World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5598 5194 935 869 144 7806

Martin Weller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Weller between 1999 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Weller published across 25 years, from 1999 to 2023, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2018. 10 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2018. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications
1999 2023

157 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Weller: publications per year, 1999 to 2023
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 11
2003 4
2004 4
2005 3
2006 2
2007 8
2008 6
2009 2
2010 2
2011 10
2012 11
2013 6
2014 12
2015 8
2016 8
2017 6
2018 15
2019 11
2020 9
2021 5
2022 4
2023 6
Total 157
Download as CSV

Martin Weller publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Weller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 144
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Weller D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Weller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Weller is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily across the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, with a stronger focus on applications within Computer Science. They have contributed to subfields such as Computer Science Applications, Education, Information Systems, Safety Research, and Information Systems and Management.

The main research topics of Martin Weller include:

  • Open Education and E-Learning
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Educational Tools and Methods
  • Digital Education and Society
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management

They have frequently published in a range of venues, with notable contributions to:

  • Journal of Interactive Media in Education
  • The Open/Technology in Education Society and Scholarship Association Journal
  • Distance Education
  • Open Praxis
  • Journal of innovation in polytechnic education.

Martin Weller has collaborated extensively with several researchers. Frequent co-authors include Robert Farrow, Rebecca Pitt, Francisco Iniesto, Rebecca Ferguson, and Carina Bossu.

Among recent papers, some notable works are:

  • Supporting open educational practices through open textbooks, 2020, published in Distance Education
  • Openness in Education as a Praxis: From Individual Testimonials to Collective Voices, 2023, published in Open Praxis
  • Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art, 2021, published in Journal of innovation in polytechnic education.
  • Open Textbooks as an innovation route for open science pedagogy, 2020, published in Education for Information
  • Introducing A Reflective Framework for the Assessment and Recognition of Microcredentials, 2022, published in The Open/Technology in Education Society and Scholarship Association Journal

Their book publications include titles from a variety of academic presses, such as Athabasca University Press with works including 25 Years of Ed Tech (2020) and Metaphors of Ed Tech (2022). Other published books include GO-GN Research Methods Handbook (2020) from the European Organization for Nuclear Research, GO-GN conceptual frameworks guide (2021) from the University of Oklahoma, and La battaglia per l'Open (2021) from Ledizioni eBooks.

Best Publications

  • The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Academic Practice

    Martin Weller

  • Innovating Pedagogy 2016: Open University Innovation Report 5

    Mike Sharples;Roberto de Roock;Rebecca Ferguson;Mark Gaved

  • Virtual Learning Environments: Using, Choosing and Developing your VLE

    Martin Weller

  • Delivering Learning on the Net: The Why, What and How of Online Education

    Martin Weller

  • Innovating Pedagogy 2014

    Mike Sharples;Anne Adams;Rebecca Ferguson;Mark Gaved

  • The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Changing Academic Practice

    Martin Weller

  • The Digital Scholar. How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice

    Martin Weller

  • Factors affecting students' satisfaction on a web course

    Robin Mason;Martin Weller

  • E-portfolios: an assessment tool for online courses

    Robin Mason;Chris Pegler;Martin Weller

  • Digital Scholarship Considered: How New Technologies Could Transform Academic Work

    Nick Pearce;Martin Weller;Eileen Scanlon;Samuel Kinsley

  • Use of innovative technologies on an e-learning course

    Martin Weller;Chris Pegler;Robin Mason

  • Digital resilience in higher education

    Martin Weller;Terry Anderson

  • A pedagogy of abundance

    Martin Weller

  • The Impact of OER on Teaching and Learning Practice

    Martin Weller;Beatriz de los Arcos;Rob Farrow;Beck Pitt

  • The Battle For Open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory

    Martin Weller

  • MOOCs and the Silicon Valley Narrative.

    Martin Weller

  • Innovating Pedagogy 2019: Open University Innovation Report 7

    Rebecca Ferguson;Tim Coughlan;Kjetil Egelandsdal;Mark Gaved

  • Mapping the open education landscape: citation network analysis of historical open and distance education research

    Martin Weller;Katy Jordan;Irwin DeVries;Viv Rolfe

  • Using learning design as a framework for supporting the design and reuse of OER

    Gráinne Conole;Martin Weller

  • Learning objects and the e-learning cost dilemma

    Martin Weller

  • Academics and Social Networking Sites: Benefits, Problems and Tensions in Professional Engagement with Online Networking.

    Katy Jordan;Martin Weller

Frequent Co-Authors

Mike Sharples
Mike Sharples The Open University
Eileen Scanlon
Eileen Scanlon The Open University
Bart Rienties
Bart Rienties The Open University
Agnes Kukulska-Hulme
Agnes Kukulska-Hulme The Open University
Gráinne Conole
Gráinne Conole University of Leicester
George Siemens
George Siemens The University of Texas at Arlington
Dani Ben-Zvi
Dani Ben-Zvi University of Haifa
Jane Seale
Jane Seale The Open University
Rob Koper
Rob Koper Open University in the Netherlands
Terry Anderson
Terry Anderson Athabasca University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse online study options that can lead to rewarding careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. One common concern for students is affordability. For those interested in counseling, it’s important to seek cacrep accredited programs to ensure quality education without breaking the bank.

Aspiring marriage or family therapists can find programs tailored to their budget by exploring the cheapest online mft programs. Similarly, if you are thinking about a psychology degree, researching psychology degree cost can help you compare affordable options and plan financially for your educational journey.

For students interested in social work, online programs are accessible and in-demand. Those seeking an easier admissions process can explore msw programs with high acceptance rate, which can open doors to meaningful roles in community and social services.

Overall, the flexibility of online degrees allows individuals to balance life, work, and study—making a career in Social Sciences and Humanities more attainable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Weller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles