Radiotherapy and Oncology

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of Late-Onset Cognitive Decline after Early-Life Stress

    Kristen L. Brunson;Enikö Kramár;Bin Lin;Yuncai Chen

  • Systematic phenotyping and characterization of the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Stefania Forner;Shimako Kawauchi;Gabriela Balderrama-Gutierrez;Enikö A. Kramár

  • Replacement of microglia in the aged brain reverses cognitive, synaptic, and neuronal deficits in mice.

    Monica R. P. Elmore;Lindsay A. Hohsfield;Enikö A. Kramár;Lilach Soreq;Lilach Soreq

  • Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Promotes Long-Term Potentiation-Related Cytoskeletal Changes in Adult Hippocampus

    Christopher S. Rex;Ching Yi Lin;Eniko A. Kramár;Lulu Y. Chen

  • Systematic phenotyping and characterization of the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Cytoskeletal Changes Underlie Estrogen's Acute Effects on Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity

    Enikö A Kramár;Lulu Y Chen;Nicholas J Brandon;Christopher S Rex

  • Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Is Suppressed by Interleukin-1β via p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase

    Liqi Tong;G. Aleph Prieto;Enikö A. Kramár;Erica D. Smith

  • Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Rescues Synaptic Plasticity in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Christopher S. Rex;Eniko Kramár;Lulu Y. Chen

  • The neuron-specific chromatin regulatory subunit BAF53b is necessary for synaptic plasticity and memory.

    Annie Vogel-Ciernia;Dina P. Matheos;Ruth M. Barrett;Enikoe A. Kramar

  • Hippocampal Focal Knockout of CBP Affects Specific Histone Modifications, Long-Term Potentiation, and Long-Term Memory

    Ruth M Barrett;Melissa Malvaez;Eniko Kramar;Dina P Matheos

  • Integrin-driven actin polymerization consolidates long-term potentiation

    Enikö A. Kramár;Bin Lin;Christopher S. Rex;Christine M. Gall

  • A novel mechanism for the facilitation of theta-induced long-term potentiation by brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

    Enikö A. Kramár;Bin Lin;Ching Yi Lin;Amy C. Arai

  • Myosin IIb regulates actin dynamics during synaptic plasticity and memory formation.

    Christopher S. Rex;Cristin F. Gavin;Maria D. Rubio;Eniko A. Kramar

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor restores synaptic plasticity in a knock-in mouse model of Huntington's disease.

    Gary Lynch;Eniko A. Kramar;Christopher S. Rex;Yousheng Jia

  • Synaptic evidence for the efficacy of spaced learning

    Enikö A. Kramár;Alex H. Babayan;Cristin F. Gavin;Conor D. Cox

  • Theta Stimulation Polymerizes Actin in Dendritic Spines of Hippocampus

    Bin Lin;Enikö A. Kramár;Xiaoning Bi;Fernando A. Brucher

  • Restoration of Long-Term Potentiation in Middle-Aged Hippocampus After Induction of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

    Christopher S. Rex;Julie C. Lauterborn;Ching Yi Lin;Eniko A. Kramár

  • Contributions of the Brain Angiotensin IV–AT4 Receptor Subtype System to Spatial Learning

    Unknown

  • Epigenetic regulation of the circadian gene Per1 contributes to age-related changes in hippocampal memory

    Janine L. Kwapis;Yasaman Alaghband;Enikö A. Kramár;Alberto J. López

  • Reduced cognition in Syngap1 mutants is caused by isolated damage within developing forebrain excitatory neurons.

    Emin D. Ozkan;Thomas K. Creson;Enikö A. Kramár;Camilo Rojas

  • Physiological Activation of Synaptic Rac>PAK (p-21 Activated Kinase) Signaling Is Defective in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

    Lulu Y. Chen;Christopher S. Rex;Alex H. Babayan;Eniko A. Kramár

  • Long-term potentiation is impaired in middle-aged rats: regional specificity and reversal by adenosine receptor antagonists.

    Christopher S. Rex;Enikö A. Kramár;Laura L. Colgin;Bin Lin

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes long-term potentiation-related cytoskeletal changes in adult hippocampus. - eScholarship

    Christopher S Rex;Ching-Yi Lin;Eniko A Kramár;Lulu Y Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary Lynch
Gary Lynch University of California, Irvine
Christine M. Gall
Christine M. Gall University of California, Irvine
Marcelo A. Wood
Marcelo A. Wood University of California, Irvine
Kim N. Green
Kim N. Green University of California, Irvine
Julie C. Lauterborn
Julie C. Lauterborn University of California, Irvine
Frank M. LaFerla
Frank M. LaFerla University of California, Irvine
Laura Lee Colgin
Laura Lee Colgin The University of Texas at Austin
Andrea J. Tenner
Andrea J. Tenner University of California, Irvine
Gavin Rumbaugh
Gavin Rumbaugh Scripps Research Institute
Tallie Z. Baram
Tallie Z. Baram University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to related fields in psychology, mental health, and social work. Students interested in flexible learning will find a growing number of accredited programs online to help them advance their careers or pivot into new areas.

For those drawn to the study of brain and behavior, an online psychology degree is a cost-effective option, equipping graduates for various entry-level positions and advanced study. If you aspire to clinical or counseling roles, consider specialized paths like the online masters mft route, which prepares you for family therapy licensure in a relatively short timeframe.

Seeking leadership or mental health advocacy positions? Shorter, intensive 1 year msw programs online no bsw offer accessible tracks for those without a bachelor’s in social work, addressing urgent workforce needs. For a clinical psychologist path, research psyd programs designed for online learning with practical training components.

Each pathway provides unique skills and job prospects, broadening possibilities for neuroscience students ready to make a real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing Enikö A. Kramár

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles