World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 58 1648 1477 782 691 409 13213

James F. Thrasher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James F. Thrasher between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James F. Thrasher published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 20 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2018. 82 of the 520 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2018. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 42 publications 2025: 40 publications
2000 2025

520 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James F. Thrasher: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 6
2007 4
2008 4
2009 6
2010 17
2011 11
2012 20
2013 20
2014 22
2015 31
2016 39
2017 30
2018 48
2019 41
2020 26
2021 45
2022 34
2023 27
2024 42
2025 40
Total 520
Download as CSV

James F. Thrasher publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Thrasher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 404–413 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 409 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30 409
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

James F. Thrasher D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Thrasher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95 58
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

James F. Thrasher is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a substantial emphasis on physiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and applied psychology.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of topics, prominently including smoking behavior and cessation, behavioral health and interventions, obesity, physical activity, and diet. Other notable research interests involve consumer attitudes and food labeling, media influence and health, global public health policies and epidemiology, as well as air quality and health impacts.

Frequent publication venues for James F. Thrasher include:

  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Tobacco Control
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • UNC Libraries
  • Preventive Medicine Reports

The scientist has co-authored extensively with several researchers, including:

  • David Hammond
  • Nancy L. Fleischer
  • Edna Arillo-Santillán
  • Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez
  • Adam O. Goldstein

Among recent publications are the following papers:

  • Identification and evaluation of risk of generalizability biases in pilot versus efficacy/effectiveness trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Tobacco Quit Intentions and Behaviors among Cigar Smokers in the United States in Response to COVID-19, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Social norms as a predictor of smoking uptake among youth: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of prospective cohort studies, 2021, Addiction
  • Trends in e-cigarette brands, devices and the nicotine profile of products used by youth in England, Canada and the USA: 2017-2019, 2021, Tobacco Control
  • Perceptions of Harmfulness of Heated Tobacco Products Compared to Combustible Cigarettes among Adult Smokers in Japan: Findings from the 2018 ITC Japan Survey, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey

    Sarah E. Adkison;Richard J. O'Connor;Maansi Bansal-Travers;Andrew Hyland

  • Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years

    R Borland;N Wilson;G T Fong;D Hammond

  • Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.

    David Hammond;Jessica L Reid;Vicki L Rynard;Geoffrey T Fong;Geoffrey T Fong

  • Tobacco Denormalization and Industry Beliefs Among Smokers from Four Countries

    David Hammond;Geoffrey T. Fong;Mark P. Zanna;James F. Thrasher

  • Examining the relationship of vaping to smoking initiation among US youth and young adults: a reality check

    David T Levy;Kenneth E Warner;K Michael Cummings;David Hammond

  • Awareness, Trial, and Current Use of Electronic Cigarettes in 10 Countries: Findings from the ITC Project

    Shannon Gravely;Geoffrey Fong;K. Cummings;Mi Yan

  • Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities.

    David Hammond;James Thrasher;Jessica L. Reid;Pete Driezen

  • Smokers' reactions to cigarette package warnings with graphic imagery and with only text: A comparison between Mexico and Canada

    James F Thrasher;David Hammond;Geoffrey T Fong;Edna Arillo-Santillán

  • Impact of Tobacco-Related Health Warning Labels across Socioeconomic, Race and Ethnic Groups: Results from a Randomized Web-Based Experiment

    Jennifer Cantrell;Donna M. Vallone;James F. Thrasher;Rebekah H. Nagler

  • Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities.

    James F. Thrasher;Matthew J. Carpenter;Jeannette O. Andrews;Kevin M. Gray

  • Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and “plain” cigarette packaging: Evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States

    James F. Thrasher;Matthew C. Rousu;David Hammond;Ashley Navarro

  • Mediational pathways of the impact of cigarette warning labels on quit attempts.

    Hua-Hie Yong;Ron Borland;James F. Thrasher;Mary E. Thompson

  • Identification and evaluation of risk of generalizability biases in pilot versus efficacy/effectiveness trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Michael W. Beets;R. Glenn Weaver;John P. A. Ioannidis;Marco Geraci

  • Cessation assistance reported by smokers in 15 countries participating in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) policy evaluation surveys

    Ron Borland;Lin Li;Pete Driezen;Nick Wilson

  • Influences of Self-Efficacy, Response Efficacy, and Reactance on Responses to Cigarette Health Warnings: A Longitudinal Study of Adult Smokers in Australia and Canada

    James F. Thrasher;Kamala Swayampakala;Ron Borland;Gera Nagelhout

  • Socioeconomic status and smokers' number of smoking friends: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

    Sara C. Hitchman;Geoffrey T. Fong;Mark P. Zanna;James F. Thrasher

  • Smoke-free policies and the social acceptability of smoking in Uruguay and Mexico: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project

    James F. Thrasher;Marcelo Boado;Ernesto M. Sebrié;Eduardo Bianco

  • Assessing the impact of cigarette package health warning labels: a cross-country comparison in Brazil, Uruguay and Mexico

    James F Thrasher;Victor Villalobos;André Szklo;Geoffrey T Fong;Geoffrey T Fong

  • Behavior-Specific Social Support for Healthy Behaviors Among African American Church Members: Applying Optimal Matching Theory

    James F. Thrasher;Marci Kramish Campbell;Veronica Oates

  • Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US.

    Yoo Jin Cho;James F. Thrasher;Hua-Hie Yong;André Salem Szklo

  • Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content.

    James F. Thrasher;Edna Arillo-Santillán;Victor Villalobos;Rosaura Pérez-Hernández

  • Policy Support, Norms, and Secondhand Smoke Exposure Before and After Implementation of a Comprehensive Smoke-Free Law in Mexico City.

    James F. Thrasher;Rosaura Pérez-Hernández;Kamala Swayampakala;Edna Arillo-Santillán

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey T. Fong
Geoffrey T. Fong University of Waterloo
David Hammond
David Hammond University of Waterloo
Ron Borland
Ron Borland University of Melbourne
K. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings Medical University of South Carolina
Ann McNeill
Ann McNeill University of Adelaide
James D. Sargent
James D. Sargent Dartmouth College
Crawford Moodie
Crawford Moodie University of Stirling
Jeff Niederdeppe
Jeff Niederdeppe Cornell University
Marc C. Willemsen
Marc C. Willemsen Maastricht University
Carla J. Berg
Carla J. Berg George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse and meaningful career paths. Today, students can access accredited and reputable programs entirely online, making higher education more accessible than ever. Programs like the cheapest cswe-accredited online msw programs allow aspiring social workers to earn their degree affordably while meeting professional licensing requirements.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, enrolling in bcba online masters programs can fast-track your entry into in-demand roles in clinical, educational, or private practice settings. Many universities now also offer accelerated msw online options, helping driven students complete their graduate studies in less time and begin their careers sooner.

If you’re eager to start making an impact quickly, consider one of the fastest psychology degree paths available. With flexibility, affordability, and accelerated formats, online education can help you gain relevant skills and launch a rewarding career in the social sciences or humanities.

Best Scientists Citing James F. Thrasher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles