World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
8448
World Ranking
5168
National Ranking
16

Andy Way publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andy Way sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 472 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andy Way D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andy Way sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andy Way is affiliated with Dublin City University in Ireland and specializes in computer science, with a primary focus on artificial intelligence. Their research extends into several related subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, language and linguistics, information systems, and human-computer interaction.

The scientist's scholarly output centers around natural language processing techniques and includes extensive work on topic modeling, text readability and simplification, multimodal machine learning applications, software engineering research, speech and dialogue systems, and translation studies and practices.

The following are some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Andy Way:

  • A review of the state-of-the-art in automatic post-editing, 2020, Machine Translation
  • Adaptive Machine Translation with Large Language Models, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Neural machine translation of low-resource languages using SMT phrase pair injection, 2020, Natural Language Engineering
  • Improving English-to-Indian Language Neural Machine Translation Systems, 2022, Information
  • Knowledge Distillation: A Method for Making Neural Machine Translation More Efficient, 2022, Information

Andy Way has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors including Rejwanul Haque, Séamus Lankford, Alberto Poncelas, Haithem Afli, and Georg Rehm. These collaborations reflect a network of research partnership within the field of machine translation and language technologies.

The venues in which they most often publish include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Machine Translation
  • Information
  • Natural Language Engineering
  • Digital

In addition to journal publications, Andy Way has contributed to academic books published by Springer Nature, Springer Science+Business Media, and Bloomsbury Publishing plc. Notable titles include European Language Equality published in 2023 and the book Machine Translation published in 2020, as well as Web and Digital for Graphic Designers from 2020.

Best Publications

  • Attaining the Unattainable? Reassessing Claims of Human Parity in Neural Machine Translation

    Antonio Toral;Sheila Castilho;Ke Hu;Andy Way

  • Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translation

    Eva Vanmassenhove;Christian Hardmeier;Andy Way

  • Exploiting Cross-Sentence Context for Neural Machine Translation

    Longyue Wang;Zhaopeng Tu;Andy Way;Qun Liu

  • Is Neural Machine Translation the New State of the Art

    Sheila Castilho;Joss Moorkens;Federico Gaspari;Iacer Calixto

  • Recent Advances in Example-Based Machine Translation

    Michael Carl;Andy Way;Walter Daelemans

  • Long-Distance Dependency Resolution in Automatically Acquired Wide-Coverage PCFG-Based LFG Approximations

    Aoife Cahill;Michael Burke;Ruth O'Donovan;Josef Van Genabith

  • Investigating Backtranslation in Neural Machine Translation

    Alberto Poncelas;Dimitar Sht. Shterionov;Andy Way;Gideon Maillette de Buy Wenniger

  • Post-editing effort of a novel with statistical and neural machine translation

    Antonio Toral;Martijn Wieling;Andrew Way

  • Quality expectations of machine translation

    Andy Way

  • Bridging SMT and TM with Translation Recommendation

    Yifan He;Yanjun Ma;Josef van Genabith;Andy Way

  • Supertagged Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation

    Hany Hassan;Khalil Sima'an;Andy Way

  • An Example-Based Approach to Translating Sign Language

    Sara Morrissey;Andy Way

  • Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation

    Marko Tadić;Philipp Koehn;Johann Roturier;Andy Way

  • A Comparative Quality Evaluation of PBSMT and NMT using Professional Translators

    Sheila Castilho;Joss Moorkens;Federico Gaspari;Rico Sennrich

  • Statistical Machine Translation: A Guide for Linguists and Translators

    Mary Hearne;Andy Way

  • What Level of Quality Can Neural Machine Translation Attain on Literary Text

    Antonio Toral;Andy Way

  • Translators’ perceptions of literary post-editing using statistical and neural machine translation

    Joss Moorkens;Antonio Toral;Sheila Castilho;Andy Way

  • Multi-Level Structured Self-Attentions for Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction

    Jinhua Du;Jingguang Han;Andy Way;Dadong Wan

  • Robust large-scale EBMT with marker-based segmentation

    Nano Gough;Andy Way

  • Wide-coverage deep statistical parsing using automatic dependency structure annotation

    Aoife Cahill;Michael Burke;Ruth O'Donovan;Stefan Riezler

  • Post-editing effort of a novel with statistical and neural machinetranslation

    Antonio Toral;Martijn Wieling;Andy Way

  • Attaining the unattainable? Reassessing claimsof human parity in neural machine translation

    Antonio Toral;Sheila Castilho;Ke Hu;Andy Way

  • A comparative quality evaluation of PBSMT andNMT using professional translators

    Sheila Castilho;Joss Moorkens;Federico Gaspari;Rico Sennrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Josef van Genabith
Josef van Genabith Saarland University
Qun Liu
Qun Liu Huawei Technologies (China)
Zhaopeng Tu
Zhaopeng Tu Tencent (China)
Antal van den Bosch
Antal van den Bosch Radboud University
Rico Sennrich
Rico Sennrich University of Zurich
Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Pushpak Bhattacharyya Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Asif Ekbal
Asif Ekbal Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Hermann Ney
Hermann Ney RWTH Aachen University
Hang Li
Hang Li ByteDance
Walter Daelemans
Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education offers flexible and affordable ways to advance your computer science career. Many students aim to minimize costs, making it important to find affordable graduate school options. These programs enable you to earn respected credentials without a large financial burden.

For those interested in leadership roles in tech or academia, pursuing a phd organizational leadership can be a strategic step. Doctoral programs with online delivery provide the flexibility needed for working professionals.

If you’re seeking a quick path into the computing field, consider the fastest associates degree programs. These are ideal for building foundational skills and entering the job market sooner.

Educators and leaders may also benefit from most affordable edd programs, which emphasize both practical leadership and educational research.

No matter your goal, there are diverse, budget-friendly options for every stage of your computer science learning journey.

Best Scientists Citing Andy Way

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles