World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
9926
World Ranking
5628
National Ranking
339

Chris Baber publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Baber sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 337 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Chris Baber D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Baber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chris Baber is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on computer science and psychology. Within these areas, their subfields of study include social psychology, artificial intelligence, radiological and ultrasound technology, safety research, and cognitive neuroscience.

Baber's work frequently addresses topics such as human-automation interaction and safety, occupational health and safety research, ethics and social impacts of AI, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), machine learning in healthcare, and neuroethics, human enhancement, and biomedical innovations.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Baber include:

  • "Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI" (2022, Nature Medicine)
  • "The risks associated with Artificial General Intelligence: A systematic review" (2021, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence)
  • "The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring" (2024, Nature Medicine)
  • "Managing the risks of artificial general intelligence: A human factors and ergonomics perspective" (2023, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries)
  • "Making ergonomics accountable: Reliability, validity and utility in ergonomics methods" (2021, Applied Ergonomics)

Baber has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Sagir Yusuf
  • Scott McLean
  • Gemma J. M. Read
  • Neville A. Stanton
  • Paul M. Salmon

Their frequent publication venues reflect their interdisciplinary approach and include:

  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • Nature Medicine
  • Ergonomics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Applied Ergonomics

Baber has contributed to book publications, including a title published by The MIT Press:

  • Embodying Design (2022)

Best Publications

  • Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design

    Neville A. Stanton;Neville A. Stanton;Paul M. Salmon;Laura A. Rafferty;Guy H. Walker

  • Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology

    Neville Anthony Stanton;Rebecca Stewart;Don M Harris;Robert Houghton

  • What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams

    Paul Matthew Salmon;Neville Anthony Stanton;Guy H Walker;C Baber

  • Virtual reality and augmented reality as a training tool for assembly tasks

    A.C. Boud;D.J. Haniff;C. Baber;S.J. Steiner

  • Human error identification techniques applied to public technology: predictions compared with observed use

    Christopher Baber;Neville A. Stanton

  • Command and control in emergency services operations: a social network analysis

    Robert Houghton;C Baber;Richard McMaster;Neville Anthony Stanton

  • Cognition and Tool Use: Forms of Engagement in Human and Animal Use of Tools

    Christopher Baber

  • A tool to assess the comfort of wearable computers.

    James Knight;Christopher Baber

  • Event analysis of systemic teamwork (EAST): a novel integration of ergonomics methods to analyse C4i activity

    Guy H Walker;Huw Gibson;Neville Anthony Stanton;C Baber

  • A context awareness architecture for facilitating mobile learning

    Peter Lonsdale;Christopher Baber;Michael Sharples;Theodoros Arvanitis

  • The risks associated with Artificial General Intelligence: A systematic review

    Scott McLean;Gemma J. M. Read;Jason Thompson;Jason Thompson;Chris Baber

  • Task analysis for error identification: A methodology for designing 'error tolerant' consumer products

    C. Baber;N. A. Stanton

  • The comfort assessment of wearable computers

    J.F. Knight;C. Baber;A. Schwirtz;H.W. Bristow

  • Modelling Command and Control: Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork

    Neville Stanton;Christopher Baber;Don Harris

  • Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: a case study in the energy distribution domain.

    Paul Matthew Salmon;Neville Anthony Stanton;Guy H Walker;Daniel P Jenkins

  • From ethnography to the EAST method: a tractable approach for representing distributed cognition in Air Traffic Control.

    Guy Walker;Neville Anthony Stanton;Chris Baber;Linda Wells

  • Error by design: methods for predicting device usability

    Neville A Stanton;Christopher Baber

  • Multi-agency operations: cooperation during flooding

    Richard McMaster;Christopher Baber

  • Towards a definition and working model of stress and its effects on speech

    Iain R. Murray;Chris Baber;Allan South

  • Context Awareness for MOBIlearn: Creating an engaging learning experience in an art museum

    Peter Lonsdale;Chris Baber;Mike Sharples;Will Byrne

  • Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design: Second Edition

    Neville A. Stanton;Paul M. Salmon;Laura A. Rafferty;Guy H. Walker

  • After phrenology: neural reuse and the interactive brain.

    Chris Baber

Frequent Co-Authors

Neville A. Stanton
Neville A. Stanton University of Southampton
Paul M. Salmon
Paul M. Salmon University of the Sunshine Coast
Guy H. Walker
Guy H. Walker Heriot-Watt University
Mike Sharples
Mike Sharples The Open University
Mark S. Young
Mark S. Young University of Southampton
Alexander Artikis
Alexander Artikis University of Piraeus
Lee Cooper
Lee Cooper Northwestern University
Georgios Paliouras
Georgios Paliouras National Centre of Scientific Research Demokritos
Joachim Hermsdörfer
Joachim Hermsdörfer Technical University of Munich
John Lygeros
John Lygeros ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your career options after studying Computer Science in the USA? There are several flexible online degrees that can help you advance or diversify your skills. Many professionals consider pursuing mba programs to gain essential business leadership knowledge and boost employability in tech management roles.

For those looking to earn a graduate credential quickly, online one year masters programs offer condensed and intensive learning experiences. These programs are ideal for upskilling without a lengthy commitment.

If your focus is on landing a high-paying job swiftly, explore quick degrees online that pay well. These options are designed to equip you with in-demand skills and credentials in less time, helping you enter the workforce faster.

The tech field is evolving rapidly, with artificial intelligence as a leading growth area. Consider enrolling in one of the ai online degree programs to specialize in AI development, data science, or machine learning—crucial skills for the future.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Baber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles