World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
58
Citations
14422
World Ranking
1644
National Ranking
303

Linda Bauld publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Bauld sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 450 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Linda Bauld D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Bauld sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Linda Bauld is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and health professions, with a significant concentration in physiology, general health professions, and public health, environmental and occupational health. Their work also extends into organizational behavior and human resource management as well as speech and hearing.

Their main research topics include:

  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Policy Implementation Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Linda Bauld include:

  • Fiona Dobbie
  • Caitlin Notley
  • Michael Ussher
  • Peter Hájek
  • Kamran Siddiqi

Their published work appears regularly in notable journals such as:

  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Addiction
  • BMJ Open
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Linda Bauld include:

  • "Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy," 2021, BMJ
  • "Protocol for expansion of an existing national monthly survey of smoking behaviour and alcohol use in England to Scotland and Wales: The Smoking and Alcohol Toolkit Study," 2021, Wellcome Open Research
  • "Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial," 2022, Nature Medicine
  • "The Impact of COVID-19 on Smoking Patterns in Pakistan: Findings From a Longitudinal Survey of Smokers," 2020, Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • "Vaping in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review," 2021, Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Linda Bauld has been recognized with several awards, including being named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2019 and a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review

    Rosemary Hiscock;Linda Bauld;Amanda Amos;Jennifer A. Fidler

  • The English smoking treatment services: one‐year outcomes

    Janet Ferguson;Linda Bauld;John Chesterman;Ken Judge

  • Incentives for smoking cessation.

    Unknown

  • E-cigarettes: Prevalence and attitudes in Great Britain.

    Martin Dockrell;Rory Morrison;Linda Bauld;Ann McNeill

  • Evidence review of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018: a report commissioned by Public Health England.

    Ann Denise McNeill;Leonie Sarah Brose;Robert Calder;Linda Bauld

  • Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy.

    Mohammad S Razai;Umar A R Chaudhry;Katja Doerholt;Linda Bauld

  • The effectiveness of NHS smoking cessation services: a systematic review

    Linda Bauld;Kirsten Bell;Lucy McCullough;Lindsay Richardson

  • Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial

    David Tappin;Linda Bauld;David Purves;Kathleen Boyd

  • Short term impact of smoke-free legislation in England: retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction

    Michelle Sims;Roy Maxwell;Linda Bauld;Anna Gilmore

  • Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

    Yen-Fu Chen;Jason Madan;Nicky Welton;Ismail Yahaya

  • Nicotine without smoke: Tobacco harm reduction

    Amanda Amos;Deborah Arnott;Paul Aveyard;Linda Bauld

  • Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker

    Rosemary Hiscock;Linda Bauld;Amanda Amos;Stephen Platt

  • Social inequalities in quitting smoking: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation?

    Rosemary E Hiscock;Ken Judge;Linda Bauld

  • Strong theory, flexible methods: Evaluating complex community-based initiatives

    Ken Judge;Linda Bauld

  • Assessing the impact of smoking cessation services on reducing health inequalities in England: observational study

    Linda Bauld;Kenneth Judge;Stephen Platt

  • Mass media to communicate public health messages in six health topic areas: a systematic review and other reviews of the evidence

    Martine Stead;Kathryn Angus;Tessa Langley;Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi

  • Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers.

    Marcus R. Munafò;Nicole Roberts;Linda Bauld;Ute Leonards

  • Effectiveness of mass media campaigns to reduce alcohol consumption and harm: a systematic review

    Ben Young;Sarah Lewis;Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi;Linda Bauld;Linda Bauld

  • The English smoking treatment services: short-term outcomes

    Ken Judge;Linda Bauld;John Chesterman;Janet Ferguson

  • Young People’s Use of E-Cigarettes across the United Kingdom: Findings from Five Surveys 2015-2017

    Linda Bauld;Anne Marie MacKintosh;Brian Eastwood;Allison Ford;Allison Ford

  • Plain tobacco packaging: A systematic review

    Crawford Moodie;Martine Stead;Linda Bauld;Ann McNeill

  • Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.

    Ann Denise McNeill;Shannon Gravely;Sara Christine Brenda Hitchman;Linda Bauld

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann McNeill
Ann McNeill University of Adelaide
Falko F. Sniehotta
Falko F. Sniehotta Newcastle University
Sarah Lewis
Sarah Lewis University of Nottingham
Crawford Moodie
Crawford Moodie University of Stirling
Rosemary Hiscock
Rosemary Hiscock University of Bath
Martine Stead
Martine Stead University of Stirling
Michael Ussher
Michael Ussher St George's, University of London
Amanda Amos
Amanda Amos University of Edinburgh
Anne Marie MacKintosh
Anne Marie MacKintosh University of Stirling
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the Social Sciences and Humanities opens many rewarding career options in fields like counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Today, students can start these journeys online, gaining flexibility and accessibility without sacrificing quality.

For those interested in becoming licensed counselors, choosing cacrep accredited programs is essential to ensure your degree is recognized by employers and state licensure boards. Couples and families benefit from specialized expertise, and students can pursue this through rigorous online mft programs accredited for marriage and family therapy roles.

Psychology remains a popular major with diverse career outcomes. Affordable and accessible education is now possible with cheap online psychology degree programs—great for students mindful of costs.

Those committed to community health and advocacy may consider an online master's in social work, opening doors to impactful roles in social services. Whichever path you choose, accredited online degrees can lead to meaningful and secure careers in the U.S. and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Bauld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles