World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 35 11809 11473 106 101 233 4326

Jeroen Famaey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeroen Famaey between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeroen Famaey published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2025. 31 of the 255 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2025. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 3 publications
2008 2026

255 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeroen Famaey: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 4
2010 3
2011 4
2012 7
2013 11
2014 14
2015 10
2016 13
2017 14
2018 18
2019 18
2020 25
2021 22
2022 18
2023 19
2024 22
2025 28
2026 3
Total 255
Download as CSV

Jeroen Famaey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen Famaey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 233 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423 233
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeroen Famaey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen Famaey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 35
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeroen Famaey is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium and has made significant contributions in the fields of Engineering and Computer Science. Their extensive research portfolio includes 159 publications in Engineering and 58 in Computer Science, with a focused interest in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications.

Their work spans various subfields such as Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Key research topics covered by Jeroen Famaey include:

  • Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
  • IoT Networks and Protocols
  • Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Wireless Networks and Protocols
  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Jeroen Famaey has published extensively in several respected venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Sensors
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • IEEE Access
  • Journal of Network and Systems Management

Some of the recent papers authored include:

  • "Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things," 2020, Sensors
  • "Immersive Interconnected Virtual and Augmented Reality: A 5G and IoT Perspective," 2020, Journal of Network and Systems Management
  • "Batteryless LoRaWAN Communications Using Energy Harvesting: Modeling and Characterization," 2020, IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • "Wi-Fi HaLow for the Internet of Things: An up-to-date survey on IEEE 802.11ah research," 2021, Journal of Network and Computer Applications
  • "Real-Time Demand Response Using NB-IoT," 2020, IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Frequent collaborators of Jeroen Famaey include the following co-authors:

  • Filip Lemić
  • Jakob Struye
  • Carmen Delgado
  • Eli De Poorter
  • Ashish Kumar Sultania

Best Publications

  • Survey on Terahertz Nanocommunication and Networking: A Top-Down Perspective

    Filip Lemic;Sergi Abadal;Wouter Tavernier;Pieter Stroobant

  • QoE-Driven Rate Adaptation Heuristic for Fair Adaptive Video Streaming

    Stefano Petrangeli;Jeroen Famaey;Maxim Claeys;Steven Latré

  • Design and Evaluation of a Self-Learning HTTP Adaptive Video Streaming Client

    Maxim Claeys;Steven Latre;Jeroen Famaey;Filip De Turck

  • Comparison of LoRaWAN classes and their power consumption

    Phui San Cheong;Johan Bergs;Chris Hawinkel;Jeroen Famaey

  • Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11ah Restricted Access Window mechanism for dense IoT networks

    Le Tian;Jeroen Famaey;Steven Latre

  • Simulating 6TiSCH Networks

    Esteban Municio;Glenn Daneels;Mališa Vučinić;Steven Latré

  • Implementation and Validation of an IEEE 802.11ah Module for ns-3

    Le Tian;Sébastien Deronne;Steven Latré;Jeroen Famaey

  • Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things.

    Amina Seferagić;Jeroen Famaey;Eli De Poorter;Jeroen Hoebeke

  • Design and optimisation of a FAQ-learning-based HTTP adaptive streaming client

    Maxim Claeys;Steven Latré;Jeroen Famaey;Tingyao Wu

  • On the merits of SVC-based HTTP Adaptive Streaming

    Jeroen Famaey;Steven Latre;Niels Bouten;Wim Van de Meerssche

  • Immersive Interconnected Virtual and Augmented Reality: A 5G and IoT Perspective

    Maria Torres Vega;Christos Liaskos;Sergi Abadal;Evangelos Papapetrou

  • Design of a Q-learning-based client quality selection algorithm for HTTP adaptive video streaming

    Maxim Claeys;Steven Latré;Jeroen Famaey;Tingyao Wu

  • Deep Learning for Quality Assessment in Live Video Streaming

    Maria Torres Vega;Decebal Constantin Mocanu;Jeroen Famaey;Stavros Stavrou

  • In-network quality optimization for adaptive video streaming services

    Niels Bouten;Steven Latré;Jeroen Famaey;Werner Van Leekwijck

  • Challenges to support edge-as-a-service

    Steven Davy;Jeroen Famaey;Joan Serrat-Fernandez;Juan Luis Gorricho

  • QoE optimization through in-network quality adaptation for HTTP adaptive streaming

    Niels Bouten;Jeroen Famaey;Steven Latre;Rafael Huysegems

  • Wi-Fi HaLow for the Internet of Things: An up-to-date survey on IEEE 802.11ah research

    Le Tian;Serena Santi;Amina Seferagić;Julong Lan

  • Energy Modeling and Evaluation of NB-IoT with PSM and eDRX

    Ashish Kumar Sultania;Pouria Zand;Chris Blondia;Jeroen Famaey

  • Enhancing MPEG DASH performance via server and network assistance

    E. Thomas;M.O. van Deventer;T. Stockhammer;Ali Cengiz Beğen

  • Real-Time Station Grouping under Dynamic Traffic for IEEE 802.11ah.

    Le Tian;Evgeny M. Khorov;Steven Latré;Jeroen Famaey

  • Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11ah Networks With High-Throughput Bidirectional Traffic.

    Amina Šljivo;Dwight Kerkhove;Le Tian;Jeroen Famaey

  • Batteryless LoRaWAN Communications Using Energy Harvesting: Modeling and Characterization

    Carmen Delgado;Jose Maria Sanz;Chris Blondia;Jeroen Famaey

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven Latre
Steven Latre University of Antwerp
Filip De Turck
Filip De Turck Ghent University
Eli De Poorter
Eli De Poorter Ghent University
Jeroen Hoebeke
Jeroen Hoebeke Ghent University
Piet Demeester
Piet Demeester Ghent University
Bart Dhoedt
Bart Dhoedt Ghent University
Eduard Alarcon
Eduard Alarcon Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Joan Serrat
Joan Serrat Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
George Pavlou
George Pavlou University College London
Chong Han
Chong Han Shanghai Jiao Tong University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and flexible career pathways. Students can diversify their skill set by considering interdisciplinary fields that blend technology with specialized areas.

For those interested in sustainability and problem-solving, an environmental engineering degree allows you to apply engineering principles to protect the environment, all through affordable online study options. Similarly, those who enjoy innovation and design might consider an online degree for mechanical engineering, which provides foundational skills vital to various industries.

If you have a keen interest in science and analysis, a bachelor of science in physics online offers a strong theoretical and mathematical background. For students focused on technology’s fastest-growing field, a cheapest data science degree prepares you for roles in analytics, machine learning, and big data.

These related online programs offer flexible, cost-effective routes to rewarding STEM careers, making it easier than ever to broaden your expertise from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Jeroen Famaey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles