World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
71
Citations
26040
World Ranking
1748
National Ranking
99

Mike Sharples publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Sharples sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 292 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mike Sharples D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Sharples sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mike Sharples is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly falls within the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on applications, information systems, developmental and educational psychology, artificial intelligence, and education. This multidisciplinary approach reflects a broad engagement with both technical and human-centric aspects of these domains.

Their main research topics include:

  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Digital Education and Society
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Topic Modeling

Sharples has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed papers published in respected venues. Significant recent publications include:

  • Innovating Pedagogy 2020: Open University Innovation Report 8, 2020, Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University)
  • Automated Essay Writing: An AIED Opinion, 2022, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Towards social generative AI for education: theory, practices and ethics, 2023, Learning Research and Practice
  • The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI: A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future, 2024, Open Praxis
  • Learning outcomes in online citizen science communities designed for inquiry, 2020, International Journal of Science Education Part B

The venues where Sharples frequently publishes reflect a diverse set of academic forums, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University)
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Learning Research and Practice
  • Open Praxis

Collaboration is evident in Sharples's work, with frequent coauthors including Eamon Costello, Eileen Scanlon, Christothea Herodotou, Aras Bozkurt, and Junhong Xiao. These partnerships indicate active engagement in interdisciplinary and cooperative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning

    Mike Sharples

  • Mobile technologies and learning

    Laura Naismith;Peter Lonsdale;Giasemi N. Vavoula;Mike Sharples

  • Towards a Theory of Mobile Learning

    Mike Sharples;Josie Taylor;Giasemi Vavoula

  • Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning

    Laura Naismith;Mike Sharples;Giasemi Vavoula;Peter Lonsdale

  • Mobile learning: small devices, big issues

    Mike Sharples;Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sánchez;Marcelo Milrad;Giasemi N. Vavoula

  • A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age

    Mike Sharples;Josie Taylor;Giasemi N. Vavoula

  • Innovating Pedagogy 2015: Open University Innovation Report 4

    Mike Sharples;Anne Adams;N Alozie;Rebecca Ferguson

  • How We Write: Writing as Creative Design

    Mike Sharples

  • One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration

    Tak-Wai Chan;Jeremy Roschelle;Sherry Hsi;Kinshuk Kinshuk

  • The Blockchain and Kudos: A Distributed System for Educational Record, Reputation and Reward

    Mike Sharples;John Domingue

  • Innovating Pedagogy 2016: Open University Innovation Report 5

    Mike Sharples;Roberto de Roock;Rebecca Ferguson;Mark Gaved

  • The Design and Implementation of a Mobile Learning Resource

    Mike Sharples;Dan Corlett;Oliver Westmancott

  • Innovation in Mobile Learning: A European Perspective

    Agnes Kukulska-Hulme;Mike Sharples;Marcelo Milrad;Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sanchez

  • Disruptive devices: mobile technology for conversational learning

    Mike Sharples

  • WP 4 - GUIDELINES FOR LEARNING/TEACHING/TUTORING IN A MOBILE ENVIRONMENT

    Claire O'Malley;Giasemi Vavoula;Jp Glew;Josie Taylor

  • Big Issues in Mobile Learning

    Mike Sharples

  • Evaluation of a Mobile Learning Organiser for University Students

    Daniel Corlett;Michael Sharples;Susan Bull;Tony Chan

  • Innovating Pedagogy 2014

    Mike Sharples;Anne Adams;Rebecca Ferguson;Mark Gaved

  • MEXICA: A computer model of a cognitive account of creative writing

    Rafael PÉrez Ý PÉrez;Mike Sharples

  • Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums

    Giasemi Vavoula;Mike Sharples;Paul Rudman;Julia Meek

  • A theory of learning for the mobile age: learning through conversation and exploration across contexts

    Mike Sharples;Josie Taylor;Giasemi Vavoula

Frequent Co-Authors

Eileen Scanlon
Eileen Scanlon The Open University
Peter Brusilovsky
Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh
Agnes Kukulska-Hulme
Agnes Kukulska-Hulme The Open University
Bart Rienties
Bart Rienties The Open University
Chris Baber
Chris Baber University of Birmingham
Martin Weller
Martin Weller The Open University
Claire O'Malley
Claire O'Malley Teesside University
Marcus Specht
Marcus Specht Delft University of Technology
Karen Littleton
Karen Littleton The Open University
Jeremy Roschelle
Jeremy Roschelle Digital Promise

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to many flexible online education and career options. Many students start with an associate's degree online, a great way to quickly build foundational technical skills. These programs are fast-tracked and often completed in just six months, making them ideal for those eager to enter the workforce or continue their education.

Another popular choice is pursuing an online bachelors degree. These programs provide in-depth knowledge and are widely recognized by employers in both tech and non-tech fields. If you are interested in tech’s application in business settings, the best online business management degree programs can equip you with essential management and leadership skills, combining technology with organizational strategy.

For those focused on technical expertise, consider enrolling in online engineering degree programs. These degrees prepare you for roles in software, systems, or broader engineering fields. Each pathway offers unique opportunities, so choosing the right one depends on your career goals, interests, and desired level of flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Sharples

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles