World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
8375
World Ranking
10052
National Ranking
4236

Constantine Dovrolis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constantine Dovrolis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 120 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Constantine Dovrolis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constantine Dovrolis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Constantine Dovrolis is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research focuses on a range of topics at the intersection of computer science and neuroscience, with notable contributions spanning artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, and machine learning applications.

The scientist's work is distributed across the primary fields of Computer Science and Neuroscience, with significant attention to subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Aging, and Environmental Engineering.

Dovrolis's research interests cover several main topics, such as:

  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Machine Learning and Extreme Learning Machines
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications

Their scholarly output includes papers published in a variety of journals and preprint archives. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • Network Neuroscience
  • PLoS ONE
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent publications encompass:

  • "The hourglass organization of the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome," 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • "NISPA: Neuro-Inspired Stability-Plasticity Adaptation for Continual Learning in Sparse Networks," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Multisensory integration in the mouse cortical connectome using a network diffusion model," 2020, Network Neuroscience
  • "PHEW: Constructing Sparse Networks that Learn Fast and Generalize Well without Training Data," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A weighted network analysis framework for the hourglass effect-And its application in the C. elegans connectome," 2021, PLoS ONE

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Qihang Yao, Kaeser M. Sabrin, Shreyas Malakarjun Patil, Ishaan Batta, and Mustafa Burak Gürbüz.

Best Publications

  • Bandwidth estimation: metrics, measurement techniques, and tools

    R. Prasad;C. Dovrolis;M. Murray;K. Claffy

  • An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptation algorithms in adaptive streaming over HTTP

    Saamer Akhshabi;Ali C. Begen;Constantine Dovrolis

  • What do packet dispersion techniques measure

    C. Dovrolis;P. Ramanathan;D. Moore

  • What happens when HTTP adaptive streaming players compete for bandwidth

    Saamer Akhshabi;Lakshmi Anantakrishnan;Ali C. Begen;Constantine Dovrolis

  • A case for relative differentiated services and the proportional differentiation model

    C. Dovrolis;P. Ramanathan

  • The Internet is flat: modeling the transition from a transit hierarchy to a peering mesh

    Amogh Dhamdhere;Constantine Dovrolis

  • NetDiagnoser: troubleshooting network unreachabilities using end-to-end probes and routing data

    Amogh Dhamdhere;Renata Teixeira;Constantine Dovrolis;Christophe Diot

  • Future Internet architecture: clean-slate versus evolutionary research

    Jennifer Rexford;Constantine Dovrolis

  • Proportional differentiated services, part II: loss rate differentiation and packet dropping

    C. Dovrolis;P. Ramanathann

  • Server-based traffic shaping for stabilizing oscillating adaptive streaming players

    Saamer Akhshabi;Lakshmi Anantakrishnan;Constantine Dovrolis;Ali C. Begen

  • Ten years in the evolution of the internet ecosystem

    Amogh Dhamdhere;Constantine Dovrolis

  • An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptive video players over HTTP

    Saamer Akhshabi;Sethumadhavan Narayanaswamy;Ali C. Begen;Constantine Dovrolis

  • Open issues in router buffer sizing

    Amogh Dhamdhere;Constantine Dovrolis

  • Twelve years in the evolution of the internet ecosystem

    Amogh Dhamdhere;Constantine Dovrolis

  • Buffer sizing for congested Internet links

    A. Dhamdhere;H. Jiang;C. Dovrolis

  • Using peeringDB to understand the peering ecosystem

    Aemen Lodhi;Natalie Larson;Amogh Dhamdhere;Constantine Dovrolis

  • BGP churn evolution: a perspective from the core

    Ahmed Elmokashfi;Amund Kvalbein;Constantine Dovrolis

  • The probe gap model can underestimate the available bandwidth of multihop paths

    Li Lao;Constantine Dovrolis;M. Y. Sanadidi

  • One-click hosting services: a file-sharing hideout

    Demetris Antoniades;Evangelos P. Markatos;Constantine Dovrolis

  • Path selection using available bandwidth estimation in overlay-based video streaming

    Manish Jain;Constantine Dovrolis

Frequent Co-Authors

Annalisa Bracco
Annalisa Bracco Georgia Institute of Technology
Ali C. Begen
Ali C. Begen Özyeğin University
Martijn P. van den Heuvel
Martijn P. van den Heuvel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Parameswaran Ramanathan
Parameswaran Ramanathan University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mostafa H. Ammar
Mostafa H. Ammar Georgia Institute of Technology
Ellen W. Zegura
Ellen W. Zegura Georgia Institute of Technology
Vijay Sivaraman
Vijay Sivaraman University of New South Wales
Athanasios Nenes
Athanasios Nenes École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Helen S. Mayberg
Helen S. Mayberg Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jennifer Rexford
Jennifer Rexford Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a variety of academic and career options. Many students consider adding niche skills through flexible online degree programs, which can lead to new opportunities or complement their CS background.

For those interested in law enforcement or public policy, the cheapest online phd in criminal justice can broaden your expertise while enabling you to study affordably from home. Alternatively, if you’re drawn to finance or business, pursuing the cheapest online accounting degree can open doors to roles in tax, audit, or analysis.

Tech-savvy learners might consider an online data science masters for advanced knowledge in machine learning and big data—skills highly sought after in today’s job market. If you’re interested in managing large-scale projects, an online construction management degree could help you transition into high-demand building and infrastructure careers.

No matter your pathway, online education offers affordability, flexibility, and a chance to broaden your career options beyond traditional computer science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Constantine Dovrolis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles