World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
13087
World Ranking
9288
National Ranking
711

Jane L. Hurst publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane L. Hurst sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 192 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jane L. Hurst D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane L. Hurst sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane L. Hurst is a researcher affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on the field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences with a notable emphasis on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior, and Systematics.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Their recent papers demonstrate contributions to diverse areas within biological sciences. These include:

  • "The pheromone darcin drives a circuit for innate and reinforced behaviours," 2020, published in Nature
  • "The characteristic response of domestic cats to plant iridoids allows them to gain chemical defense against mosquitoes," 2021, published in Science Advances
  • "Harmonizing Labeling and Analytical Strategies to Obtain Protein Turnover Rates in Intact Adult Animals," 2022, published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
  • "Revealing mechanisms of mating plug function under sexual selection," 2020, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Social status and ejaculate composition in the house mouse," 2020, published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Jane L. Hurst frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • iScience
  • Open Biology

Collaborations are an important aspect of their scientific work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Robert J. Beynon
  • Paula Stockley
  • Amanda J. Davidson
  • Reiko Uenoyama
  • Tamako Miyazaki

Overall, Jane L. Hurst's research encompasses a broad range of studies within animal behavior, sensory biology, and ecological interactions, contributing to the understanding of both neuroendocrine mechanisms and evolutionary processes.

Best Publications

  • Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins

    Jane L. Hurst;Caroline E. Payne;Charlotte M. Nevison;Amr D. Marie

  • Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice.

    Jane L. Hurst;Robert J. Beynon

  • Darcin: a male pheromone that stimulates female memory and sexual attraction to an individual male's odour

    Sarah A. Roberts;Deborah M. Simpson;Stuart D. Armstrong;Amanda J. Davidson

  • Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. III. Communication between the sexes

    Jane L. Hurst

  • Proteins in urine scent marks of male house mice extend the longevity of olfactory signals

    Jane L. Hurst;Duncan H.L. Robertson;Ursula Tolladay;Robert J. Beynon

  • The Genetic Basis of Individual-Recognition Signals in the Mouse

    Sarah A. Cheetham;Michael D. Thom;Francine Jury;William E.R. Ollier

  • Urinary proteins and the modulation of chemical scents in mice and rats.

    Robert J Beynon;Jane L Hurst

  • The Genetic Basis of Inbreeding Avoidance in House Mice

    Amy L. Sherborne;Michael D. Thom;Steve Paterson;Francine Jury

  • Multiple roles of major urinary proteins in the house mouse, Mus domesticus.

    Robert Beynon;J L Hurst

  • Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates

    Tracey J Rich;Jane L Hurst

  • Pheromonal Induction of Spatial Learning in Mice

    Sarah A. Roberts;Amanda J. Davidson;Lynn McLean;Robert J. Beynon

  • Female recognition and assessment of males through scent.

    Jane L. Hurst

  • The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates

    Tracey J. Rich;Jane L. Hurst

  • Unravelling the chemical basis of competitive scent marking in house mice.

    R.E. Humphries;D.H.L. Robertson;R.J. Beynon;J.L. Hurst

  • Limited variation in the major urinary proteins of laboratory mice.

    Sarah A. Cheetham;Abigail L. Smith;Stuart D. Armstrong;Robert J. Beynon

  • Positional proteomics: selective recovery and analysis of N-terminal proteolytic peptides

    Lucy McDonald;Duncan H L Robertson;Jane L Hurst;Robert J Beynon

  • The functions of urine marking in a free-living population of house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty

    Jane L. Hurst

  • Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse Report of the Rodent Refinement Working Party

    M. Jennings;G. R. Batchelor;P. F. Brain;A. Dick

  • The priming effects of urine substrate marks on interactions between male house mice, Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz & Schwarz

    Jane L. Hurst

  • Behavioural variation in wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty: A quantitative assessment of female social organization

    Jane L. Hurst

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Beynon
Robert J. Beynon University of Liverpool
Paula Stockley
Paula Stockley University of Liverpool
Christopher J. Barnard
Christopher J. Barnard University of Nottingham
Simon J. Gaskell
Simon J. Gaskell Plymouth University
Francis Gilbert
Francis Gilbert University of Nottingham
Simon J. Hubbard
Simon J. Hubbard Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Steve Paterson
Steve Paterson University of Liverpool
Lu-Yun Lian
Lu-Yun Lian University of Liverpool
Malcolm J. Bennett
Malcolm J. Bennett University of Nottingham
Peter K. McGregor
Peter K. McGregor Cornwall College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jane L. Hurst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles