World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
129
Citations
70286
World Ranking
2568
National Ranking
1442

Peter C.M. van Zijl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C.M. van Zijl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 488 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter C.M. van Zijl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C.M. van Zijl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 129 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter C.M. van Zijl is affiliated with the Kennedy Krieger Institute in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Additional subfields include Materials Chemistry, Neurology, Biophysics, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their scientific output includes extensive work on advanced imaging techniques and neuroimaging applications. Key topics of research encompass:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Electron Spin Resonance Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Frequent publishing venues for van Zijl's work comprise specialized conferences and high-impact journals, including:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition / Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • NMR in Biomedicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Stroke

Their collaborations involve several recurrent co-authors, evidencing active engagement in multidisciplinary research networks. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Linda Knutsson
  • Nirbhay N. Yadav
  • Xu Li
  • Jiadi Xu
  • Jun Hua

A selection of recent publications illustrates the range and depth of research contributions:

  • Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors, 2022, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • In vivo imaging of phosphocreatine with artificial neural networks, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group, 2024, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • Altered d-glucose in brain parenchyma and cerebrospinal fluid of early Alzheimer's disease detected by dynamic glucose-enhanced MRI, 2020, Science Advances
  • Imaging meningeal inflammation in CNS autoimmunity identifies a therapeutic role for BTK inhibition, 2021, Brain

Best Publications

  • Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging.

    Susumu Mori;Barbara J. Crain;V. P. Chacko;Peter C. M. Van Zijl

  • Fiber tracking: Principles and strategies - A technical review

    Susumu Mori;Peter C. M. van Zijl

  • Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy.

    Setsu Wakana;Hangyi Jiang;Lidia M. Nagae-Poetscher;Peter C. M. van Zijl

  • Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template

    Susumu Mori;Susumu Mori;Kenichi Oishi;Hangyi Jiang;Li Jiang

  • Reproducibility of Quantitative Tractography Methods Applied to Cerebral White Matter

    Setsu Wakana;Arvind Caprihan;Martina M. Panzenboeck;James H. Fallon

  • Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents

    Kimberly G. Noble;Suzanne M. Houston;Natalie H Brito;Hauke Bartsch

  • Tract Probability Maps in Stereotaxic Spaces: Analyses of White Matter Anatomy and Tract-Specific Quantification

    Kegang Hua;Jiangyang Zhang;Setsu Wakana;Hangyi Jiang

  • Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI.

    Jinyuan Zhou;Jinyuan Zhou;Jean Francois Payen;Jean Francois Payen;David A. Wilson;Richard J. Traystman

  • DtiStudio: Resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking

    Hangyi Jiang;Hangyi Jiang;Peter C.M. van Zijl;Peter C.M. van Zijl;Jinsuh Kim;Jinsuh Kim;Godfrey D. Pearlson;Godfrey D. Pearlson

  • Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?

    Peter C M van Zijl;Peter C M van Zijl;Nirbhay N Yadav;Nirbhay N Yadav

  • Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla

    Hanzhang Lu;Hanzhang Lu;Chekesha Clingman;Xavier Golay;Peter C M Van Zijl

  • Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments.

    Mina Kim;Mina Kim;Joseph Gillen;Joseph Gillen;Bennett A. Landman;Jinyuan Zhou;Jinyuan Zhou

  • Imaging cortical association tracts in the human brain using diffusion-tensor-based axonal tracking.

    Susumu Mori;Walter E. Kaufmann;Christos Davatzikos;Bram Stieltjes

  • Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors.

    Jinyuan Zhou;Jinyuan Zhou;Bachchu Lal;David A. Wilson;John Laterra

  • Diffusion tensor imaging and axonal tracking in the human brainstem.

    Bram Stieltjes;Walter E. Kaufmann;Peter C.M. van Zijl;Kim Fredericksen

  • Atlas-based whole brain white matter analysis using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping: application to normal elderly and Alzheimer's disease participants.

    Kenichi Oishi;Andreia Faria;Hangyi Jiang;Hangyi Jiang;Xin Li

  • Human brain white matter atlas: Identification and assignment of common anatomical structures in superficial white matter

    Kenichi Oishi;Karl Zilles;Katrin Amunts;Andreia Faria

  • Quantitative assessment of blood flow, blood volume and blood oxygenation effects in functional magnetic resonance imaging

    P.C.M van Zijl;S.E Eleff;J.A Ulatowski;J.M.E Oja;J.M.E Oja

  • Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides

    Jinyuan Zhou;Jinyuan Zhou;Erik Tryggestad;Zhibo Wen;Zhibo Wen;Bachchu Lal

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging based on changes in vascular space occupancy.

    Hanzhang Lu;Xavier Golay;Xavier Golay;James J. Pekar;Peter C.M. van Zijl;Peter C.M. van Zijl

Frequent Co-Authors

Susumu Mori
Susumu Mori Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Jeff W. M. Bulte
Jeff W. M. Bulte Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Hanzhang Lu
Hanzhang Lu Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
James J. Pekar
James J. Pekar Kennedy Krieger Institute
Peter B. Barker
Peter B. Barker Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Peter A. Calabresi
Peter A. Calabresi Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Manus J. Donahue
Manus J. Donahue Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Christopher A. Ross
Christopher A. Ross Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Martin G. Pomper
Martin G. Pomper Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Daniel S. Reich
Daniel S. Reich National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of Medicine in the USA isn't limited to a traditional MD route. Online degrees offer flexible, accessible options for a career in healthcare. Nursing is one of the most in-demand professions, and finding the cheapest BSN programs online can make entry into nursing more financially feasible for many students.

For those who already have a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, direct entry MSN programs offer a fast-track into advanced nursing positions. Some students look for schools with high acceptance rates to ease the admissions process—see the easiest BSN program to get into for more accessible pathways.

Not interested in clinical roles? Medical administration is a strong alternative. Start a rewarding healthcare career through online learning by considering the best medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid options.

These programs expand access to the healthcare field, allowing flexibility, affordability, and varied career opportunities for aspiring professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C.M. van Zijl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles