World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7588
World Ranking
11060
National Ranking
4596

George F. Riley publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George F. Riley sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 181 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

George F. Riley D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George F. Riley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

George F. Riley was affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their academic career was focused on research and scholarship, though specific details regarding their research topics, paper publications, and academic outputs are not available in the current data set.

There is no record of recent papers authored by Riley, nor information about frequent co-authors or publication venues to indicate patterns of collaboration or preferred journals and conferences. This absence of detailed publication data limits insights into the evolution or scope of their scientific contributions.

Their areas of study, including main fields, subfields, and specific topics of work, were not documented in the provided data. Consequently, it is not possible to delineate the scientific domains or specialties that Riley pursued throughout their career.

No book publications attributed to Riley were noted, including the names of any publishers with which they may have been associated. Similarly, there is no record of awards or honors conferred on this scientist.

Given that Riley is noted as deceased, all references to their professional and academic activities are presented in past tense.

Best Publications

  • The ns-3 Network Simulator

    George F. Riley;Thomas R. Henderson

  • AS relationships: inference and validation

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Dmitri Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

  • The Georgia Tech Network Simulator

    George F. Riley

  • ns-3 project goals

    Thomas R. Henderson;Sumit Roy;Sally Floyd;George F. Riley

  • Large-scale network simulation: how big? how fast?

    R.M. Fujimoto;K. Perumalla;A. Park;H. Wu

  • Advancing Software-Defined Networks: A Survey

    Jacob H. Cox;Joaquin Chung;Sean Donovan;Jared Ivey

  • A generic framework for parallelization of network simulations

    G.F. Riley;R.M. Fujimoto;M.H. Ammar

  • Round-robin Arbiter Design and Generation

    Eung S. Shin;Vincent J. Mooney;George F. Riley

  • Worm detection, early warning and response based on local victim information

    Guofei Gu;M. Sharif;Xinzhou Qin;D. Dagon

  • Analytical models for information propagation in vehicle-to-vehicle networks

    Hao Wu;R. Fujimoto;G. Riley

  • A federated approach to distributed network simulation

    George F. Riley;Mostafa H. Ammar;Richard M. Fujimoto;Alfred Park

  • Spatial Propagation of Information in Vehicular Networks

    Hao Wu;R.M. Fujimoto;G.F. Riley;M. Hunter

  • NETI@home: A Distributed Approach to Collecting End-to-End Network Performance Measurements

    Charles Robert Simpson;George F. Riley

  • Comparing the ns-3 Propagation Models

    Mirko Stoffers;George Riley

  • A workload-based adaptive load-balancing technique for mobile ad hoc networks

    Y.J. Lee;G.F. Riley

  • Mapping peer behavior to packet-level details: a framework for packet-level simulation of peer-to-peer systems

    Q. He;M. Ammar;G. Riley;H. Raj

  • Intrusion detection testing and benchmarking methodologies

    N. Athanasiades;R. Abler;J. Levine;H. Owen

  • Efficient implementations of java remote method invocation (RMI)

    Vijaykumar Krishnaswamy;Dan Walther;Sumeer Bhola;Ethendranath Bommaiah

  • Revealing the Autonomous System Taxonomy: The Machine Learning Approach

    Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos;Dmitri V. Krioukov;George F. Riley;Kimberly C. Claffy

  • Graph annotations in modeling complex network topologies

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Dmitri Krioukov;Amin Vahdat;George Riley

  • Simulating Internet worms

    G.E. Riley;M.L. Sharif;Wenke Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Fujimoto
Richard M. Fujimoto Georgia Institute of Technology
Mostafa H. Ammar
Mostafa H. Ammar Georgia Institute of Technology
Xenofontas Dimitropoulos
Xenofontas Dimitropoulos University of Crete
Dmitri Krioukov
Dmitri Krioukov Northeastern University
Douglas M. Blough
Douglas M. Blough Georgia Institute of Technology
Sudhakar Yalamanchili
Sudhakar Yalamanchili Georgia Institute of Technology
David M. Nicol
David M. Nicol University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bradley Huffaker
Bradley Huffaker University of California, San Diego
Barry L. Nelson
Barry L. Nelson Northwestern University
Sumit Roy
Sumit Roy University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness for students interested in computer science or related career paths. Affordable and accelerated programs are now widely available, helping learners reduce expenses and start their careers sooner.

Those looking for an advanced qualification might consider the most affordable online masters options in technology and computer science. These programs can provide specialized skills and boost your professional prospects without burdening you with debt.

For leadership roles, a doctorate organizational leadership online can open doors to positions in tech management and higher education. Additionally, you may want to explore the cheapest accredited online doctoral programs that can further enhance your credentials for top-tier roles.

If you're new to higher education or seeking a faster route into the technology sector, consider an associate degree in 6 months online. This can quickly prepare you for entry-level roles in computer science or IT, letting you gain practical experience while you continue your studies.

Best Scientists Citing George F. Riley

Recently Published Articles