World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
96
Citations
36921
World Ranking
438
National Ranking
243

Alex Waibel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex Waibel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 743 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alex Waibel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex Waibel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to neural network based speech recognition and translation and multimodal interfaces

Overview

Alex Waibel is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and has a strong research profile within computer science, focusing on artificial intelligence, computer vision, and signal processing. Their work spans multiple subfields, including natural language processing techniques, speech and dialogue systems, multimodal machine learning applications, and human pose and action recognition.

Their recent papers include:

  • Incremental learning of humanoid robot behavior from natural interaction and large language models, 2024, Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • Deep Episodic Memory for Verbalization of Robot Experience, 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Where did I leave my keys? - Episodic-Memory-Based Question Answering on Egocentric Videos, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
  • Low Latency ASR for Simultaneous Speech Translation, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Active Learning for Massively Parallel Translation of Constrained Text into Low Resource Languages, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Leonard Bärmann
  • Stefan Constantin
  • Fabian Peller-Konrad
  • Jan Niehues
  • Tamim Asfour

Alex Waibel has published extensively in prominent venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), with 14 publications, as well as in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Their research covers the following topics:

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition

Waibel's scientific contributions and work in neural network-based speech recognition, translation, and multimodal interfaces earned recognition including the IEEE Fellow award in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks

    Alexander Waibel;Toshiyuki Hanazawa;Geoffrey Hinton;Kiyohiro Shikano

  • A real-time face tracker

    Jie Yang;A. Waibel

  • A time-delay neural network architecture for isolated word recognition

    Kevin J. Lang;Alex H. Waibel;Geoffrey E. Hinton

  • Recognizing emotion in speech

    F. Dellaert;T. Polzin;A. Waibel

  • Skin-Color Modeling and Adaptation

    Jie Yang;Weier Lu;Alex Waibel

  • Modular construction of time-delay neural networks for speech recognition

    Alex Waibel

  • Language-independent and language-adaptive acoustic modeling for speech recognition

    Tanja Schultz;Tanja Schultz;Alex Waibel;Alex Waibel

  • Readings in speech recognition

    Alex Waibel;Kai-Fu Lee

  • Automatic detection and recognition of signs from natural scenes

    Xilin Chen;Jie Yang;Jing Zhang;A. Waibel

  • Locating and correcting erroneously recognized portions of utterances by rescoring based on two n-best lists

    Alex H. Waibel;Arthur E. McNair

  • Toward Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with Universal Encoder and Decoder

    Thanh-Le Ha;Jan Niehues;Alexander H. Waibel

  • Method and apparatus for correcting and repairing machine-transcribed input using independent or cross-modal secondary input

    Alexander Waibel;Bernhard Suhm;Arthur McNair

  • Smart Sight: a tourist assistant system

    Jie Yang;Weiyi Yang;M. Denecke;A. Waibel

  • Online handwriting recognition: the NPen++ recognizer

    S. Jaeger;S. Manke;J. Reichert;A. Waibel

  • Extracting deep bottleneck features using stacked auto-encoders

    Jonas Gehring;Yajie Miao;Florian Metze;Alex Waibel

  • System and methods for maintaining speech-to-speech translation in the field

    Alexander Waibel;Ian R. Lane

  • A novel objective function for improved phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks

    J.B. Hampshire;A.H. Waibel

  • Enhanced speech-to-speech translation system and methods for adding a new word

    Alexander Waibel;Ian R. Lane

  • Multimodal error correction for speech user interfaces

    Bernhard Suhm;Brad Myers;Alex Waibel

  • Natural human-robot interaction using speech, head pose and gestures

    R. Stiefelhagen;C. Fugen;R. Gieselmann;H. Holzapfel

  • Enhanced speech-to-speech translation system and methods

    Alexander Waibel;Ian R. Lane

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Niehues
Jan Niehues Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Tanja Schultz
Tanja Schultz University of Bremen
Stephan Vogel
Stephan Vogel University of Graz
Jie Yang
Jie Yang Carnegie Mellon University
Florian Metze
Florian Metze Carnegie Mellon University
Alon Lavie
Alon Lavie Carnegie Mellon University
Rainer Stiefelhagen
Rainer Stiefelhagen Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Lori Levin
Lori Levin Carnegie Mellon University
Graham Neubig
Graham Neubig Carnegie Mellon University
Hagen Soltau
Hagen Soltau Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and potential career paths. Many students are attracted to affordable and flexible programs that can be completed remotely. For students looking to minimize costs, the cheapest online college bachelor degree programs are a smart place to start.

Interested in a technical or engineering-related career? Accredited online engineering degrees allow you to specialize in fields such as software, electrical, or mechanical engineering—often on your own schedule.

For those considering leadership or management roles, pursuing an online executive mba can help bridge the gap between technical knowledge and business acumen. This pathway is ideal for professionals aiming to lead tech teams or startups.

Alternatively, careers in information science or data management may appeal to you. There are now most affordable online mlis programs that offer advanced training in information organization, data curation, and library technology.

Best Scientists Citing Alex Waibel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles