World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephan Krähenbühl

Stephan Krähenbühl

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
21729
World Ranking
16261
National Ranking
243

Stephan Krähenbühl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Krähenbühl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 433 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephan Krähenbühl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Krähenbühl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephan Krähenbühl is a researcher affiliated with the University of Basel in Switzerland. Their work primarily spans the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on molecular biology and pharmacology as key subfields.

The research topics addressed by Krähenbühl include pharmacogenetics and drug metabolism, drug transport and resistance mechanisms, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer. Additional areas of study involve lipoproteins and cardiovascular health, adipose tissue and metabolism, chronic myeloid leukemia treatments, as well as genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Krähenbühl are Jamal Bouitbir, Urs Duthaler, Miljenko V. Panajatovic, Gerda M. Sanvee, and Noëmi Johanna Roos.

Significant publication venues for Krähenbühl include the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Biochemical Pharmacology, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, The AAPS Journal, and Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

Among recent papers are:

  • "mTORC2 is an important target for simvastatin-associated toxicity in C2C12 cells and mouse skeletal muscle - Roles of Rap1 geranylgeranylation and mitochondrial dysfunction," 2021, Biochemical Pharmacology
  • "Valproic acid affects fatty acid and triglyceride metabolism in HepaRG cells exposed to fatty acids by different mechanisms," 2020, Biochemical Pharmacology
  • "The Risk of Muscular Events Among New Users of Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Statins: an Observational Cohort Study," 2021, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • "Mitochondrial Toxicity Associated with Imatinib and Sorafenib in Isolated Rat Heart Fibers and the Cardiomyoblast H9c2 Cell Line," 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "The uricosuric benzbromarone disturbs the mitochondrial redox homeostasis and activates the NRF2 signaling pathway in HepG2 cells," 2020, Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Best Publications

  • Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized trials

    Christoph Stettler;Sabin Allemann;Peter Jüni;Peter Jüni;Carole A. Cull

  • Drug-related problems in hospitals: a review of the recent literature.

    Anita Krähenbühl-Melcher;Raymond Schlienger;Markus Lampert;Manuel Haschke

  • Long-term metformin use is associated with decreased risk of breast cancer.

    Michael Bodmer;Christian Meier;Stephan Krähenbühl;Susan S. Jick

  • Metformin, sulfonylureas, or other antidiabetes drugs and the risk of lactic acidosis or hypoglycemia: a nested case-control analysis.

    Michael Bodmer;Christian Meier;Stephan Krähenbühl;Susan S. Jick

  • Fulminant liver failure in association with the emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus

    Hellmut Mahler;Aurelio Pasi;John M. Kramer;Petra Schulte

  • Interaction between grapefruit juice and midazolam in humans

    Hugo H.T. Kupferschmidt;Huy Riem Ha;Walter H. Ziegler;Peter J. Meier

  • The human brain endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3 as a human blood-brain barrier model for drug transport studies.

    Birk Poller;Heike Gutmann;Stephan Krahenbuhl;Babette Weksler

  • Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in healthy human subjects.

    Manuel Haschke;Manuel Haschke;Manfred Schuster;Marko Poglitsch;Hans Loibner

  • Toxicity of statins on rat skeletal muscle mitochondria

    Priska Kaufmann;Michael Török;Anja Zahno;Katri Waldhauser

  • Toxicity of bile acids on the electron transport chain of isolated rat liver mitochondria

    Stephan Krähenbühl;Christine Talos;Sven Fischer;Jürg Reichen;Jürg Reichen

  • Grapefruit juice enhances the bioavailability of the HIV protease inhibitor saquinavir in man

    Hugo H. T. Kupferschmidt;Karin E. Fattinger;Huy Riem Ha;Ferenc Follath

  • Dose Adjustment in Patients with Liver Disease

    Fabiola Delcò;Lydia Tchambaz;Raymond Schlienger;Jürgen Drewe

  • Decreased activities of ubiquinol:ferricytochrome c oxidoreductase (complex III) and ferrocytochrome c:oxygen oxidoreductase (complex IV) in liver mitochondria from rats with hydroxycobalamin[c-lactam]-induced methylmalonic aciduria.

    Stephan Krahenbuhl;Mei Chang;Eric P. Brass;Charles L. Hoppel

  • Mechanisms of benzarone and benzbromarone-induced hepatic toxicity.

    Priska Kaufmann;Michael Török;Anya Hänni;Paul Roberts

  • Tumor targeting using liposomal antineoplastic drugs.

    Jörg Huwyler;Jürgen Drewe;Stephan Krähenbühl

  • Regulation of BCRP (ABCG2) and P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) by cytokines in a model of the human blood-brain barrier

    Birk Poller;Jürgen Drewe;Stephan Krähenbühl;Jörg Huwyler

  • Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    U. Giger;M. Ouaissi;S.-F. H. Schmitz;S. Krähenbühl

  • Development and evaluation of a spectrophotometric assay for complex III in isolated mitochondria, tissues and fibroblasts from rats and humans

    Stephan Krähenbühl;Christine Talos;Ulrich Wiesmann;Charles L. Hoppel

  • Statin use and risk of gallstone disease followed by cholecystectomy.

    Michael Bodmer;Yolanda B. Brauchli;Stephan Krähenbühl;Susan S. Jick

  • Reduced antioxidative capacity in liver mitochondria from bile duct ligated rats

    Stephan Krähenbühl;Christine Talos;Bernhard H. Lauterburg;Jürg Reichen

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph R. Meier
Christoph R. Meier University Hospital of Basel
Luigi Terracciano
Luigi Terracciano University Hospital of Basel
Arthur Zimmermann
Arthur Zimmermann University of Bern
Peter C. Hauser
Peter C. Hauser University of Basel
Bruno Stieger
Bruno Stieger University of Zurich
Susan S. Jick
Susan S. Jick Boston University
Werner J. Pichler
Werner J. Pichler University Hospital of Bern
Markus R. Wenk
Markus R. Wenk Hamad bin Khalifa University
Bruno Hagenbuch
Bruno Hagenbuch University of Kansas
Charles L. Hoppel
Charles L. Hoppel Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA isn’t limited to the traditional path. Many students and professionals are now pursuing flexible, career-focused online degrees to advance or change careers in healthcare.

For those interested in healthcare management, consider cahme-accredited online Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) programs, which set a high standard for quality. Nursing professionals looking to enhance their credentials quickly might explore online rn-bsn programs without clinicals, allowing working RNs to earn a bachelor’s degree with greater flexibility.

If you are interested in reaching the highest level of clinical practice, dnp online programs can deliver rigorous training in a convenient format, often with accelerated options. For those seeking less intensive routes, feedback on the easiest dnp program reddit threads can help you compare different programs based on actual student experiences.

With so many pathways available online, students can find a route that matches their schedule, learning style, and career goals—without sacrificing educational quality.

Best Scientists Citing Stephan Krähenbühl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles