World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles M. Reigeluth

Charles M. Reigeluth

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
52
Citations
15598
World Ranking
2389
National Ranking
1161

Charles M. Reigeluth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Reigeluth sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 200 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Charles M. Reigeluth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Reigeluth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles M. Reigeluth is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research spans several fields within the social sciences, with a significant focus on education and developmental psychology. The primary fields of study represented in their work include Social Sciences, Psychology, and Computer Science.

The scholar's work often addresses topics related to educational methodologies and technology integration in learning environments. The main topics covered in their publications include:

  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Experimental Learning in Engineering
  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Educational Innovations and Technology
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management

Reigeluth's frequent publication venues reflect a concentration on educational technology and distance learning. They have published multiple papers across these venues:

  • Educational Technology Research and Development
  • Contemporary Educational Technology
  • Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED)
  • TechTrends

Their recent papers include the following:

  • "To prove or improve, that is the question: the resurgence of comparative, confounded research between 2010 and 2019," 2021, Educational Technology Research and Development
  • "Differences in personalized learning practice and technology use in high- and low-performing learner-centered schools in the United States," 2021, Educational Technology Research and Development
  • "The instructional theory framework appears lost. Isn't it time we find it again?," 2020, Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED)
  • "Personalized Learning Practice in U.S. Learner-Centered Schools," 2022, Contemporary Educational Technology
  • "Guidance for wiki-supported collaborative learning and community knowledge building for an entire class: Enhancing learning environments during the COVID19 pandemic," 2021, Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED)

Reigeluth collaborates frequently with other researchers, indicating a networked approach to scholarship. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Peter C. Honebein
  • Dabae Lee
  • Yeol Huh
  • Chun-Yi Lin
  • Eunbae Lee

Best Publications

  • Instructional-design theories and models : an overview of their current status

    Charles M. Reigeluth

  • Instructional-design Theories and Models : A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II

    Charles M. Reigeluth

  • What Is Instructional-Design Theory and How Is It Changing?

    C. M. Reigeluth

  • Instructional Design: What Is It and Why Is It?

    Charles M. Reigeluth

  • Creating Technology-Enhanced, Learner-Centered Classrooms: K-12 Teachers' Beliefs, Perceptions, Barriers, and Support Needs

    Yun-Jo An;Charles M. Reigeluth

  • Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume III : Building a Common Knowledge Base

    Cindy Ives;Charles M. Reigeluth;Alison A. Carr-Chellman

  • Instructional theories in action : lessons illustrating selected theories and models

    Charles M. Reigeluth

  • The use of analogies in written text

    Ruth V. Curtis;Charles M. Reigeluth

  • Instructional design strategies and tactics

    Cynthia B. Leshin;Joellyn Pollock;Charles M. Reigeluth

  • An Instructional Theory for the Design of Computer-Based Simulations.

    Charles M. Reigeluth;Ellen Schwartz

  • The Imperative for Systemic Change.

    Charles M. Reigeluth

  • Systemic Change in Education

    Charles M. Reigeluth;Robert J. Garfinkle

  • In search of a better way to organize instruction: The elaboration theory

    Charles M. Reigeluth

  • Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume III

    Charles M. Reigeluth;Alison A. Carr-Chellman

  • The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions.

    Charles M. Reigeluth

  • Collaboration, intragroup conflict, and social skills in project-based learning

    Dabae Lee;Yeol Huh;Charles M. Reigeluth

  • A Review of Strategies for Sequencing and Synthesizing Instruction

    James Van Patten;Chun-I Chao;Charles M. Reigeluth

  • Educational Technology at the Crossroads: New Mindsets and New Directions.

    Charles M. Reigeluth

  • The Elaboration Theory of Instruction: A Model for Sequencing and Synthesizing Instruction.

    Charles M. Reigeluth;M. David Merrill;Brent G. Wilson;Reginald T. Spiller

  • A New Paradigm of ISD

    Charles M. Reigeluth

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Squire
Kurt Squire University of California, Irvine
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh University of Otago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of rewarding careers. If you’re interested in making a difference through social work, there are flexible academic options available. For instance, you can consider the cheapest online msw programs, which are designed to be affordable without sacrificing quality.

Those who want to advance rapidly may benefit from a social work accelerated program, allowing you to enter the workforce sooner. If your focus is on behavioral analysis and working with diverse populations, pursuing a bcba degree can lead to specialized roles in education, healthcare, and counseling.

Psychology is another popular pathway within this field. Students seeking a quicker path to graduation might explore an accelerated psychology degree, which combines flexibility and speed for motivated learners.

These online degrees offer adaptable study schedules, making them suitable for working professionals and those seeking career advancement, while also addressing the growing demand for skilled experts in the social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Charles M. Reigeluth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles