World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5995
World Ranking
12506
National Ranking
5076

Douglas M. Blough publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas M. Blough sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 195 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Douglas M. Blough D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas M. Blough sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas M. Blough is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Engineering. Their work extensively covers subfields such as Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Aerospace Engineering, and Media Technology.

The main topics of Douglas M. Blough's research include:

  • Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Microwave Engineering and Waveguides
  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
  • Power Line Communications and Noise
  • Antenna Design and Analysis

Douglas M. Blough has contributed scholarly articles to a variety of publication venues. Frequent venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Communications
  • 2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Recent papers authored under their guidance or collaboration include:

  • "Maximizing Line-of-Sight Coverage for mmWave Wireless LANs With Multiple Access Points," 2021, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • "Effects of SNR-Dependent Beam Alignment Errors on Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • "Optimizing Coverage with Intelligent Surfaces for Indoor mmWave Networks," 2022, IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications
  • "Joint link-level and network-level reconfiguration for urban mmWave wireless backhaul networks," 2020, Computer Communications
  • "Optimal Path Construction with Decode and Forward Relays in mmWave Backhaul Networks," 2020, 2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)

Collaboration with frequent co-authors has been an element of their research activity. Notable collaborators include:

  • Yuchen Liu
  • Qiang Hu
  • Muhammad Saad Zia
  • Mary Ann Weitnauer
  • Raghupathy Sivakumar

Best Publications

  • The critical transmitting range for connectivity in sparse wireless ad hoc networks

    P. Santi;D.M. Blough

  • Computationally efficient scheduling with the physical interference model for throughput improvement in wireless mesh networks

    Gurashish Brar;Douglas M. Blough;Paolo Santi

  • Investigating upper bounds on network lifetime extension for cell-based energy conservation techniques in stationary ad hoc networks

    Douglas M. Blough;Paolo Santi

  • The K-Neigh Protocol for Symmetric Topology Control in Ad Hoc Networks

    Douglas M. Blough;Mauro Leoncini;Giovanni Resta;Paolo Santi

  • A statistical analysis of the long-run node spatial distribution in mobile ad hoc networks

    Douglas M. Blough;Giovanni Resta;Paolo Santi

  • The k-Neighbors Approach to Interference Bounded and Symmetric Topology Control in Ad Hoc Networks

    D.M. Blough;M. Leoncini;G. Resta;P. Santi

  • A probabilistic analysis for the range assignment problem in ad hoc networks

    Paolo Santi;Douglas M. Blough;Feodor Vainstein

  • Data obfuscation: anonymity and desensitization of usable data sets

    D.E. Bakken;R. Rarameswaran;D.M. Blough;A.A. Franz

  • An evaluation of connectivity in mobile wireless ad hoc networks

    P. Santi;D.M. Blough

  • The broadcast comparison model for on-line fault diagnosis in multicomputer systems: theory and implementation

    D.M. Blough;H.W. Brown

  • On the Symmetric Range Assignment Problem in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

    Douglas M. Blough;Mauro Leoncini;Giovanni Resta;Paolo Santi

  • A hardware-software real-time operating system framework for SoCs

    V.J. Mooney;D.M. Blough

  • A comparison of voting strategies for fault-tolerant distributed systems

    D.M. Blough;G.F. Sullivan

  • Approximation algorithms for wireless link scheduling with SINR-based interference

    Douglas M. Blough;G. Resta;P. Santi

  • An approach for fault tolerant and secure data storage in collaborative work environments

    Arun Subbiah;Douglas M. Blough

  • Distributed diagnosis in dynamic fault environments

    Arun Subbiah;D.M. Blough

  • Privacy Preserving Collaborative Filtering Using Data Obfuscation

    R. Parameswaran;D.M. Blough

  • Complexity of fault diagnosis in comparison models

    D.M. Blough;A. Pelc

  • Fault diagnosis for sparsely interconnected multiprocessor systems

    D.M. Blough;G.F. Sullivan;G.M. Masson

  • Efficient diagnosis of multiprocessor systems under probabilistic models

    D.M. Blough;G.F. Sullivan;G.M. Masson

Frequent Co-Authors

George F. Riley
George F. Riley Georgia Institute of Technology
Andrzej Pelc
Andrzej Pelc Université du Québec en Outaouais
Mustaque Ahamad
Mustaque Ahamad Georgia Institute of Technology
Raghupathy Sivakumar
Raghupathy Sivakumar Georgia Institute of Technology
John R. Barry
John R. Barry Georgia Institute of Technology
Fadi J. Kurdahi
Fadi J. Kurdahi University of California, Irvine
Joel H. Saltz
Joel H. Saltz Stony Brook University
Ling Liu
Ling Liu Georgia Institute of Technology
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a variety of online degree opportunities and flexible career pathways. If you are interested in tech but require flexibility, a computer science degree online offers a strong foundation with the convenience of self-paced learning. These programs are ideal for students balancing work or family commitments.

For those drawn to sustainability and technology, consider an environmental engineering degree online. This pathway blends engineering skills with a focus on solving environmental challenges—a growing field with high demand.

Interested in practical and hands-on problem solving? Learning about mechanical engineering degree online cost can help aspiring engineers discover affordable ways to enter this versatile profession. Mechanical engineers are essential across countless industries, from automotive to robotics.

Finally, a deeper interest in physical science might lead you to pursue an online physics degree. This path develops critical thinking and analytical skills valuable in research, data analysis, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas M. Blough

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles