World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antti Ylä-Jääski

Antti Ylä-Jääski

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
3702
World Ranking
13720
National Ranking
125

Antti Ylä-Jääski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antti Ylä-Jääski sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 169 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Antti Ylä-Jääski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antti Ylä-Jääski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antti Ylä-Jääski is affiliated with Aalto University in Finland, contributing to research primarily in the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. They have a focused interest in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Transportation, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's research spans key topics including Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, Caching and Content Delivery, Image and Video Quality Assessment, Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs), Transportation and Mobility Innovations, Transportation Planning and Optimization, and Network Security and Intrusion Detection.

Their recent publications include:

  • Machine Learning Meets Communication Networks: Current Trends and Future Challenges (2020), published in IEEE Access
  • Video Caching, Analytics, and Delivery at the Wireless Edge: A Survey and Future Directions (2020), published in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
  • Cloud Gaming with Foveated Video Encoding (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
  • Data-Driven Capacity Planning for Vehicular Fog Computing (2022), published in IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • On-Demand Vehicular Fog Computing for Beyond 5G Networks (2023), published in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
  • IEEE Access
  • ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Antti Ylä-Jääski has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, notably Abbas Mehrabi with four publications, Gazi Illahi with three, Behrouz Jedari and Gopika Premsankar each with two, and Mario Di Francesco with two joint works.

Best Publications

  • Implementation of charging in a telecommunications system

    Phillip Ginzboorg;Jan-Erik Ekberg;Antti Yla-Jaaski

  • Folo: Latency and Quality Optimized Task Allocation in Vehicular Fog Computing

    Chao Zhu;Jin Tao;Giancarlo Pastor;Yu Xiao

  • Virtual Machine Consolidation with Multiple Usage Prediction for Energy-Efficient Cloud Data Centers

    Nguyen Trung Hieu;Mario Di Francesco;Antti Yla-Jaaski

  • Multipath Transmission for the Internet: A Survey

    Ming Li;Andrey Lukyanenko;Zhonghong Ou;Antti Yla-Jaaski

  • Exploiting hardware heterogeneity within the same instance type of Amazon EC2

    Zhonghong Ou;Hao Zhuang;Jukka K. Nurminen;Antti Ylä-Jääski

  • Machine Learning Meets Communication Networks: Current Trends and Future Challenges

    Ijaz Ahmad;Shariar Shahabuddin;Hassan Malik;Erkki Harjula

  • ViNav: A Vision-Based Indoor Navigation System for Smartphones

    Jiang Dong;Marius Noreikis;Yu Xiao;Antti Yla-Jaaski

  • Energy- and Cost-Efficiency Analysis of ARM-Based Clusters

    Zhonghong Ou;Bo Pang;Yang Deng;Jukka K. Nurminen

  • Video Caching, Analytics, and Delivery at the Wireless Edge: A Survey and Future Directions

    Behrouz Jedari;Gopika Premsankar;Gazi Illahi;Mario Di Francesco

  • Energy Consumption of Mobile YouTube: Quantitative Measurement and Analysis

    Yu Xiao;R.S. Kalyanaraman;A. Yla-Jaaski

  • Automatic Composition of Semantic Web Services Based on Fuzzy Predicate Petri Nets

    Jiujun Cheng;Cong Liu;MengChu Zhou;Qingtian Zeng

  • Practical power modeling of data transmission over 802.11g for wireless applications

    Yu Xiao;Petri Savolainen;Arto Karppanen;Matti Siekkinen

  • Edge Computing Assisted Adaptive Mobile Video Streaming

    Abbas Mehrabi;Matti Siekkinen;Antti Yla-Jaaski

  • Modeling Energy Consumption of Data Transmission over Wi-Fi

    Yu Xiao;Yong Cui;Petri Savolainen;Matti Siekkinen

  • Cooperative caching through routing control in information-centric networks

    Sumanta Saha;Andrey Lukyanenko;Antti Yla-Jaaski

  • Is the Same Instance Type Created Equal? Exploiting Heterogeneity of Public Clouds

    Zhonghong Ou;Hao Zhuang;Andrey Lukyanenko;Jukka K. Nurminen

  • Fog Following Me: Latency and Quality Balanced Task Allocation in Vehicular Fog Computing

    Chao Zhu;Giancarlo Pastor;Yu Xiao;Yong Li

  • Demo: iMoon: Using Smartphones for Image-based Indoor Navigation

    Jiang Dong;Yu Xiao;Marius Noreikis;Zhonghong Ou

  • Latency and throughput characterization of convolutional neural networks for mobile computer vision

    Jussi Hanhirova;Teemu Kämäräinen;Sipi Seppälä;Matti Siekkinen

  • A System-Level Model for Runtime Power Estimation on Mobile Devices

    Yu Xiao;Rijubrata Bhaumik;Zhirong Yang;Matti Siekkinen

  • Vehicular Fog Computing for Video Crowdsourcing: Applications, Feasibility, and Challenges

    Chao Zhu;Giancarlo Pastor;Yu Xiao;Antti Ylajaaski

  • Adaptive termination of voting in the probabilistic circular Hough transform

    A. Yla-Jaaski;N. Kiryati

Frequent Co-Authors

Sasu Tarkoma
Sasu Tarkoma University of Helsinki
Yong Cui
Yong Cui Tsinghua University
Pan Hui
Pan Hui Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Jukka K. Nurminen
Jukka K. Nurminen University of Helsinki
Andrei Gurtov
Andrei Gurtov Linköping University
Jan-Erik Ekberg
Jan-Erik Ekberg Aalto University
Tommi Mikkonen
Tommi Mikkonen University of Jyväskylä
Yusheng Ji
Yusheng Ji National Institute of Informatics
Sudhir Dixit
Sudhir Dixit University of Oulu
Ali Hassan Sodhro
Ali Hassan Sodhro Kristianstad University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a smart way to jumpstart your career in computer science, especially if flexibility or affordability is a priority. Many students consider starting with an associate's degree online, which offers foundational skills and can often be completed in less than two years. This path is ideal for those wanting to enter the workforce sooner or prepare for a bachelor's program later.

For those interested in graduate education, it's worth researching the shortest masters degree options. Accelerated online master's programs in computer science and related fields can allow you to earn your advanced degree quickly and enter high-demand roles faster.

Choosing the right specialization matters too. Learn more about which master's degree is most in demand in usa to help ensure your investment leads to strong job prospects. Cost-conscious learners should also compare tuition rates at the cheapest online college options, making quality education more accessible than ever. These online pathways open doors to lucrative and evolving tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Antti Ylä-Jääski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles