World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
19556
World Ranking
3968
National Ranking
1888

Ellen W. Zegura publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen W. Zegura sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 235 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ellen W. Zegura D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen W. Zegura sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Fellow For contributions to communication and computation in intermittingly-connected networks.

Overview

Ellen W. Zegura is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, with notable subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Education, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, such as Service-Learning and Community Engagement, Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, Caching and Content Delivery, Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, ICT in Developing Communities, and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development.

Among Ellen W. Zegura's recent publications are the following papers:

  • "Linking personal and professional social responsibility development to microethics and macroethics: Observations from early undergraduate education" (2020, Journal of Engineering Education)
  • "Revitalizing the public internet by making it extensible" (2021, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review)
  • "As a Squash Plant Grows" (2021, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction)
  • "The impact of community engagement on undergraduate social responsibility attitudes" (2023, Studies in Higher Education)
  • "A tale of three datasets" (2022, Communications of the ACM)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ellen W. Zegura include:

  • Morgan Vigil-Hayes
  • Elizabeth Belding
  • Daniel Schiff
  • Jason Borenstein
  • Jeonghyun Lee

The scientist has contributed to several publication venues multiple times. These venues include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Engineering Education
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Ellen W. Zegura was recognized as an ACM Fellow in 2013 for contributions to communication and computation in intermittently-connected networks.

Best Publications

  • How to model an internetwork

    E.W. Zegura;K.L. Calvert;S. Bhattacharjee

  • A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks

    W. Zhao;M. Ammar;E. Zegura

  • The road to SDN: an intellectual history of programmable networks

    Nick Feamster;Jennifer Rexford;Ellen Zegura

  • Modeling Internet topology

    K.L. Calvert;M.B. Doar;E.W. Zegura

  • A quantitative comparison of graph-based models for Internet topology

    Ellen W. Zegura;Kenneth L. Calvert;Michael J. Donahoo

  • Controlling the mobility of multiple data transport ferries in a delay-tolerant network

    W. Zhao;M. Ammar;E. Zegura

  • Message ferry route design for sparse ad hoc networks with mobile nodes

    Muhammad Mukarram Bin Tariq;Mostafa Ammar;Ellen Zegura

  • Serendipity: enabling remote computing among intermittently connected mobile devices

    Cong Shi;Vasileios Lakafosis;Mostafa H. Ammar;Ellen W. Zegura

  • Performance of hashing-based schemes for Internet load balancing

    Zhiruo Cao;Zheng Wang;E. Zegura

  • Directions in active networks

    K.L. Calvert;S. Bhattacharjee;E. Zegura;J. Sterbenz

  • A novel server selection technique for improving the response time of a replicated service

    Z.-M. Fei;S. Bhattacharjee;E.W. Zegura;M.H. Ammar

  • Femto Clouds: Leveraging Mobile Devices to Provide Cloud Service at the Edge

    Karim Habak;Mostafa Ammar;Khaled A. Harras;Ellen Zegura

  • Application-layer anycasting: a server selection architecture and use in a replicated Web service

    Ellen W. Zegura;Mostafa H. Ammar;Zongming Fei;Samrat Bhattacharjee

  • Application-layer anycasting

    S. Bhattacharjee;M.H. Ammar;E.W. Zegura;V. Shah

  • Capacity Enhancement using Throwboxes in DTNs

    Wenrui Zhao;Yang Chen;Mostafa Ammar;Mark Corner

  • Multicasting in delay tolerant networks: semantic models and routing algorithms

    Wenrui Zhao;Mostafa Ammar;Ellen Zegura

  • Utility max-min: an application-oriented bandwidth allocation scheme

    Zhiruo Cao;E.W. Zegura

  • Routing in Space and Time in Networks with Predictable Mobility

    Shashidhar Merugu;Mostafa H. Ammar;Ellen W. Zegura

  • Spectral analysis of Internet topologies

    C. Gkantsidis;M. Mihail;E. Zegura

  • COSMOS: computation offloading as a service for mobile devices

    Cong Shi;Karim Habak;Pranesh Pandurangan;Mostafa Ammar

  • The Road to SDN: An intellectual history of programmable networks

    Nick Feamster;Jennifer Rexford;Ellen Zegura

Frequent Co-Authors

Mostafa H. Ammar
Mostafa H. Ammar Georgia Institute of Technology
Elizabeth Belding
Elizabeth Belding University of California, Santa Barbara
Khaled A. Harras
Khaled A. Harras Carnegie Mellon University
Jun Xu
Jun Xu Georgia Institute of Technology
Jennifer Rexford
Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Rebecca E. Grinter
Rebecca E. Grinter Georgia Institute of Technology
Constantine Dovrolis
Constantine Dovrolis Georgia Institute of Technology
Saurabh Bagchi
Saurabh Bagchi Purdue University West Lafayette
Christos Gkantsidis
Christos Gkantsidis Microsoft (United States)
George F. Riley
George F. Riley Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in the USA opens up a range of affordable and flexible options for advancing your career. Prospective students looking for the cheapest bachelor degree programs can find a variety of accredited institutions offering budget-friendly choices in technology and related fields.

Similarly, those interested in engineering can benefit from an online engineering degree, which can offer both specialized knowledge and savings in tuition costs. For professionals seeking advancement into leadership, affordable emba programs provide a flexible route to acquiring essential business skills without leaving your job.

If your interests extend to information management, consider the value of online mlis programs. These programs open doors to careers in digital libraries or information systems, complementing a background in Computer Science. With so many online degree pathways available, it’s easier than ever to tailor your education to your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ellen W. Zegura

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles