World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh

Joyce Hwee Ling Koh

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4052 3740 30 29 103 11372

Joyce Hwee Ling Koh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joyce Hwee Ling Koh between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joyce Hwee Ling Koh published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2015. 11 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2015. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications
2006 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 1
2008 0
2009 1
2010 7
2011 6
2012 7
2013 10
2014 9
2015 17
2016 6
2017 8
2018 2
2019 5
2020 2
2021 12
2022 3
2023 7
2024 4
2025 7
Total 116
Download as CSV

Joyce Hwee Ling Koh publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joyce Hwee Ling Koh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 103 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 103
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Joyce Hwee Ling Koh D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joyce Hwee Ling Koh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Joyce Hwee Ling Koh is affiliated with the University of Otago in New Zealand and has a research focus primarily within the social sciences and computer science fields. Their work centers on education, educational technology, and the integration of online learning environments.

Their publication record includes multiple papers in prominent journals, with research topics that address online and blended learning, innovative teaching methods, and higher education practices. They have contributed to the understanding of digital learning environments and faculty technological pedagogical content knowledge.

  • International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (3 publications)
  • British Journal of Educational Technology (2 publications)
  • New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies (2 publications)
  • Innovations in Education and Teaching International (2 publications)
  • Higher Education Research & Development (1 publication)

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Shifting online during COVID-19: A systematic review of teaching and learning strategies and their outcomes," 2022, published in International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
  • "Students' use of learning management systems and desired e-learning experiences: are they ready for next generation digital learning environments?," 2020, published in Higher Education Research & Development
  • "Three approaches for supporting faculty technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) creation through instructional consultation," 2020, published in British Journal of Educational Technology

They also have coauthored work in collaboration with Soovendran Varadarajan and colleagues, including a paper published in 2023 titled "A systematic review of the opportunities and challenges of micro-credentials for multiple stakeholders: learners, employers, higher education institutions and government," featured in the International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

Coauthors with whom Joyce Hwee Ling Koh frequently collaborates include:

  • Ben Kei Daniel
  • Soovendran Varadarajan
  • Jing Tian
  • Chang Ren
  • Yiheng Wang

Their research contributions extend across several subfields, including:

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Media Technology
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Main topics addressed in their work focus on:

  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Higher Education Practices and Engagement
  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Education and Technology Integration
  • Higher Education and Employability
  • Higher Education Learning Practices

Best Publications

  • Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming

    Sze Yee Lye;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh

  • A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge

    Ching Sing Chai;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Chin Chung Tsai

  • Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK)

    Ching Sing Chai;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Chin Chung Tsai

  • Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT)

    Ching Sing Chai;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Chin-Chung Tsai;Lynde Lee Wee Tan

  • Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre‐service teachers with a large‐scale survey

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai;Chin-Chung Tsai

  • Developing Pre-Service Teachers' Technology Integration Expertise Through the Tpack-Developing Instructional Model

    Joyce H. L. Koh;Shanti Divaharan

  • TPACK-in-Action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers' construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai;Lee Yong Tay

  • Examining Practicing Teachers' Perceptions of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Pathways: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai;Chin Chung Tsai

  • Teacher Professional Development for TPACK-21CL: Effects on Teacher ICT Integration and Student Outcomes

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai;Wei Ying Lim

  • Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai

  • Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Design Thinking: A Framework to Support ICT Lesson Design for 21st Century Learning

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai;Wong Benjamin;Huang-Yao Hong

  • Demographic factors, TPACK Constructs, and teachers' perceptions of constructivist-Oriented TPACK

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai;Ching Chung Tsai

  • Project-based learning and student knowledge construction during asynchronous online discussion

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Susan C. Herring;Khe Foon Hew

  • Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning

    洪煌堯;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai;Benjamin Wong

  • Students' perceptions of self-directed learning and collaborative learning with and without technology

    K. Lee;P.-S. Tsai;C.S. Chai;J.H.L. Koh

  • Exploring the factor structure of the constructs of technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK)

    Ching Sing Chai;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Chin Chung Tsai

  • 6A Review of the Quantitative Measures of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)

    Ching Sing Chai;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Chin Chung Tsai

  • Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices

    Ching Sing Chai;Feng Deng;Pei Shan Tsai;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh

  • Validating and modelling technological pedagogical content knowledge framework among Asian preservice teachers

    Ching Sing Chai;Eugenia M. W. Ng;Wenhao Li;Huang-Yao Hong

  • Design Thinking for Education

    Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Sing Chai;Benjamin Wong;Huang-Yao Hong

  • Exploring Singaporean Chinese Language Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and its Relationship to the Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs

    Ching Sing Chai;Chee Kuen Chin;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Chee Lay Tan

Frequent Co-Authors

Ching Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai Chinese University of Hong Kong
Chin Chung Tsai
Chin Chung Tsai National Taiwan Normal University
Timothy Teo
Timothy Teo Chinese University of Hong Kong
Khe Foon Hew
Khe Foon Hew University of Hong Kong
Charles M. Reigeluth
Charles M. Reigeluth Indiana University
Stephen J. H. Yang
Stephen J. H. Yang National Central University
Susan C. Herring
Susan C. Herring Indiana University
Cher Ping Lim
Cher Ping Lim Education University of Hong Kong
Jyh Chong Liang
Jyh Chong Liang National Taiwan Normal University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding careers. Today, more students are pursuing flexible and affordable online degrees to enter or advance in these fields. Programs like online msw programs are perfect for those seeking to make a difference in social work while balancing other personal or professional obligations.

For individuals interested in behavioral analysis, there are specialized options such as bcba masters programs online. These credentials are in high demand and lead to impactful roles working with children and adults with behavioral challenges.

Accelerated learning paths are also available; students looking to enter the workforce sooner can consider an accelerated social work degree or a fast track psychology degree online. These programs allow you to complete your studies efficiently without compromising on quality.

With so many flexible online pathways, you can gain the knowledge and credentials needed for fulfilling social sciences and humanities careers, even if you need to study from a distance.

Best Scientists Citing Joyce Hwee Ling Koh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles