World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
14804
World Ranking
5238
National Ranking
2412

Alon Lavie publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alon Lavie sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 183 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alon Lavie D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alon Lavie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alon Lavie is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies

Alon Lavie's recent publications span various venues. Key papers include:

  • "CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Task," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Unbabel's Participation in the WMT20 Metrics Shared Task," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Simple LLM Prompting is State-of-the-Art for Robust and Multilingual Dialogue Evaluation," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Towards a Conversational Ethics of Large Language Models," 2024, American Philosophical Quarterly
  • "Language Technologies for Humanitarian Aid," 2022, Fordham University Press eBooks

The prominent publication venues for their work are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • American Philosophical Quarterly
  • Fordham University Press eBooks
  • The Journal of Specialised Translation

Frequent collaborators include:

  • John Mendonça
  • Isabel Trancoso
  • Ricardo Rei
  • Ana C Farinha
  • Hendrik Kempt

The broad interdisciplinary scope of Alon Lavie's work covers topics ranging from advanced AI models and natural language processing techniques to healthcare communication and ethical considerations related to large language models.

Best Publications

  • METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with Improved Correlation with Human Judgments

    Satanjeev Banerjee;Alon Lavie

  • Meteor Universal: Language Specific Translation Evaluation for Any Target Language

    Michael Denkowski;Alon Lavie

  • METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with High Levels of Correlation with Human Judgments

    Alon Lavie;Abhaya Agarwal

  • Better Hypothesis Testing for Statistical Machine Translation: Controlling for Optimizer Instability

    Jonathan H. Clark;Chris Dyer;Alon Lavie;Noah A. Smith

  • COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation

    Ricardo Rei;Craig Stewart;Ana C Farinha;Alon Lavie

  • Meteor 1.3: Automatic Metric for Reliable Optimization and Evaluation of Machine Translation Systems

    Michael Denkowski;Alon Lavie

  • The Meteor metric for automatic evaluation of machine translation

    Alon Lavie;Michael J. Denkowski

  • Parser Combination by Reparsing

    Kenji Sagae;Alon Lavie

  • Humor Recognition and Humor Anchor Extraction

    Diyi Yang;Alon Lavie;Chris Dyer;Eduard Hovy

  • Multi-Engine Machine Translation Guided by Explicit Word Matching

    Shyamsundar Jayaraman;Alon Lavie

  • The significance of recall in automatic metrics for MT evaluation

    Alon Lavie;Kenji Sagae;Shyamsundar Jayaraman

  • Meteor, M-BLEU and M-TER: Evaluation Metrics for High-Correlation with Human Rankings of Machine Translation Output

    Abhaya Agarwal;Alon Lavie

  • A Classifier-Based Parser with Linear Run-Time Complexity

    Kenji Sagae;Alon Lavie

  • Janus-III: speech-to-speech translation in multiple languages

    A. Lavie;A. Waibel;L. Levin;M. Finke

  • Automatic Measurement of Syntactic Development in Child Language

    Kenji Sagae;Alon Lavie;Brian MacWhinney

  • JANUS 93: towards spontaneous speech translation

    M. Woszczyna;N. Aoki-Waibel;F.D. Buo;N. Coccaro

  • High-accuracy Annotation and Parsing of CHILDES Transcripts

    Kenji Sagae;Eric Davis;Alon Lavie;Brian MacWhinney

  • METEOR-NEXT and the METEOR Paraphrase Tables: Improved Evaluation Support for Five Target Languages

    Michael Denkowski;Alon Lavie

  • Enhancing the usability and performance of NESPOLE!: a real-world speech-to-speech translation system

    Alon Lavie;Florian Metze;Fabio Pianesi

  • An interlingua based on domain actions for machine translation of task-oriented dialogues

    Lori S. Levin;Donna Gates;Alon Lavie;Alex Waibel

  • Automatic parsing of parental verbal input.

    Kenji Sagae;Brian MacWhinney;Alon Lavie

Frequent Co-Authors

Lori Levin
Lori Levin Carnegie Mellon University
Alex Waibel
Alex Waibel Carnegie Mellon University
Jaime G. Carbonell
Jaime G. Carbonell Carnegie Mellon University
Kenji Sagae
Kenji Sagae University of California, Davis
Chris Dyer
Chris Dyer Google (United States)
Carolyn Penstein Rosé
Carolyn Penstein Rosé Carnegie Mellon University
Brian MacWhinney
Brian MacWhinney Carnegie Mellon University
Tanja Schultz
Tanja Schultz University of Bremen
Fabio Pianesi
Fabio Pianesi Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Florian Metze
Florian Metze Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options is a practical way to advance your computer science career in the USA. Many students and working professionals begin with an associates degree online, providing foundational knowledge and an affordable entry into the tech field. This pathway can lead to junior roles or provide a stepping stone toward advanced study.

For those aiming to boost their credentials rapidly, consider one of the fastest masters degree online programs. These accelerated options allow students to complete their studies in as little as one year, offering swift access to higher-paying and more specialized opportunities.

If you're aiming for high-demand positions, pursuing one of the most valuable masters degrees can give you a competitive edge. Popular degrees in fields like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, or data science are especially sought after by employers.

Alternatively, short-term certifications for jobs are ideal for quickly building expertise in specific technologies or frameworks. Certifications can significantly enhance your resume and may help you qualify for specialized roles or promotions.

Best Scientists Citing Alon Lavie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles