World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
45622
World Ranking
8795
National Ranking
4532

Gary F. Mitchell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary F. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 353 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gary F. Mitchell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary F. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary F. Mitchell is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Over the course of their career, they have published extensively across various subfields related to cardiovascular health.

The research topics covered by Mitchell include:

  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Mitchell has contributed to notable journals and publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Hypertension
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • PLoS ONE

Recent influential papers authored or coauthored by Mitchell include:

  • "Arterial Stiffness and Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension," 2021, Circulation Research
  • "Arterial Stiffness and Long-Term Risk of Health Outcomes: The Framingham Heart Study," 2022, Hypertension
  • "Uses of Arterial Stiffness in Clinical Practice," 2020, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • "Arterial Stiffness in Aging: Does It Have a Place in Clinical Practice?", 2021, Hypertension
  • "Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage: Prevalence, Correlates, and Prognosis in the Community," 2021, Hypertension

Throughout their research, Mitchell has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, notably:

  • Ramachandran S. Vasan
  • Emelia J. Benjamin
  • Vanessa Xanthakis
  • Martin G. Larson
  • Naomi M. Hamburg

Mitchell's work is positioned at the intersection of clinical and epidemiological approaches to cardiovascular disease, with specific attention to arterial stiffness and hypertension-related outcomes. Their publication record demonstrates a consistent presence in high-impact cardiovascular research journals.

Best Publications

  • Arterial Stiffness and Cardiovascular Events The Framingham Heart Study

    Gary F. Mitchell;Shih-Jen Hwang;Ramachandran S. Vasan;Martin G. Larson

  • Changes in Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection With Advancing Age in Healthy Men and Women: The Framingham Heart Study

    Gary F. Mitchell;Helen Parise;Emelia J. Benjamin;Martin G. Larson

  • Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects

    Yoav Ben-Shlomo;Melissa Spears;Chris Boustred;Margaret May

  • Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension

    Daniel Levy;Georg B. Ehret;Georg B. Ehret;Kenneth Rice;Germaine C. Verwoert

  • Recommendations for Improving and Standardizing Vascular Research on Arterial Stiffness: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Raymond R. Townsend;Ian B. Wilkinson;Ernesto L. Schiffrin;Alberto P. Avolio

  • Ventricular Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction

    Gary F. Mitchell;Gervasio A. Lamas;Marc A. Pfeffer

  • Aortic Stiffness, Blood Pressure Progression, and Incident Hypertension

    Bernhard M. Kaess;Jian Rong;Martin G. Larson;Naomi M. Hamburg

  • Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and function: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility – Reykjavik Study

    Gary F. Mitchell;Mark A. van Buchem;Sigurdur Sigurdsson;John D. Gotal

  • Effects of central arterial aging on the structure and function of the peripheral vasculature: implications for end-organ damage

    Gary F. Mitchell

  • Clinical Correlates and Heritability of Flow-Mediated Dilation in the Community The Framingham Heart Study

    Emelia J. Benjamin;Martin G. Larson;Michelle J. Keyes;Gary F. Mitchell

  • Cross-Sectional Relations of Digital Vascular Function to Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Framingham Heart Study

    Naomi M. Hamburg;Michelle J. Keyes;Martin G. Larson;Ramachandran S. Vasan

  • Clinical Significance of Mitral Regurgitation After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gervasio A. Lamas;Gary F. Mitchell;Greg C. Flaker;Sidney C. Smith

  • Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators.

    G A Lamas;E J Orav;B S Stambler;K A Ellenbogen

  • Increased pulse pressure and risk of heart failure in the elderly.

    Claudia U. Chae;Marc A. Pfeffer;Robert J. Glynn;Gary F. Mitchell

  • Sphygmomanometrically Determined Pulse Pressure Is a Powerful Independent Predictor of Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function

    Gary F. Mitchell;Lemuel A Moye;Eugene Braunwald;Jean Lucien Rouleau

  • Measurement of heart rate and Q-T interval in the conscious mouse.

    Gary F. Mitchell;Andreas Jeron;Gideon Koren

  • Isolated systolic hypertension : prognostic information provided by pulse pressure.

    Michael J. Domanski;Barry R. Davis;Marc A. Pfeffer;Mark Kastantin

  • Influence of age, risk factors, and cardiovascular and renal disease on arterial stiffness: Clinical applications

    Athanase Benetos;Bernard Waeber;Joseph Izzo;Gary Mitchell

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Local Shear Stress and Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Dilation The Framingham Heart Study

    Gary F. Mitchell;Helen Parise;Joseph A. Vita;Martin G. Larson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ramachandran S. Vasan
Ramachandran S. Vasan The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Emelia J. Benjamin
Emelia J. Benjamin Boston University
Joseph A. Vita
Joseph A. Vita Boston University
Daniel Levy
Daniel Levy National Institutes of Health
Susan Cheng
Susan Cheng Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Vilmundur Gudnason
Vilmundur Gudnason University of Iceland
Marc A. Pfeffer
Marc A. Pfeffer Harvard Medical School
Tamara B. Harris
Tamara B. Harris National Institutes of Health
Lenore J. Launer
Lenore J. Launer National Institutes of Health
Sudha Seshadri
Sudha Seshadri The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of healthcare career opportunities beyond traditional medical degrees. For students seeking flexible education options, online healthcare programs offer accessible entry points into allied health professions.

Technology is transforming healthcare, and healthcare informatics degree programs prepare students to handle critical medical data and improve hospital processes. For those interested in the business side of medicine, online medical billing and coding programs teach essential skills in medical records management and insurance processing—fields with high demand for certified professionals.

The nursing profession remains foundational in patient care. Aspiring nurses can start or advance their careers with online nursing courses that offer both foundational learning and specialization options. Those aiming for advanced patient care roles can pursue nurse practitioner programs, opening opportunities for greater autonomy and leadership in clinical settings.

These online pathways provide flexible, affordable options for students seeking entry and advancement within the dynamic healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Gary F. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles