World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
7579
World Ranking
4471
National Ranking
491

Johanna J. Heymans publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johanna J. Heymans sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Johanna J. Heymans D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johanna J. Heymans sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johanna J. Heymans is affiliated with the Scottish Association For Marine Science in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with a particular emphasis on global and planetary change, ecology, management, monitoring, policy and law, oceanography, and health-related toxicology.

The scientist's work extensively covers marine and fisheries research, marine bivalve and aquaculture studies, coastal and marine management, coral and marine ecosystems studies, marine and coastal ecosystems, isotope analysis in ecology, and oceanographic and atmospheric processes.

Heymans has published several papers, including:

  • The Ocean Decade: A True Ecosystem Modeling Challenge (2020) in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Refining Fisheries Advice With Stock-Specific Ecosystem Information (2021) in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Effects of Nutrient Management Scenarios on Marine Food Webs: A Pan-European Assessment in Support of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2021) in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Combining ecosystem modeling with serious gaming in support of transboundary maritime spatial planning (2020) in Ecology and Society
  • Retrospective analysis of the influence of environmental drivers on commercial stocks and fishing opportunities in the Irish Sea (2020) in Fisheries Oceanography

Heymans has frequently published in notable venues including:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • ICES Journal of Marine Science
  • Ocean & Coastal Management
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Ecology and Society

Collaborations have been an integral part of Heymans' research output. Frequent co-authors include Jeroen Steenbeek, Jacob W. Bentley, Natalia Serpetti, Marta Coll, and Gert Everaert.

Best Publications

  • Hundred‐year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes

    Villy Christensen;Sylvie Guénette;Johanna J Heymans;Carl J Walters

  • Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management

    Johanna Jacomina Heymans;Marta Coll;Marta Coll;Jason S. Link;Steven Mackinson

  • A Roadmap for Using the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development in Support of Science, Policy, and Action

    Joachim Claudet;Laurent Bopp;William W.L. Cheung;Rodolphe Devillers;Rodolphe Devillers

  • Global Patterns in Ecological Indicators of Marine Food Webs: A Modelling Approach

    Johanna Jacomina Heymans;Marta Coll;Simone Libralato;Lyne Morissette

  • Using indicators for evaluating, comparing, and communicating the ecological status of exploited marine ecosystems. 2. Setting the scene.

    Yunne-Jai Shin;Lynne J. Shannon;Alida Bundy;Marta Coll

  • Changes in the northern Benguela ecosystem over three decades: 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s

    Johanna J Heymans;Lynne J Shannon;Astrid Jarre

  • A risk-based approach to cumulative effect assessments for marine management

    Vanessa Stelzenmüller;Marta Coll;Antonios D. Mazaris;Sylvaine Giakoumi;Sylvaine Giakoumi

  • Trophic level-based indicators to track fishing impacts across marine ecosystems

    Lynne Shannon;Marta Coll;Alida Bundy;Didier Gascuel

  • Ecological indicators to capture the effects of fishing on biodiversity and conservation status of marine ecosystems

    M. Coll;M. Coll;L. J. Shannon;K. M. Kleisner;M. J. Juan-Jorda

  • Can simple be useful and reliable? Using ecological indicators to represent and compare the states of marine ecosystems

    Yunne-Jai Shin;Alida Bundy;Lynne J. Shannon;Monique Simier

  • Impact of ocean warming on sustainable fisheries management informs the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries.

    Natalia Serpetti;Alan Ronan Baudron;Michael Burrows;Benjamin Luke Payne

  • Overlooked impacts and challenges of the new European discard ban

    Francesc Sardà;Marta Coll;Johanna J Heymans;Konstantinos I Stergiou

  • Understanding the structure and functioning of polar pelagic ecosystems to predict the impacts of change.

    Eugene J. Murphy;Rachel D. Cavanagh;Ken F. Drinkwater;Susie M. Grant

  • Which forcing factors fit? Using ecosystem models to investigate the relative influence of fishing and changes in primary productivity on the dynamics of marine ecosystems

    Steven Mackinson;G. Daskalov;Johanna J. Heymans;Sergio Neira

  • Network analysis of the South Florida Everglades graminoid marshes and comparison with nearby cypress ecosystems

    J.J Heymans;R.E Ulanowicz;C Bondavalli

  • Seals, cod and forage fish: A comparative exploration of variations in the theme of stock collapse and ecosystem change in four Northwest Atlantic ecosystems

    Alida Bundy;Johanna J. Heymans;Lyne Morissette;Claude Savenkoff

  • Future scenarios of marine resources and ecosystem conditions in the Eastern Mediterranean under the impacts of fishing, alien species and sea warming.

    X. Corrales;Marta Coll;E. Ofir;Johanna J. Heymans

  • A carbon flow model and network analysis of the northern Benguela upwelling system, Namibia

    J.J Heymans;D Baird

  • Food-web structure of and fishing impacts on the Gulf of Cadiz ecosystem (South-western Spain)

    María Ángeles Torres;Marta Coll;Johanna Jacomina Heymans;Villy Christensen

  • Copernicus Marine Service Ocean State Report, Issue 5

    Karina von Schuckmann;Pierre-Yves Le Traon;Neville Smith;Ananda Pascual

  • Network analysis of the northern Benguela ecosystem by means of netwrk and ecopath

    J.J Heymans;D Baird

Frequent Co-Authors

Marta Coll
Marta Coll Spanish National Research Council
Lynne J. Shannon
Lynne J. Shannon University of Cape Town
Villy Christensen
Villy Christensen University of British Columbia
Elizabeth A. Fulton
Elizabeth A. Fulton Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Alida Bundy
Alida Bundy Bedford Institute of Oceanography
Yunne-Jai Shin
Yunne-Jai Shin Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Jeroen Steenbeek
Jeroen Steenbeek Spanish National Research Council
Steven Mackinson
Steven Mackinson Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
Christopher P. Lynam
Christopher P. Lynam Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
Henn Ojaveer
Henn Ojaveer University of Tartu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in furthering their educational journey beyond Ecology and Evolution studies, exploring online healthcare and nursing degrees can open even more career pathways. Programs such as rn to np bridge programs are designed for registered nurses who want to advance rapidly to a nurse practitioner role. These bridge programs can often be completed online, offering students flexibility and accelerated options to grow their careers.

Non-nurses looking for a fast track into the nursing profession may find msn direct entry programs online particularly beneficial. These unique programs allow motivated students with a bachelor’s degree in another field to transition into nursing and obtain a master’s degree efficiently.

As you compare schools, it's important to consider factors like accreditation. For instance, understanding capella university nursing accreditation can help ensure you select a reputable and recognized program.

Cost is also a major consideration for many students. If budget is a concern, researching the cheapest bsn to msn online options can help you find high-quality programs that fit your financial needs. By understanding these pathways, you can make informed decisions as you transition or expand your career in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Johanna J. Heymans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles