World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5782
World Ranking
12987
National Ranking
25

Ali C. Begen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali C. Begen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 154 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ali C. Begen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali C. Begen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Ali C. Begen is affiliated with Özyeğin University in Turkey and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, particularly within multiple specialized subfields.

Their research spans several main areas, including:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Signal Processing
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Within these fields, Begen's work addresses diverse topics such as:

  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Multimedia Communication and Technology
  • Video Coding and Compression Technologies
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Advanced Data Compression Techniques

Ali C. Begen has published extensively in academic venues, with a particular focus on:

  • SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • IEEE Communications Magazine
  • ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators include Abdelhak Bentaleb, Roger Zimmermann, Mehmet N. Akcay, May Lim, and Alex Giladi.

Some of Begen's recent publications include:

  • Catching the Moment With LoL$^+$ in Twitch-Like Low-Latency Live Streaming Platforms, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • From Capturing to Rendering: Volumetric Media Delivery with Six Degrees of Freedom, 2020, IEEE Communications Magazine
  • Data-Driven Bandwidth Prediction Models and Automated Model Selection for Low Latency, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • BoB: Bandwidth Prediction for Real-Time Communications Using Heuristic and Reinforcement Learning, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • Performance Analysis of ACTE, 2020, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications

Ali C. Begen was awarded the ACM Senior Member distinction in 2012.

Best Publications

  • An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptation algorithms in adaptive streaming over HTTP

    Saamer Akhshabi;Ali C. Begen;Constantine Dovrolis

  • Probe and Adapt: Rate Adaptation for HTTP Video Streaming At Scale

    Zhi Li;Xiaoqing Zhu;Joshua Gahm;Rong Pan

  • What happens when HTTP adaptive streaming players compete for bandwidth

    Saamer Akhshabi;Lakshmi Anantakrishnan;Ali C. Begen;Constantine Dovrolis

  • A Survey on Bitrate Adaptation Schemes for Streaming Media Over HTTP

    Abdelhak Bentaleb;Bayan Taani;Ali C. Begen;Christian Timmerer

  • Watching Video over the Web: Part 1: Streaming Protocols

    A Begen;T Akgul;M Baugher

  • Server-based traffic shaping for stabilizing oscillating adaptive streaming players

    Saamer Akhshabi;Lakshmi Anantakrishnan;Constantine Dovrolis;Ali C. Begen

  • An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptive video players over HTTP

    Saamer Akhshabi;Sethumadhavan Narayanaswamy;Ali C. Begen;Constantine Dovrolis

  • SDNDASH: Improving QoE of HTTP Adaptive Streaming Using Software Defined Networking

    Abdelhak Bentaleb;Ali C. Begen;Roger Zimmermann

  • Multi-path selection for multiple description video streaming over overlay networks

    Ali C. Begen;Yucel Altunbasak;Ozlem Ergun;Mostafa H. Ammar

  • Multi-path selection for multiple description encoded video streaming

    A.C. Begen;Y. Altunbasak;O. Ergun

  • Not All Packets Are Equal, Part 2: The Impact of Network Packet Loss on Video Quality

    J. Greengrass;J. Evans;A.C. Begen

  • Streaming video over HTTP with consistent quality

    Zhi Li;Ali C. Begen;Joshua Gahm;Yufeng Shan

  • SDNHAS: An SDN-Enabled Architecture to Optimize QoE in HTTP Adaptive Streaming

    Abdelhak Bentaleb;Ali C. Begen;Roger Zimmermann;Saad Harous

  • Caching in HTTP Adaptive Streaming: Friend or Foe?

    Danny H. Lee;Constantine Dovrolis;Ali C. Begen

  • Session Description Protocol Elements for the Forward Error Correction (FEC) Framework

    Ali C. Begen

  • Not All Packets Are Equal, Part I: Streaming Video Coding and SLA Requirements

    J. Greengrass;J. Evans;A.C. Begen

  • Forward Error Correction (FEC) Framework

    Mark Watson;Ali C. Begen;Vincent Roca

  • Forward error correction based data recovery with path diversity

    Ali Begen;David Oran

  • Constant-quality rate-adaptive streaming

    Ali C. Begen;David R. Oran

  • Bandwidth prediction in low-latency chunked streaming

    Abdelhak Bentaleb;Christian Timmerer;Ali C. Begen;Roger Zimmermann

  • Enhancing MPEG DASH performance via server and network assistance

    E. Thomas;M.O. van Deventer;T. Stockhammer;Ali Cengiz Beğen

  • Error Control for IPTV over xDSL Networks

    A.C. Begen

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Oran
David R. Oran Cisco Systems (United States)
Yucel Altunbasak
Yucel Altunbasak Georgia Institute of Technology
Roger Zimmermann
Roger Zimmermann National University of Singapore
Christian Timmerer
Christian Timmerer University of Klagenfurt
Bernd Girod
Bernd Girod Stanford University
Constantine Dovrolis
Constantine Dovrolis Georgia Institute of Technology
S.-H. Gary Chan
S.-H. Gary Chan Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Thomas Stockhammer
Thomas Stockhammer Qualcomm (Germany)
Jörg Ott
Jörg Ott Technical University of Munich
Honggang Wang
Honggang Wang University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science and related fields opens up flexible education options and a wide array of career pathways. For those who may have faced academic challenges in the past, there are online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, allowing more students to pursue their goals.

Fast-track options like the 2-year computer science degree online provide accelerated paths for students eager to enter the tech workforce quickly. Additionally, those interested in the intersection of technology and the environment can consider degrees such as the online environmental engineering degree science and engineering, which prepare graduates for in-demand roles in sustainability and infrastructure.

Beyond traditional tech careers, studying computer science can also intersect with areas like environmental studies. Find out what can you do with an environmental science major to discover specializations that combine computing, data analysis, and environmental problem-solving.

Whether you choose a traditional or non-traditional path, online education offers more opportunities than ever to build a foundation for your future career.

Best Scientists Citing Ali C. Begen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles