World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 31 13674 13260 660 645 198 4030

Jan Niehues publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Niehues between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Niehues published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2024. 48 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2024. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 22 publications
2006 2025

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Niehues: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 4
2009 3
2010 2
2011 7
2012 7
2013 10
2014 10
2015 11
2016 12
2017 16
2018 23
2019 13
2020 11
2021 7
2022 17
2023 16
2024 26
2025 22
Total 219
Download as CSV

Jan Niehues publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Niehues sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 198 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 198
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Niehues D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Niehues sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879 31
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Niehues is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany, focusing on research predominantly in the field of computer science with a particular emphasis on artificial intelligence. Their scholarly output spans over 110 publications within this main domain.

The research subfields where Jan Niehues has made contributions include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Signal Processing
  • General Health Professions
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Key topics explored in their work cover:

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Speech and Audio Processing

Jan Niehues has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, among them:

  • Danni Liu
  • Tu Anh Dinh
  • Alexander Waibel
  • Sai Koneru
  • Ngoc-Quan Pham

Their recent notable papers include:

  • "Incremental learning of humanoid robot behavior from natural interaction and large language models", 2024, Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • "Joint modelling of audio-visual cues using attention mechanisms for emotion recognition", 2022, Multimedia Tools and Applications
  • "Adaptive multilingual speech recognition with pretrained models", 2022, Interspeech 2022
  • "Improving Zero-Shot Translation by Disentangling Positional Information", 2021, Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • "Low Latency ASR for Simultaneous Speech Translation", 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The venues where Jan Niehues has frequently published comprise:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • Multimedia Tools and Applications

Best Publications

  • Toward Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with Universal Encoder and Decoder

    Thanh-Le Ha;Jan Niehues;Alexander H. Waibel

  • Report on the 11th IWSLT Evaluation Campaign, IWSLT 2014

    Mauro Cettolo;J. Niehues;S. Stüker;Luisa Bentivogli

  • Very Deep Self-Attention Networks for End-to-End Speech Recognition.

    Ngoc-Quan Pham;Thai-Son Nguyen;Jan Niehues;Markus Müller

  • The IWSLT 2015 Evaluation Campaign

    Mauro Cettolo;Jan Niehues;Sebastian Stüker;Luisa Bentivogli

  • Report on the 11th IWSLT evaluation campaign.

    Mauro Cettolo;Jan Niehues;Sebastian Stüker;Luisa Bentivogli

  • Findings of the IWSLT 2022 Evaluation Campaign

    Unknown

  • Self-Attentional Acoustic Models

    Matthias Sperber;Jan Niehues;Graham Neubig;Sebastian Stüker

  • Exploiting Linguistic Resources for Neural Machine Translation Using Multi-task Learning

    Jan Niehues;Eunah Cho

  • Overview of the IWSLT 2017 Evaluation Campaign

    Mauro Cettolo;Marcello Federico;Luisa Bentivogli;Niehues Jan

  • FINDINGS OF THE IWSLT 2020 EVALUATION CAMPAIGN

    Ebrahim Ansari;Amittai Axelrod;Nguyen Bach;Ondrej Bojar

  • Attention-Passing Models for Robust and Data-Efficient End-to-End Speech Translation

    Matthias Sperber;Graham Neubig;Jan Niehues;Alex Waibel;Alex Waibel

  • The IWSLT 2018 Evaluation Campaign

    Niehues Jan;Roldano Cattoni;Stüker Sebastian;Mauro Cettolo

  • Report on the 10th IWSLT evaluation campaign.

    Mauro Cettolo;Jan Niehues;Sebastian Stüker;Luisa Bentivogli

  • The IWSLT 2019 Evaluation Campaign

    J. Niehues;R. Cattoni;S. Stüker;M. Negri

  • Improving Sequence-To-Sequence Speech Recognition Training with On-The-Fly Data Augmentation

    Thai-Son Nguyen;Sebastian Stuker;Jan Niehues;Alex Waibel

  • Pre-Translation for Neural Machine Translation.

    Jan Niehues;Eunah Cho;Thanh-Le Ha;Alex Waibel

  • A POS-Based Model for Long-Range Reorderings in SMT

    Jan Niehues;Muntsin Kolss

  • Wider Context by Using Bilingual Language Models in Machine Translation

    Jan Niehues;Teresa Herrmann;Stephan Vogel;Alex Waibel

  • FINDINGS OF THE IWSLT 2023 EVALUATION CAMPAIGN

    Unknown

  • Neural Lattice-to-Sequence Models for Uncertain Inputs

    Matthias Sperber;Graham Neubig;Jan Niehues;Alex Waibel

  • Very Deep Self-Attention Networks for End-to-End Speech Recognition

    Ngoc-Quan Pham;Thai-Son Nguyen;Jan Niehues;Markus Müller

  • Discriminative Word Alignment via Alignment Matrix Modeling

    Jan Niehues;Stephan Vogel

  • Segmentation and punctuation prediction in speech language translation using a monolingual translation system.

    Eunah Cho;Jan Niehues;Alex Waibel

  • FINDINGS OF THE IWSLT 2021 EVALUATION CAMPAIGN

    Antonios Anastasopoulos;Ondrej Bojar;Jacob Bremerman;Roldano Cattoni

  • Low-latency neural speech translation

    Jan Niehues;Ngoc-Quan Pham;Thanh-Le Ha;Matthias Sperber

  • Pre-Translation for Neural Machine Translation

    Jan Niehues;Eunah Cho;Thanh-Le Ha;Alex Waibel

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Waibel
Alex Waibel Carnegie Mellon University
Marcello Federico
Marcello Federico Amazon (United States)
Graham Neubig
Graham Neubig Carnegie Mellon University
Hermann Ney
Hermann Ney RWTH Aachen University
Mauro Cettolo
Mauro Cettolo Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Luisa Bentivogli
Luisa Bentivogli Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Stephan Vogel
Stephan Vogel University of Graz
Marco Turchi
Marco Turchi Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Ondrej Bojar
Ondrej Bojar Charles University
Lucia Specia
Lucia Specia Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in fields connected to Computer Science? Today's students have more flexible ways to get ahead—many top programs offer online degrees and certifications that open doors to growing careers.

For example, if you’re curious about physics and want flexibility, you may wonder, can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—there are affordable online options that let you study at your own pace.

Those drawn to big data may benefit from following a data science learning path, where online degrees and certificates help you build vital analytics skills.

If engineering excites you, explore electrical engineering degree online admissions information to compare remote study programs and requirements.

Looking for faster entry into the workforce? Consider easy licenses and certifications to get, which can boost your job prospects and earning potential in less time.

Choosing the right online degree or certification can give you the foundation you need for a successful tech career—on your own schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Niehues

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles