World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
16573
World Ranking
9941
National Ranking
20

Ondrej Bojar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ondrej Bojar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 205 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ondrej Bojar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ondrej Bojar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ondrej Bojar is a researcher primarily affiliated with Charles University in Czech Republic. Their academic work centers largely on computer science, with a significant focus on artificial intelligence and its applications. The researcher has contributed to various subfields, including computer vision and pattern recognition, language and linguistics, signal processing, and information systems.

Their research topics cover a broad range of areas such as natural language processing techniques, topic modeling, speech recognition and synthesis, speech and dialogue systems, multimodal machine learning applications, text readability and simplification, and translation studies and practices.

Boasting a substantial number of publications, Ondrej Bojar's research has appeared in diverse venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Natural language processing.
  • Nature Communications

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ondrej Bojar illustrate the scope and impact of their contributions:

  • Transforming machine translation: a deep learning system reaches news translation quality comparable to human professionals, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Sequence Length is a Domain: Length-based Overfitting in Transformer Models, 2021, Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Announcing CzEng 2.0 Parallel Corpus with over 2 Gigawords, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Neural Machine Translation Quality and Post-Editing Performance, 2021, Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Turning Whisper into Real-Time Transcription System, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Ondrej Bojar include:

  • Peter Polák
  • Martin Popel
  • Dominik Macháček
  • Vilém Zouhar
  • Sunit Bhattacharya

Ondrej Bojar has a significant presence in the artificial intelligence research community with specialization in natural language processing and machine translation. Their ongoing work contributes to the understanding and development of advanced machine learning systems for language applications, including translation and speech technologies.

Best Publications

  • Moses: Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation

    Philipp Koehn;Hieu Hoang;Alexandra Birch;Chris Callison-Burch

  • Findings of the 2014 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation

    Ondrej Bojar;Christian Buck;Christian Federmann;Barry Haddow

  • Findings of the 2015 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation

    Ondřej Bojar;Rajen Chatterjee;Christian Federmann;Barry Haddow

  • Findings of the 2018 Conference on Machine Translation (WMT18)

    Ondřej Bojar;Christian Federmann;Mark Fishel;Yvette Graham

  • Findings of the 2017 Conference on Machine Translation (WMT17)

    Ondřej Bojar;Rajen Chatterjee;Christian Federmann;Yvette Graham

  • Findings of the 2016 Conference on Machine Translation

    Ondˇrej Bojar;Rajen Chatterjee;Christian Federmann;Yvette Graham

  • Findings of the 2019 Conference on Machine Translation (WMT19)

    Loïc Barrault;Ondřej Bojar;Marta R. Costa-jussà;Christian Federmann

  • Training Tips for the Transformer Model

    Unknown

  • Transforming machine translation: a deep learning system reaches news translation quality comparable to human professionals.

    Martin Popel;Marketa Tomkova;Jakub Tomek;Łukasz Kaiser

  • Findings of the 2020 Conference on Machine Translation (WMT20)

    Loïc Barrault;Magdalena Biesialska;Ondrej Bojar;Marta R. Costa-jussà

  • Results of the WMT17 Metrics Shared Task

    Unknown

  • Results of the WMT19 metrics shared task: segment-level and strong MT systems pose big challenges

    Qingsong Ma;Johnny Tian-Zheng Wei;Ondrej Bojar;Yvette Graham

  • Findings of the IWSLT 2022 Evaluation Campaign

    Unknown

  • Results of the WMT14 Metrics Shared Task

    Matous Machacek;Ondrej Bojar

  • Overview of the 1st Workshop on Asian Translation

    Toshiaki Nakazawa;Shohei Higashiyama;Chenchen Ding;Hideya Mino

  • HindEnCorp - Hindi-English and Hindi-only Corpus for Machine Translation

    Ondrej Bojar;Vojtėch Diatka;Pavel Rychl'y;Pavel Stranak

  • Curriculum Learning and Minibatch Bucketing in Neural Machine Translation.

    Tom Kocmi;Ondrej Bojar

  • Results of the WMT16 Metrics Shared Task

    Unknown

  • FINDINGS OF THE IWSLT 2020 EVALUATION CAMPAIGN

    Ebrahim Ansari;Amittai Axelrod;Nguyen Bach;Ondrej Bojar

  • Overview of the 6th Workshop on Asian Translation

    Toshiaki Nakazawa;Nobushige Doi;Shohei Higashiyama;Chenchen Ding

  • Results of the WMT15 Metrics Shared Task

    Miloš Stanojević;Amir Kamran;Philipp Koehn;Ondřej Bojar

  • Results of the WMT20 Metrics Shared Task.

    Nitika Mathur;Johnny Wei;Markus Freitag;Qingsong Ma

  • FINDINGS OF THE IWSLT 2021 EVALUATION CAMPAIGN

    Antonios Anastasopoulos;Ondrej Bojar;Jacob Bremerman;Roldano Cattoni

  • Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation: Factored Translation Models and Lattice Decoding

    Philipp Koehn;Marcello Federico;Wade Shen;Nicola Bertoldi

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry Haddow
Barry Haddow University of Edinburgh
Philipp Koehn
Philipp Koehn Johns Hopkins University
Lucia Specia
Lucia Specia Imperial College London
Marcello Federico
Marcello Federico Amazon (United States)
Alex Waibel
Alex Waibel Carnegie Mellon University
Jan Niehues
Jan Niehues Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Rico Sennrich
Rico Sennrich University of Zurich
Chris Callison-Burch
Chris Callison-Burch University of Pennsylvania
Alexandra Birch
Alexandra Birch University of Edinburgh
Christof Monz
Christof Monz University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up multiple online education options and career routes. If you are looking for a way to quickly boost your skills without committing to a full degree, consider easy certifications to get online. These certifications often focus on in-demand tech skills and offer a fast path to higher earning potential.

For those aiming at advanced expertise and leadership roles, a master’s degree can make a significant difference. Many universities now offer programs labeled as the quickest online masters degree, allowing you to finish your studies in less than two years while balancing work or personal obligations.

Choosing what to study is crucial. To ensure strong job prospects after graduation, review which master's degree is most in demand in usa. Areas like data science, cybersecurity, and AI are especially popular among employers today.

If you’re seeking a flexible or affordable start, consider earning an associate degree online. This option offers foundational knowledge and can serve as a stepping stone toward a bachelor’s or entry-level tech job.

Best Scientists Citing Ondrej Bojar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles