World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
10831
World Ranking
3806
National Ranking
656

Martin Oliver publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Oliver sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 186 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Martin Oliver D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Oliver sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Oliver is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within the social sciences and environmental science fields.

Their work covers several subfields of study including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, Education, and Safety Research.

Key research topics explored by Oliver include Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Digital Education and Society, Literacy, Media, and Education, Academic Integrity and Plagiarism, Marine and Fisheries Research, Digital Media and Philosophy, and Digital Literacy in Education.

Oliver has published frequently in several venues. Notable publication venues include:

  • Learning Media and Technology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Postdigital Science and Education
  • Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture
  • Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Frequent collaborators in Oliver's research include Allison Littlejohn, Michael J. Breen, Hanlin Zhang, Matthew McHugh, and John Potter.

Among the recent publications authored or co-authored by Martin Oliver are:

  • What in the world is educational technology? Rethinking the field from the perspective of the philosophy of technology, 2020, Learning Media and Technology
  • Lockdown literacies and semiotic assemblages: academic boundary work in the Covid-19 crisis, 2021, Learning Media and Technology
  • Who Will Watch the Watchmen? The Ethico-political Arrangements of Algorithmic Proctoring for Academic Integrity, 2021, Postdigital Science and Education
  • "YOU MAKE YOURSELF ENTIRELY AVAILABLE": EMOTIONAL LABOUR IN A CARING APPROACH TO ONLINE TEACHING, 2022, DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • Guidelines for Evaluating Artificial Light to Mitigate Unwanted Fisheries Bycatch, 2024, Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture

Best Publications

  • Can "Blended Learning" Be Redeemed?

    Martin Oliver;Keith Trigwell

  • How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated

    Sara de Freitas;Martin Oliver

  • Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design

    G. Conole;M. Dyke;M. Oliver;J. Seale

  • Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners

    Wilma Clark;Kit Logan;Rosemary Luckin;Adrian Mee

  • Technological determinism in educational technology research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology

    Martin Oliver

  • Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators

    Martin Oliver

  • Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students

    Rosemary Luckin;Wilma Clark;Rebecca Graber;Kit Logan

  • Student engagement and blended learning: Portraits of risk

    Debbie Holley;Martin Oliver

  • Developing Creativity in Higher Education: An Imaginative Curriculum

    Norman Jackson;Martin Oliver;Malcolm Shaw;James Wisdom

  • The Problem with Affordance.

    Martin Oliver

  • Electronic Voting Systems for Lectures then and Now: A Comparison of Research and Practice

    Vicki Simpson;Martin Oliver

  • Does E-Learning Policy Drive Change in Higher Education? A Case Study Relating Models of Organisational Change to E-Learning Implementation.

    Sara de Freitas;Martin Oliver

  • An introduction to the Evaluation of Learning Technology

    Martin Oliver

  • Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice

    Gráinne Conole;Martin Oliver

  • Learning in virtual worlds: Using communities of practice to explain how people learn from play

    Martin Oliver;Diane Carr

  • Learning technology: Theorising the tools we study

    Martin Oliver

  • The virtual playground: an educational virtual reality environment for evaluating interactivity and conceptual learning

    Maria Roussou;Martin Oliver;Mel Slater_aff n

  • Asynchronous Discussion in Support of Medical Education

    Martin Oliver;Graham P. Shaw

  • Web 2.0 technologies for learning at Key Stages 3 and 4:summary report

    Charles Crook;Colin Harrison;Tony Fisher;Rebecca Graber

  • A pedagogical framework for embedding C&IT into the curriculum

    Grainne Conole;Martin Oliver

  • Electronic Voting Systems for lectures then & now: a comparison of research and practice

    Vicki Simpson;Martin Oliver

Frequent Co-Authors

Gráinne Conole
Gráinne Conole University of Leicester
Alexandra Poulovassilis
Alexandra Poulovassilis Birkbeck, University of London
George D. Magoulas
George D. Magoulas Birkbeck, University of London
Jane Seale
Jane Seale The Open University
Rosemary Luckin
Rosemary Luckin University College London
Mike Sharples
Mike Sharples The Open University
Allison Littlejohn
Allison Littlejohn University College London
Keith Trigwell
Keith Trigwell University of Sydney
Friedrich W. Hesse
Friedrich W. Hesse Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Sue Bennett
Sue Bennett University of Wollongong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities offer a wide range of online degree options, helping students launch fulfilling careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. When choosing a program, it’s essential to consider factors like accreditation, affordability, and which specialties align with your career goals.

Those interested in counseling can explore best online cacrep counseling programs that meet the highest industry standards for quality and licensure preparation. Aspiring marriage and family therapists may want to look into popular mft degree programs, many of which are now available online for greater flexibility.

If you're focused on understanding human behavior or pursuing research, online degrees in psychology cover a variety of interests and job prospects. For those passionate about advocacy and helping underserved communities, msw schools offer accessible online pathways to a master's degree in social work.

Each of these online degrees can open doors to meaningful careers in education, healthcare, nonprofit leadership, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Oliver

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles