World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
37214
World Ranking
8265
National Ranking
243

Ann McNeill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann McNeill sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 579 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ann McNeill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann McNeill sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann McNeill is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Medicine. Their published work spans multiple subfields including Plant Science, Soil Science, Economics and Econometrics, Hematology, and Oncology.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects with a strong emphasis on soil and plant nutrient dynamics. Key topics include:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Cassava research and cyanide
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Ann McNeill has authored papers published in several journals, with notable contributions such as:

  • Combined nitrogen input from legume residues and fertilizer improves early nitrogen supply and uptake by wheat, 2020, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
  • Association of Multiple Anthropometrics of Overweight and Obesity With Incident Heart Failure: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Airflow Obstruction, Lung Function, and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Prognosis of older adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare cohort study, 2023, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
  • Socioeconomic Status, Medicaid Coverage, Clinical Comorbidity, and Rehospitalization or Death After an Incident Heart Failure Hospitalization: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Cohort (1987 to 2004), 2020, UNC Libraries

Their most frequent publication venues include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Soil Research
  • Plant and Soil
  • Journal of Geriatric Oncology
  • Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Ann McNeill collaborates frequently with several co-authors, particularly those who have contributed to multiple works with them, including:

  • Wayne D. Rosamond
  • Therese M. McBeath
  • Pablo A. Cipriotti
  • V. V. S. R. Gupta
  • M. Unkovich

In addition to journal articles, Ann McNeill has contributed to academic books published by the University of Adelaide. One such publication is A Nitrogen Reference Manual for the Southern Cropping Region released in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an update

    Robert West;Ann McNeill;Martin Raw

  • Change in mental health after smoking cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Gemma Taylor;Ann McNeill;Ann McNeill;Alan J Girling;Amanda Farley;Amanda Farley

  • Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey

    Sarah E. Adkison;Richard J. O'Connor;Maansi Bansal-Travers;Andrew Hyland

  • Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

    D Hammond;G T Fong;A McNeill;R Borland

  • Initial symptoms of nicotine dependence in adolescents

    Joseph R. DiFranza;Nancy A. Rigotti;Ann D. McNeill;Judith K. Ockene

  • E-cigarettes: an evidence update. A report commissioned by Public Health England.

    Ann Denise McNeill;Leonie Sarah Brose;Robert Ian Calder;Sara Christine Brenda Hitchman

  • Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals - A guide to effective smoking cessation interventions for the health care system

    Martin Raw;Ann McNEILL;Robert West

  • Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviours among participants in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

    A Hyland;R Borland;Q Li;HH Yong

  • Development of symptoms of tobacco dependence in youths: 30 month follow up data from the DANDY study

    Joseph R. DiFranza;Judith A. Savageau;Nancy A. Rigotti;Kenneth E. Fletcher

  • Nicotine, Carcinogen, and Toxin Exposure in Long-Term E-Cigarette and Nicotine Replacement Therapy Users: A Cross-sectional Study

    Lion Shahab;Maciej L. Goniewicz;Benjamin C. Blount;Jamie Brown

  • Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey

    G T Fong;A Hyland;R Borland;D Hammond

  • Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study.

    David Hammond;Geoffrey T. Fong;Ron Borland;K. Michael Cummings

  • Measuring the loss of autonomy over nicotine use in adolescents: the DANDY (Development and Assessment of Nicotine Dependence in Youths) study.

    Joseph R. DiFranza;Judith A. Savageau;Kenneth E. Fletcher;Judith K. Ockene

  • Symptoms of tobacco dependence after brief intermittent use: the Development and Assessment of Nicotine Dependence in Youth-2 study.

    Joseph R. DiFranza;Judith A. Savageau;Kenneth E. Fletcher;Jennifer L. O'Loughlin

  • Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years

    R Borland;N Wilson;G T Fong;D Hammond

  • E-cigarettes: Prevalence and attitudes in Great Britain.

    Martin Dockrell;Rory Morrison;Linda Bauld;Ann McNeill

  • Evidence review of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018: a report commissioned by Public Health England.

    Ann Denise McNeill;Leonie Sarah Brose;Robert Calder;Linda Bauld

  • How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four-Country survey.

    Ron Borland;Hua-Hie Yong;Nick Wilson;Geoffrey T. Fong;Geoffrey T. Fong

  • Status of implementation of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in Ghana: a qualitative study

    Ellis Owusu-Dabo;Ellis Owusu-Dabo;Ann McNeill;Sarah Lewis;Anna Gilmore

  • Nicotine, Carcinogen, and Toxin Exposure in Long-Term E-Cigarette and Nicotine Replacement Therapy Users

    Lion Shahab;Maciej L. Goniewicz;Benjamin C. Blount;Jamie Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey T. Fong
Geoffrey T. Fong University of Waterloo
Ron Borland
Ron Borland University of Melbourne
Linda Bauld
Linda Bauld University of Edinburgh
Sarah Lewis
Sarah Lewis University of Nottingham
David Hammond
David Hammond University of Waterloo
K. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings Medical University of South Carolina
John Britton
John Britton University of Nottingham
Robert West
Robert West University College London
Marc C. Willemsen
Marc C. Willemsen Maastricht University
James F. Thrasher
James F. Thrasher University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative education options can open new doors in the healthcare field, especially if you are interested in flexible and accelerated pathways. For nurses aiming to advance quickly, enrolling in a dnp online programs offers a path to the highest clinical degree with flexible study options. If you’re just starting your nursing journey, consider a lpn fast track program online, which can help you enter the workforce faster as a Licensed Practical Nurse.

Specialization is also possible online, such as in mental health. Pursuing pmhnp online programs lets you focus on psychiatric care and qualify for in-demand NP roles. Not all healthcare careers require clinical training; you can also impact healthcare through management. Earning a health administration degree online can lead to leadership opportunities and greater job flexibility.

These options highlight how online programs can make medical and healthcare careers more accessible, affordable, and tailored to your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ann McNeill

Trending Scientists