World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
90
Citations
33374
World Ranking
608
National Ranking
326

Graham Neubig publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Neubig sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 561 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Graham Neubig D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Neubig sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Graham Neubig is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with specific work in various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Signal Processing, and Computer Networks and Communications.

Their main areas of study encompass several topics such as:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Speech and dialogue systems

Neubig has contributed to numerous publications, with a significant number appearing in well-known venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2022, ACM Computing Surveys
  • Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalization, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Frank F. Xu
  • Antonios Anastasopoulos
  • Pengfei Liu
  • Shruti Rijhwani
  • Uri Alon

Best Publications

  • Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing.

    Pengfei Liu;Weizhe Yuan;Jinlan Fu;Zhengbao Jiang

  • A systematic evaluation of large language models of code

    Unknown

  • How Can We Know What Language Models Know

    Zhengbao Jiang;Frank F. Xu;Jun Araki;Graham Neubig

  • A Syntactic Neural Model for General-Purpose Code Generation

    Pengcheng Yin;Graham Neubig

  • DyNet: The Dynamic Neural Network Toolkit

    Graham Neubig;Chris Dyer;Yoav Goldberg;Austin Matthews

  • Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One

    Paul Michel;Omer Levy;Graham Neubig

  • XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalisation

    Junjie Hu;Sebastian Ruder;Aditya Siddhant;Graham Neubig

  • TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Data

    Pengcheng Yin;Graham Neubig;Wen-tau Yih;Sebastian Riedel

  • When and Why Are Pre-Trained Word Embeddings Useful for Neural Machine Translation?

    Ye Qi;Devendra Singh Sachan;Matthieu Felix;Sarguna Janani Padmanabhan

  • Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inference

    Aakanksha Naik;Abhilasha Ravichander;Norman M. Sadeh;Carolyn Penstein Rosé

  • PAL: Program-aided Language Models

    Unknown

  • BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation

    Weizhe Yuan;Graham Neubig;Pengfei Liu

  • Pointwise Prediction for Robust, Adaptable Japanese Morphological Analysis

    Graham Neubig;Yosuke Nakata;Shinsuke Mori

  • Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translation

    Emmanouil Antonios Platanios;Otilia Stretcu;Graham Neubig;Barnabás Póczos

  • XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalization

    Junjie Hu;Sebastian Ruder;Aditya Siddhant;Graham Neubig

  • Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pretrained Models

    Keita Kurita;Paul Michel;Graham Neubig

  • Learning to Generate Pseudo-Code from Source Code Using Statistical Machine Translation (T)

    Yusuke Oda;Hiroyuki Fudaba;Graham Neubig;Hideaki Hata

  • Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning

    Junxian He;Chunting Zhou;Xuezhe Ma;Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick

  • Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learning

    Qizhe Xie;Zihang Dai;Yulun Du;Eduard H. Hovy

  • Learning to mine aligned code and natural language pairs from stack overflow

    Pengcheng Yin;Bowen Deng;Edgar Chen;Bogdan Vasilescu

  • MasakhaNER: Named Entity Recognition for African Languages

    David Ifeoluwa Adelani;Jade Z. Abbott;Graham Neubig;Daniel D'souza

  • GSum: A General Framework for Guided Neural Abstractive Summarization

    Zi-Yi Dou;Pengfei Liu;Hiroaki Hayashi;Zhengbao Jiang

  • Word Alignment by Fine-tuning Embeddings on Parallel Corpora.

    Zi-Yi Dou;Graham Neubig

  • How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answering

    Zhengbao Jiang;Jun Araki;Haibo Ding;Graham Neubig

  • How Can We Know When Language Models Know

    Zhengbao Jiang;Jun Araki;Haibo Ding;Graham Neubig

Frequent Co-Authors

Satoshi Nakamura
Satoshi Nakamura Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Sakriani Sakti
Sakriani Sakti Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Tomoki Toda
Tomoki Toda Nagoya University
Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick
Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick University of California, San Diego
Jaime G. Carbonell
Jaime G. Carbonell Carnegie Mellon University
Alex Waibel
Alex Waibel Carnegie Mellon University
Yiming Yang
Yiming Yang Carnegie Mellon University
Chris Dyer
Chris Dyer Google (United States)
Eduard Hovy
Eduard Hovy Carnegie Mellon University
Eiichiro Sumita
Eiichiro Sumita National Institute of Information and Communications Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s important to consider related online degrees and career pathways to enhance your prospects. There is increasing demand across tech and business fields, making it worthwhile to look at the top degrees in demand for the future. These degrees often align closely with rapidly evolving careers in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and data science.

For those seeking to advance their qualifications with manageable coursework, consider enrolling in easy masters programs that offer flexible schedules and practical learning experiences. If affordability is a primary concern, there are also several affordable phd programs available online from accredited U.S. institutions.

Alternatively, if you are interested in educational leadership or administration, the fastest online edd programs can help you earn advanced credentials on an accelerated timeline. Exploring these diverse online options can significantly broaden your career horizons in the tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Graham Neubig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles