World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
92590
World Ranking
5449
National Ranking
2482

Kristina Toutanova publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristina Toutanova sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 121 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kristina Toutanova D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristina Toutanova sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kristina Toutanova is a researcher affiliated with Google in the United States. Their primary research activity is situated within the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Molecular Biology. They have contributed to interdisciplinary areas including Information Systems and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their research topics encompass a range of subjects including Natural Language Processing Techniques, Topic Modeling, Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Machine Learning and Algorithms, Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques, and Speech Recognition and Synthesis.

Among the recent publications authored or co-authored by Kristina Toutanova are:

  • EMBI, 2024, published by Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrieval, 2021, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrieval, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Pix2Struct: Screenshot Parsing as Pretraining for Visual Language Understanding, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Revisiting the Primacy of English in Zero-shot Cross-lingual Transfer, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Kristina Toutanova has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors in their work. These include:

  • Kenton Lee
  • Peter Shaw
  • Ming-Wei Chang
  • Panupong Pasupat
  • Jacob Eisenstein

Their publications are predominantly found in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Best Publications

  • BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

    Jacob Devlin;Ming-Wei Chang;Kenton Lee;Kristina N. Toutanova

  • Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network

    Kristina Toutanova;Dan Klein;Christopher D. Manning;Yoram Singer

  • Natural Questions: A Benchmark for Question Answering Research

    Tom Kwiatkowski;Jennimaria Palomaki;Olivia Redfield;Michael Collins

  • Observed versus latent features for knowledge base and text inference

    Kristina Toutanova;Danqi Chen

  • Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answering

    Kenton Lee;Ming-Wei Chang;Kristina N. Toutanova

  • Representing Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases

    Kristina Toutanova;Danqi Chen;Patrick Pantel;Hoifung Poon

  • BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions

    Christopher Clark;Kenton Lee;Ming-Wei Chang;Tom Kwiatkowski

  • Cross-Sentence N-ary Relation Extraction with Graph LSTMs

    Nanyun Peng;Hoifung Poon;Chris Quirk;Kristina Toutanova

  • Well-Read Students Learn Better: On the Importance of Pre-training Compact Models

    Iulia Turc;Ming-Wei Chang;Kenton Lee;Kristina Toutanova

  • Zero-shot Entity Linking by Reading Entity Descriptions

    Lajanugen Logeswaran;Ming-Wei Chang;Kenton Lee;Kristina N. Toutanova

  • Pronunciation Modeling for Improved Spelling Correction

    Kristina Toutanova;Robert Moore

  • Learning Discriminative Projections for Text Similarity Measures

    Wen-tau Yih;Kristina Toutanova;John C. Platt;Christopher Meek

  • Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrieval

    Yi Luan;Jacob Eisenstein;Kristina Toutanova;Michael Collins

  • Extracting Parallel Sentences from Comparable Corpora using Document Level Alignment

    Jason R. Smith;Chris Quirk;Kristina Toutanova

  • Joint Learning Improves Semantic Role Labeling

    Kristina Toutanova;Aria Haghighi;Christopher Manning

  • Semi-supervised part-of-speech tagging

    Kristina Nikolova Toutanova;Mark Edward Johnson

  • LinGO Redwoods: A Rich and Dynamic Treebank for HPSG

    Stephan Oepen;Dan Flickinger;Kristina Toutanova;Christopher D. Manning

  • A global joint model for semantic role labeling

    Kristina Toutanova;Kristina Toutanova;Kristina Toutanova;Aria Haghighi;Aria Haghighi;Aria Haghighi;Christopher D. Manning;Christopher D. Manning;Christopher D. Manning

  • Unsupervised Morphological Segmentation with Log-Linear Models

    Hoifung Poon;Colin Cherry;Kristina Toutanova

  • Well-Read Students Learn Better: The Impact of Student Initialization on Knowledge Distillation

    Iulia Turc;Ming-Wei Chang;Kenton Lee;Kristina Toutanova

  • Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

    Kristina Toutanova;Hua Wu

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher D. Manning
Christopher D. Manning Stanford University
Kenton Lee
Kenton Lee Google (United States)
Ming-Wei Chang
Ming-Wei Chang Google (United States)
Chris Quirk
Chris Quirk Microsoft (United States)
Hoifung Poon
Hoifung Poon Microsoft (United States)
Wen-tau Yih
Wen-tau Yih Facebook (United States)
Jianfeng Gao
Jianfeng Gao Microsoft (United States)
Dan Flickinger
Dan Flickinger Stanford University
Stephan Oepen
Stephan Oepen University of Oslo
Michael Collins
Michael Collins Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options is a smart move for anyone considering a future in computer science or related fields. Many students are searching for affordable paths to advanced qualifications—especially those balancing work, family, or other responsibilities. If continuing your education is your goal, consider programs such as affordable phd programs and specialized tracks like the cheapest edd, which provide flexible options without the hefty price tag.

Not everyone wants to jump into a lengthy degree program. Some students choose associates degrees online, which are designed for speed and skill development. These shorter options can be ideal for entering the workforce quickly or for those seeking a career change.

Additionally, computer science concepts pair well with business skills. Exploring business degree opportunities online can position you for leadership or entrepreneurial roles within the tech industry.

As you plan your educational journey, compare program lengths, costs, and outcomes to find the best fit for your goals. Online learning offers flexibility and affordability—key advantages for today’s learners.

Best Scientists Citing Kristina Toutanova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles