World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7682
World Ranking
8365
National Ranking
503

Frans Coenen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans Coenen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 417 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frans Coenen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans Coenen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frans Coenen is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple domains, with a primary focus on computer science, alongside significant contributions to medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their scholarly work covers a variety of topics, including:

  • Topic Modeling
  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Frans Coenen include:

  • Jionglong Su
  • Yalin Zheng
  • Jia Meng
  • Abouzar Choubineh
  • Jie Chen

Their publications appear in numerous venues, with multiple articles published in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
  • Bioinformatics
  • Applied Intelligence
  • Electronics

Among the recent papers where Frans Coenen has contributed are:

  • Multi-modal generative adversarial networks for traffic event detection in smart cities, 2021, Expert Systems with Applications
  • Zero-Shot Text Classification via Knowledge Graph Embedding for Social Media Data, 2021, IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • Deep-Channel uses deep neural networks to detect single-molecule events from patch-clamp data, 2020, Communications Biology
  • Social media sentiment analysis and opinion mining in public security: Taxonomy, trend analysis, issues and future directions, 2023, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
  • Weakly supervised learning of RNA modifications from low-resolution epitranscriptome data, 2021, Bioinformatics

Frans Coenen has also contributed to the publication of books in the field. One example is a book published by Springer Science+Business Media titled Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management in 2023.

Their research integrates subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Signal Processing

Best Publications

  • Convolutional Neural Networks for Diabetic Retinopathy

    Harry Pratt;Frans Coenen;Deborah M. Broadbent;Simon P. Harding;Simon P. Harding

  • A survey of frequent subgraph mining algorithms

    Chuntao Jiang;Frans Coenen;Michele Zito

  • Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems

    T. J. Bench-Capon;F. P. Coenen

  • Data structure for association rule mining: T-trees and P-trees

    F. Coenen;P. Leng;S. Ahmed

  • Tree Structures for Mining Association Rules

    Frans Coenen;Graham Goulbourne;Paul Leng

  • Text classification using graph mining-based feature extraction

    Chuntao Jiang;Frans Coenen;Robert Sanderson;Michele Zito

  • Driving posture recognition by convolutional neural networks

    Chao Yan;Frans Coenen;Bailing Zhang

  • One-class kernel subspace ensemble for medical image classification

    Yungang Zhang;Yungang Zhang;Bailing Zhang;Frans Coenen;Jimin Xiao

  • A new method for mining Frequent Weighted Itemsets based on WIT-trees

    Bay Vo;Frans Coenen;Bac Le

  • FCNN: Fourier Convolutional Neural Networks

    Harry Pratt;Bryan M. Williams;Frans Coenen;Yalin Zheng

  • Robust chinese traffic sign detection and recognition with deep convolutional neural network

    Rongqiang Qian;Bailing Zhang;Yong Yue;Zhao Wang

  • Breast cancer diagnosis from biopsy images with highly reliable random subspace classifier ensembles

    Yungang Zhang;Bailing Zhang;Frans Coenen;Wenjin Lu

  • Automated "disease/no disease" grading of age-related macular degeneration by an image mining approach.

    Yalin Zheng;Yalin Zheng;Mohd Hanafi Ahmad Hijazi;Mohd Hanafi Ahmad Hijazi;Frans Coenen

  • Maintenance of knowledge-based systems : theory, techniques and tools

    Frans Coenen;T. J. M Bench-Capon

  • Algorithms for Computing Association Rules Using a Partial-Support Tree

    Graham Goulbourne;Frans Coenen;Paul H. Leng

  • Mining frequent itemsets using the N-list and subsume concepts

    Bay Vo;Tuong Le;Frans Coenen;Tzung-Pei Hong

  • Validation and verification of knowledge based systems : theory, tools and practice

    Anca Vermesan;Frans Coenen

  • The effect of threshold values on association rule based classification accuracy

    Frans Coenen;Paul Leng

  • Threshold tuning for improved classification association rule mining

    Frans Coenen;Paul Leng;Lu Zhang

  • Review: data mining: Past, present and future

    Frans Coenen

  • Mining Fuzzy Weighted Association Rules

    D.L. Olson;Yanhong Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon University of Liverpool
Danushka Bollegala
Danushka Bollegala University of Liverpool
Robert M. Christley
Robert M. Christley University of Liverpool
Kaizhu Huang
Kaizhu Huang Duke Kunshan University
Lu Zhang
Lu Zhang Peking University
Alun Preece
Alun Preece Cardiff University
Bay Vo
Bay Vo Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
Zhanfeng Cui
Zhanfeng Cui University of Oxford
Paula R Williamson
Paula R Williamson University of Liverpool
Alan D Radford
Alan D Radford University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to many online academic and career opportunities beyond traditional tech roles. In today’s digital world, online graduate programs make it easier than ever to upskill while balancing work or personal commitments.

For professionals aiming for business leadership, affordable online executive mba programs blend strategic decision-making with tech know-how, preparing students for upper management roles. Meanwhile, those interested in information management may find the mlis online degree—Master of Library and Information Science—an ideal pathway to specialize in digital archives, research, and knowledge organization.

If you’re considering a deeper dive into specialized areas, many online affordable master's programs in fields like cybersecurity, data analytics, and software engineering deliver flexible, high-quality education. For those aspiring to shape organizational strategy at the highest level, an organizational leadership phd builds advanced skills to drive innovation and change.

These related online degrees can boost your credentials and expand your career options, whether you stay in computer science or branch into new industries.

Best Scientists Citing Frans Coenen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles