World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick Segers

Patrick Segers

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
28149
World Ranking
13633
National Ranking
168

Patrick Segers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Segers sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,195 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Patrick Segers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Segers sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Segers is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has made contributions primarily within the fields of Medicine and Engineering. Their research focus encompasses subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Surgery.

Their work addresses several main topics, notably Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies, Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Elasticity and Material Modeling, and Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography.

Patrick Segers has published numerous scientific papers, notably in venues such as Artery Research, Hypertension, the Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Scientific Reports, and Physics in Medicine and Biology. The publication count in these venues reflects ongoing engagement with research developments in cardiovascular and biomedical engineering topics.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Patrick Segers include Julio A. Chirinos, Annette Caenen, Patrick Sips, Julie De Backer, and Nele Famaey. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications, indicating a network of researchers focused on cardiovascular and imaging research.

Selected papers authored or coauthored by Patrick Segers include:

  • 2024 Recommendations for Validation of Noninvasive Arterial Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement Devices, 2023, Hypertension
  • Assessing cardiac stiffness using ultrasound shear wave elastography, 2021, Physics in Medicine and Biology
  • Arterial pulse wave modeling and analysis for vascular-age studies: a review from VascAgeNet, 2023, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • Longitudinal Changes of Input Impedance, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Wave Reflection in a Middle-Aged Population, 2021, Hypertension
  • Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography in Cardiology, 2024, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging

Best Publications

  • Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity.

    Luc M. Van Bortel;Stephane Laurent;Pierre Boutouyrie;Phil Chowienczyk

  • Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'.

    Francesco U. S. Mattace-Raso;Albert Hofman;Germaine C. Verwoert;Jacqueline C. M. Witteman

  • Recommendations on the use of echocardiography in adult hypertension: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)

    Thomas H. Marwick;Thierry C. Gillebert;Gerard Aurigemma;Julio Chirinos

  • Large-Artery Stiffness in Health and Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

    Julio A. Chirinos;Julio A. Chirinos;Patrick Segers;Timothy Hughes;Raymond Townsend

  • Role of Pulse Pressure Amplification in Arterial Hypertension: Experts’ Opinion and Review of the Data

    Alberto P. Avolio;Luc M. Van Bortel;Pierre Boutouyrie;John R. Cockcroft

  • Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease

    Patrick Lacolley;Véronique Regnault;Patrick Segers;Stéphane Laurent

  • Arterial wave reflections and incident cardiovascular events and heart failure: MESA (Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

    Julio A. Chirinos;Jan G. Kips;David R. Jacobs;Lyndia Brumback

  • Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: Assessment of 1-D visco-elastic simulations against in vitro measurements

    Jordi Alastruey;Ashraf W. Khir;Koen S. Matthys;Patrick Segers

  • Telomere length and cardiovascular risk factors in a middle‐aged population free of overt cardiovascular disease

    Sofie Bekaert;Tim De Meyer;Ernst R. Rietzschel;Marc L. De Buyzere

  • Noninvasive (Input) Impedance, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Wave Reflection in Healthy Middle-Aged Men and Women

    Patrick Segers;Ernst R. Rietzschel;Marc L. De Buyzere;Sebastian J. Vermeersch

  • Left Ventricular Mass: Allometric Scaling, Normative Values, Effect of Obesity, and Prognostic Performance

    Julio A. Chirinos;Patrick Segers;Marc L. De Buyzere;Richard A. Kronmal

  • Use of pulse pressure method for estimating total arterial compliance in vivo

    N Stergiopulos;Patrick Segers;N Westerhof

  • Noninvasive Evaluation of Left Ventricular Afterload Part 2: Arterial Pressure-Flow and Pressure-Volume Relations in Humans

    Julio A. Chirinos;Patrick Segers

  • ARTERY Society guidelines for validation of non-invasive haemodynamic measurement devices: Part 1, arterial pulse wave velocity

    Ian B. Wilkinson;Carmel M. McEniery;Giuseppe Schillaci;Pierre Boutouyrie

  • Amplification of the Pressure Pulse in the Upper Limb in Healthy, Middle-Aged Men and Women

    Patrick Segers;Dries Mahieu;Jan Kips;Ernst Rietzschel

  • Noninvasive Assessment of Local Pulse Pressure. Importance of Brachial-to-Radial Pressure Amplification

    Francis Verbeke;Patrick Segers;Steven Heireman;Raymond Vanholder

  • Validation of non-invasive central blood pressure devices: ARTERY Society task force consensus statement on protocol standardization

    James E. Sharman;Alberto P. Avolio;Johannes Baulmann;Athanase Benetos

  • Ethnic-Specific Normative Reference Values for Echocardiographic LA and LV Size, LV Mass, and Systolic Function: The EchoNoRMAL Study

    K.K. Poppe;R.N. Doughty;J.M. Gardin;F.D.R. Hobbs

  • A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: comparison of three drug-eluting stents.

    Peter Mortier;Gerhard A. Holzapfel;Gerhard A. Holzapfel;Matthieu De Beule;Denis Van Loo

  • Recommendations on the use of echocardiography in adult hypertension: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)

    T H Marwick;Marwick T H;T C Gillebert;Gillebert T C

Frequent Co-Authors

Pascal Verdonck
Pascal Verdonck Ghent University
Julio A. Chirinos
Julio A. Chirinos University of Pennsylvania
Jan Vierendeels
Jan Vierendeels Ghent University
Dirk De Bacquer
Dirk De Bacquer Ghent University
Nico Westerhof
Nico Westerhof VU University Medical Center
Mathieu Pernot
Mathieu Pernot Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Guy De Backer
Guy De Backer Ghent University
Raymond R. Townsend
Raymond R. Townsend University of Pennsylvania
Roel Baets
Roel Baets Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t only mean becoming an MD or DO. There are many related online programs that can help you build a rewarding role in healthcare. For those interested in healthcare administration, top cahme-accredited mha programs provide the leadership skills needed to manage hospitals, clinics, and departments.

If you are already a registered nurse and want to advance your qualifications, there are flexible online rn-bsn programs without clinicals. These are ideal for busy nurses seeking advancement without a heavy clinical workload.

For those aiming for advanced practice or leadership roles, accelerated fastest online dnp programs make it possible to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in less time. If research or dissertation isn’t your preference, some online dnp programs without dissertation streamline the process, letting you focus on clinical expertise.

Each of these pathways offers different opportunities to impact patient care, health systems, and the broader medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Segers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles